// Health-check the supplements wiki structurally and conceptually. Use when the user says "lint the wiki", asks whether the vault is clean, asks for maintenance findings, or wants low-risk structural fixes. Runs deterministic lint first, then performs targeted judgment-dependent review. Does not commit to git.
| name | wiki-lint |
| description | Health-check the supplements wiki structurally and conceptually. Use when the user says "lint the wiki", asks whether the vault is clean, asks for maintenance findings, or wants low-risk structural fixes. Runs deterministic lint first, then performs targeted judgment-dependent review. Does not commit to git. |
Use this skill to find drift before it compounds: schema drift, broken links, source hash drift, missing provenance, stale claims, research-queue items, and evidence-watch events that need triage.
wiki/handoff.md.CLAUDE.md, especially the Lint guidance and source-role rules.wiki/lint-rules.md.wiki/catalog.md if present; otherwise use wiki/index.md.wiki/log.md.Run:
python3 wiki/scripts/lint.py
If the only issue is a missing or stale static catalog, rebuild it:
python3 wiki/scripts/lint.py --rebuild-catalog
python3 wiki/scripts/lint.py
Lead with errors before warnings. Do not do conceptual review until structural errors are understood.
After deterministic lint, check what the script cannot fully decide:
[!source] callouts back to their
source-summary and raw/research source.source_role: synthesis.wiki/sources/promotion-queue.md; flag old
open rows and rows blocking decisions.wiki/research-queue.md; note overdue open
rows and rows that should be resolved, deferred, or promoted.wiki/evidence-watch.md; note overdue events
that should trigger hypothesis or decision updates.wiki/research-backlog.md; note open gaps, stale
pages, and thinly sourced areas.wiki/handoff.md does not reflect recent
operation-log work.Name specific files and claims. Avoid generic maintenance advice.
Report in this order:
For each finding, include the path and the smallest useful fix.
Without approval:
With approval or explicit apply wording:
/wiki-repair unless the user
explicitly asked to fix it in this lint pass./wiki-ingest.Summarize:
Do not commit to git.
Quick preliminary research on a supplement or question. Searches for promising evidence that might warrant full deep research. Outputs a structured scouting brief to wiki/scouting/ — kept separate from the main wiki until promoted through deep research and ingest. Use when: "is X worth researching deeper?", "what's the preliminary evidence for X?", "$scout taurine cognitive", "should I research quercetin?". Do NOT use for comprehensive research (use foundry-research deep-research instead) or for wiki ingestion (use wiki-ingest).
Ingest a source into the supplements wiki, or re-audit a past ingest. Use for foundry-research reports such as "ingest the sulforaphane research" or "$wiki-ingest sulforaphane"; arbitrary sources in raw/ such as "ingest the source at raw/foo.pdf" or "$wiki-ingest raw/foo.md"; and audit-only mode such as "$wiki-ingest --audit-only sulforaphane" or "what did we miss in the sulforaphane ingest?" Orchestrates staging, pre-check, repo-local extractor and auditor role instructions, and gap-report append. Does not commit to git; the human reviews first.
Health-check the supplements wiki structurally and conceptually. Use when the user says "lint the wiki", asks whether the vault is clean, asks for maintenance findings, or wants low-risk structural fixes. Runs deterministic lint first, then performs targeted judgment-dependent review. Does not commit to git.
Answer substantive questions from the supplements wiki and optionally file reusable answers into wiki/queries. Use for practical supplement questions, comparisons, stack decisions, evidence questions, mechanism questions, safety checks, and "what does the wiki say about..." prompts. Does not commit to git.
Make a scoped corrective edit to existing supplement wiki pages when the problem is already known. Use for audit findings, attribution mismatches, broken source links, stale status fields, scope qualifiers, metadata drift, or other narrow page issues that do not require a full re-ingest. Does not commit to git.
Run a periodic supplements wiki review. Use when the user says "run a wiki review", "monthly review", "quarterly review", "review the supplements vault", or asks what needs attention beyond a single ingest/query.