Menu
Score repository health (0-100, A-F grades), priorities, and delta tracking. Includes velocity metrics, confidence levels, and bottleneck detection.
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Baseado na classificação ocupacional SOC
Use for web accessibility work in HTML, JSX, CSS, ARIA, keyboard, forms, contrast, modals, live regions, headings, links, tables, or WCAG review; starts accessibility-lead first and uses tool_search if subagent tools are lazy-loaded.
Developer tools accessibility router for Python, wxPython, desktop accessibility APIs, NVDA add-ons, scanner tooling, CI tooling, and accessibility developer experience.
Document accessibility router for Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF, EPUB, Office remediation, PDF remediation, and accessible generated documents.
GitHub workflow accessibility router for PR review, issues, Actions, releases, projects, security alerts, notifications, repository management, and accessible contributor workflows.
Markdown accessibility router for docs, README files, headings, links, tables, alt text, diagrams, generated docs, and publication-ready accessible markdown.
Compute web accessibility scores (0-100, A-F grades) with severity scoring, confidence levels, and remediation tracking across audits.
| name | github-analytics-scoring |
| description | Score repository health (0-100, A-F grades), priorities, and delta tracking. Includes velocity metrics, confidence levels, and bottleneck detection. |
Health Score = 100 - (sum of weighted penalties)
Penalties - CI & Reliability:
Failing workflow, high confidence: -10 points
Flaky test (3+ failures/week): - 5 points
No CI configured: - 8 points
Penalties - Issues & PRs:
Critical unresolved bug (P0): -10 points
Security alert (critical severity): -10 points
Security alert (high severity): - 5 points
PR open >14 days (stale): - 3 points each (max -9)
Issue @mentioned, no response >7 days: - 5 points each (max -10)
>10 open issues with no labels/triage: - 3 points
Penalties - Community Health:
No CONTRIBUTING.md: - 5 points
No CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md: - 3 points
No branch protection on main: - 5 points
0 open "good first issue" labels: - 2 points
Floor: 0 (minimum score)
| Score | Grade | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | A | Excellent - healthy repo, minimal issues |
| 75-89 | B | Good - minor issues, well-managed |
| 50-74 | C | Needs attention - multiple signals requiring action |
| 25-49 | D | Poor - significant problems impacting velocity |
| 0-24 | F | Critical - major issues blocking team progress |
Internally score each issue to determine sort order in dashboards and reports:
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| User @mentioned and hasn't responded | +5 |
P0, P1, critical, urgent, blocker label | +3 |
| Tied to upcoming release milestone | +3 |
| New comments from others since user's last activity | +2 |
| High community interest (5+ positive reactions) | +2 |
bug label | +1 |
| Assigned to user | +1 |
| Active related discussion thread | +1 |
wontfix, duplicate, question label | -1 |
| No activity >14 days | -2 |
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| Review requested, user hasn't reviewed | +5 |
| PR has "changes requested" - author needs to update | +4 |
| PR is approved and ready to merge | +3 |
| Targets a release branch with upcoming deadline | +3 |
| CI failed on this PR | +2 |
| Merge conflicts present | +2 |
| High community interest (5+ positive reactions) | +2 |
| New comments on the PR | +1 |
| Active discussion thread linked to this PR | +1 |
| Draft PR | -1 |
| No activity >7 days | -2 |
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| User was @mentioned | +3 |
| High activity (10+ comments in 24h) | +2 |
| Linked to an issue/PR the user owns | +1 |
| No activity >7 days | -1 |
Apply confidence levels to all bottleneck findings, health score deductions, and anomaly detections. Every finding in a report MUST include its confidence level.
