Menu
Chain-of-thought reasoning with optional multi-model execution using nextThought
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Baseado na classificação ocupacional SOC
| name | think |
| description | Chain-of-thought reasoning with optional multi-model execution using nextThought |
| user-invocable | true |
Step-by-step reasoning chains with model execution.
/think [problem]
/think [model] [problem]
/think [model1,model2] [problem]
grok, gemini, openai, perplexity, kimi, qwen
When user invokes /think:
mcp__tachibot-mcp__nextThought({
thought: "[problem]",
model: "[model]",
executeModel: true,
contextWindow: "all",
nextThoughtNeeded: false
})
// First model (fresh)
nextThought({ thought: "Analyze: [problem]", model: "[model1]", executeModel: true, contextWindow: 0, nextThoughtNeeded: true })
// Second model (sees previous)
nextThought({ thought: "Build on analysis", model: "[model2]", executeModel: true, contextWindow: "all", nextThoughtNeeded: false })
Use gemini as default model.
/think why is my WebSocket disconnecting/think gemini optimize this query/think grok,kimi,gemini design a rate limiterUse when the user wants a security review of code or a diff — OWASP/CWE findings with severity, taint/data-flow analysis, and concrete fixes via security_review
Use when the user wants tests generated for code or a diff — enumerates edge cases and failure modes first, then emits runnable test code via testgen
Use when a task would benefit from a structured thinking technique but you're not sure which — recommends the right prompt technique for the intent (debug, spec, refactor, decision, design) and applies it
Use for decisions or judgments worth multiple independent perspectives — multi-model council with parallel analysis, search grounding, and synthesis (30-60s); for a quick single-call verdict use the jury tool directly
Use when the user shares or finishes a plan and wants it stress-tested before execution — adversarial multi-model pre-mortem with ranked risks, mitigations, and concrete plan edits
Use when code changes are ready for review — a diff exists, the user says "review my changes/PR", or a commit is about to happen. Multi-model diff review (Kimi, DeepSeek, GPT-5.5 panel + Gemini judge) with a MERGEABLE verdict