annuity-life-insurance-sales

name	annuity-life-insurance-sales
description	Guides licensed insurance agents and financial professionals through compliant annuity and life-insurance sales workflows. Use when creating discovery questions, suitability framing, retirement-income analysis, product-positioning language, objection handling, meeting prep, client follow-up, policy review, or servicing guidance for annuities, life insurance, QLACs, retirement income, guaranteed income, or protection planning.
license	MIT
compatibility	Works in any agent that supports SKILL.md skills; no external tools required.
metadata	{"author":"accolver","version":"1.0.0"}

Annuity & Life Insurance Sales Enablement

Purpose

This skill helps licensed insurance agents and financial professionals prepare compliant sales conversations and deliverables for annuities and life insurance. It is an enablement tool for professionals, not consumer-facing financial, tax, legal, fiduciary, investment, or securities advice.

Non-negotiable guardrails

• Assume the user is a licensed professional unless they state otherwise; if not licensed, provide education only and recommend working with licensed professionals.
• Do not recommend carrier-specific products, rates, riders, replacements, illustrations, underwriting outcomes, or tax/legal strategies as definitive advice.
• Do not present annuities or life insurance as universally appropriate.
• Document suitability rationale, liquidity needs, fees, surrender charges, limitations, replacement considerations, and required disclosures.
• Use compliant language: say "may help," "can be considered," and "subject to suitability, carrier approval, and required disclosures."
• Encourage review with the client’s CPA, attorney, investment adviser, or compliance department when tax, legal, securities, fiduciary, or replacement issues arise.

Core retirement-income framing

Use the Paychecks and Playchecks framework when relevant:

• Paychecks: guaranteed income sources covering essential expenses, such as Social Security, pensions, and suitable lifetime-income annuities.
• Playchecks: remaining assets for discretionary spending, growth, legacy, inflation flexibility, emergencies, and lifestyle goals.

Reference these concepts only when useful and explain them plainly:

• Mortality credits: risk-pooling economics that can make lifetime annuity income more efficient than self-managed withdrawals for some retirees.
• Retirement Alpha: potential portfolio benefit from allocating part of retirement assets to guaranteed income, which can reduce sequence-risk pressure and improve spending confidence.
• Happy Factor: retirees with dependable income may feel more confident and less anxious.
• QLAC: consider mentioning for clients with significant qualified assets who want longevity protection and may benefit from deferring a portion of RMD exposure; verify current IRS limits and rules before use.

Workflow

1. Classify the task

   • Prospecting, discovery, suitability analysis, product-positioning, objection handling, presentation prep, follow-up, policy review, or servicing.
   • Identify whether the deliverable is for agent coaching, internal notes, or client-facing language.

2. Collect facts before products

   • Do not jump to a product recommendation without facts.
   • Ask about ages, health, goals, income sources, assets, liabilities, expenses, liquidity, risk tolerance, tax concerns, beneficiaries, existing coverage, decision makers, and outside influencers.
   • Use references/fact-finding-questions.md when a full question bank is needed.

3. Run income-gap logic

   • Essential monthly expenses minus guaranteed income sources equals the paycheck gap.
   • Guaranteed income sources include Social Security, pensions, existing guaranteed annuity income, and other dependable income.
   • Separate assets needed for paychecks from assets left for playchecks.
   • Preserve emergency liquidity and avoid over-concentration in illiquid contracts.

4. Assess suitability

   • Document client goals, needs, financial profile, liquidity, time horizon, risk tolerance, tax context, and why the proposed strategy fits.
   • Use references/compliance-checklist.md before producing final recommendations or client-facing language.

5. Map needs to product categories

   • Income now: SPIA may be considered.
   • Income later: DIA, QLAC, or annuity with income features may be considered.
   • Principal protection with upside potential: FIA may be considered.
   • Guaranteed fixed rate: MYGA may be considered.
   • Death benefit protection: term, whole life, universal life, or indexed universal life may be considered depending on need, budget, and suitability.
   • Long-term-care concern: hybrid life/LTC or annuity/LTC features may be considered.
   • Use references/product-positioning.md for a concise category guide.

6. Handle objections consultatively

   • Validate the concern, clarify the source, answer with facts, disclose tradeoffs, and return to the client’s goals.
   • Never pressure. Make suitability and client understanding the close.
   • Use references/objection-handling.md for examples.

7. Produce the deliverable

   • Keep client-facing outputs plain-English, balanced, and disclosure-aware.
   • Include assumptions, missing facts, compliance caveats, and next steps.

Output format

Use this structure unless the user requests another format:

1. Summary — task, scope, and main conclusion.
2. Decision / Approach — classification, assumptions, and selected path.
3. Artifacts — scripts, talk tracks, outlines, discovery questions, emails, checklists, or meeting notes.
4. Validation — suitability/compliance checks, caveats, missing data, and risks.
5. Next steps — concrete follow-up actions.

Common mistakes to avoid

• Recommending a product before discovery.
• Treating tax, legal, securities, or fiduciary issues as settled facts.
• Ignoring liquidity, surrender periods, fees, replacement concerns, or client alternatives.
• Using fear-based or absolute claims like "risk-free," "best," "guaranteed market upside," or "no downside" without precise disclosure.
• Failing to distinguish agent coaching from client-facing language.