Skip to main content
Execute qualquer Skill no Manus
com um clique
Repositório GitHub

Cosmosh

Cosmosh contém 5 skills coletadas de agoudbg, com cobertura ocupacional por repositório e páginas de detalhe dentro do site.

skills coletadas
5
Stars
7
atualizado
2026-07-06
Forks
1
Cobertura ocupacional
2 categorias ocupacionais · 100% classificado
explorador de repositórios

Skills neste repositório

cosmosh-i18n-copy-style
Desenvolvedores de software

Cosmosh locale copy editing and validation workflow for packages/i18n locale JSON files. Use when updating, reviewing, deleting, or syncing supported UI locales, backend/main/renderer locale strings, unused i18n keys, placeholders, feature names, and copy tone in the Cosmosh repository.

2026-07-06
cosmosh-ui-patterns
Desenvolvedores de software

Cosmosh renderer UI design and interaction workflow for implementing, refactoring, or reviewing React/Tailwind/Radix UI work in the Cosmosh Electron app. Use when touching packages/renderer UI, pages, layout, tabs, SSH terminal interactions, SFTP/browser-like workflows, settings surfaces, visual tokens, CSS/Tailwind classes, Radix wrappers, localization, or UI/UX documentation for Cosmosh.

2026-05-23
google-cl-author
Desenvolvedores de software

Prepare and iterate changelists/pull requests using Google-style author practices. Use when writing clear CL descriptions, splitting large changes, bundling tests, handling reviewer comments, and keeping dependent CLs build-safe.

2026-03-07
google-code-reviewer
Analistas de garantia de qualidade de software e testadores

Run a Google-style code review workflow for pull requests and changelists. Use when reviewing design, correctness, tests, readability, comments, documentation, review speed, and comment severity (Required/Nit/Optional/FYI). Includes decision branches for large CLs, major design problems, and LGTM with comments.

2026-03-07
google-review-conflict-resolution
Desenvolvedores de software

Resolve reviewer-author disagreement using Google-style code review conflict workflow. Use when review comments stall, standards are disputed, or escalation is needed. Produces evidence-based consensus steps, escalation path, and documented final decision.

2026-03-07