Reviews a design document for completeness, internal consistency, code compliance, and constructability.
Reviews a design document for completeness, internal consistency, code compliance, and constructability.
npx skills add https://github.com/timjrobinson/Claude-Code-Construction-Manager --skill design-review이 명령을 Claude Code에 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
Guided construction project concept ideation — from zero idea to a structured project brief. Uses professional planning frameworks and construction industry best practices.
Analyzes project budget — cost vs estimate comparison, contingency status, value engineering opportunities, and cost projections.
Change order processing — document scope change, cost impact, schedule impact, and approval workflow.
Non-conformance/deficiency report — document the issue, reference spec/code, assign responsibility, and track corrective action.
Creates a Design Decision Record (DDR) — context, options, decision, rationale, and consequences.
Guided, section-by-section design document authoring for a specific building system. Gathers context from existing docs, walks through each required section collaboratively, and writes incrementally to file.
| name | design-review |
| description | Reviews a design document for completeness, internal consistency, code compliance, and constructability. |
| argument-hint | [path-to-design-doc] |
| user-invocable | true |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep |
When this skill is invoked:
Read the target document in full.
Read CLAUDE.md for project context.
Read related documents referenced by the target.
Evaluate against the 8 Required Sections:
Check internal consistency — do calculations support requirements?
Check code compliance — are code references specific and current?
Check constructability — can this be built as specified?
Check cross-discipline consistency — conflicts with other documents?
Output the review:
## Design Review: [Document Title]
### Completeness: [X/8 sections present]
### Code Compliance Issues
### Constructability Concerns
### Coordination Gaps
### Recommendations
### Verdict: [APPROVED / NEEDS REVISION / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED]