Menu
Review code, docs, or plans for correctness risks, missing evidence, unclear tradeoffs, and untested assumptions.
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Baseado na classificação ocupacional SOC
Audit an answer or implementation against primary sources before recommending changes.
Evaluate benchmark design for fair baselines, measurable outcomes, leakage, cherry-picking, and reproducibility.
Review a large question by staying inside one assigned slice, then support synthesis across several focused shard answers.
Check whether a change is ready for a public release candidate across packaging, docs, tests, and rollback risk.
| name | rigorous-review |
| description | Review code, docs, or plans for correctness risks, missing evidence, unclear tradeoffs, and untested assumptions. |
| license | MIT |
Review the request as a skeptical engineering reviewer.
Prioritize:
Return findings first. Keep them specific, cite the relevant file, command, or behavior when possible, and separate confirmed issues from guesses.