| Level | When to Use | Impact on Report |
|---|---|---|
| High | Multiple corroborating signals, definitively observed (e.g., CI has failed 5 times this week, confirmed by logs) | Report as fact; recommend remediation |
| Medium | Found by one source, likely issue (e.g., PR open 14 days but author may be on leave) | Report as finding; suggest investigation |
| Low | Possible pattern, needs human review (e.g., velocity seems low but may be seasonal) | Flag as observation; don't deduct from score |
| Finding | Severity | Confidence | Recommendation |
|---------|----------|-----------|----------------|
| 3 PRs stale >14 days | High | **High** | Assign reviewers or close |
| Velocity 40% below 4-week avg | Medium | **Medium** | Verify - may be holiday period |
| Issue activity spike on Fridays | Low | **Low** | Monitor for 2 weeks before acting |
When re-running an analysis against a previous report, classify every finding by change status:
| Status | Definition |
|---|---|
| Fixed | Was in previous report; no longer present |
| New | Not in previous report; appears now |
| Persistent | Remains from previous report, unchanged |
| Regressed | Was previously fixed but has returned |
## Changes Since Last Report ({previous date})
| Change | Finding | Details |
|--------|---------|---------|
| Fixed | 3 stale PRs resolved | Team cleared the backlog |
| New | CI failing on main | Build broke in last 24h |
| Persistent (#3) | Velocity 30% below baseline | Third consecutive week |
| Regressed | Security alert reopened | lodash advisory re-filed |
**Progress:** {N} fixed, {M} new, {P} persistent, {Q} regressed
**Score change:** {current_score} ({+/-N} from {previous_score})
If a finding is Persistent for 3+ consecutive reports, escalate:
Escalation: [{Finding}] has been present for {N} consecutive reports. Consider a team discussion or explicit ownership assignment to resolve this.
| Metric | Formula | Healthy | Warning | Critical |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR merge rate | PRs merged / week | >3/week | 1-3/week | <1/week |
| Issue close rate | Issues closed / week | >5/week | 2-5/week | <2/week |
| Review turnaround | Avg hours PR open before first review | <24h | 24-72h | >72h |
| Issue response time | Avg hours until first team response | <8h | 8-48h | >48h |
| Stale PR ratio | PRs open >14 days / total open PRs | <10% | 10-30% | >30% |
| CI reliability | Passing runs / total runs (7-day) | >95% | 80-95% | <80% |
| Metric | Formula | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PR commit ratio | Commits / PRs merged | High ratio = large PRs, consider splitting |
| Review coverage | PRs reviewed by others / total PRs merged | Low = single-contributor bottleneck |
| First-time contributor rate | New contributors / total active contributors | Healthy community growth signal |
| Contributor retention | Active last month AND active this month / active last month | Engagement health |
| Bus factor | Min contributors whose departure halts 50%+ of commits | <3 is high risk |
| Category | Signals | Example Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Review bottleneck | High PR open time, review-requested PRs >3 days | "4 PRs waiting for review >3 days - assign or redistribute" |
| CI bottleneck | Frequent failures, long runtimes | "Test suite 45min avg - 2x slower than 4-week average" |
| Stale work | Issues/PRs with no activity >14 days | "7 issues open >30 days with no recent comments" |
| Knowledge concentration | 80%+ commits from one contributor | "3 of 4 core modules have only one contributor - bus factor 1" |
| Response lag | >24h average first response to new issues | "Average first response: 38h - community may feel unsupported" |
| Security debt | Open Dependabot alerts unresolved >7 days | "2 critical alerts open for 12 days" |
| Release congestion | >10 merged PRs unreleased | "11 merged PRs awaiting release - coordinate cut date" |
| Trend | Definition |
|---|---|
| Improving | Score increased 5+ points vs previous report |
| Stable | Score within 5 points of previous report |
| Declining | Score decreased 5+ points vs previous report |
| Recovering | Score increased after 2+ consecutive Declining reports |
| New | No previous report to compare |
## Repository Health Score
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Repo | [owner/repo](url) |
| Score | {0-100} |
| Grade | {A-F} |
| Trend | {Improving / Stable / Declining} |
| Open Security Alerts | {count} |
| Stale PRs (>14 days) | {count} |
| CI Reliability (7-day) | {%} |
| Unanswered @mentions | {count} |
## Repository Health Scorecard
| Repo | Score | Grade | Trend | Critical Issues | Notes |
|------|-------|-------|-------|-----------------|-------|
| owner/repo-a | 88 | B | Improving | 0 | |
| owner/repo-b | 54 | C | Declining | 1 | Security alert unresolved |
| owner/repo-c | 22 | F | Stable | 3 | Review bottleneck + stale PRs |
| **Average** | **54.7** | **C** | - | **4** | |
When project boards are configured, track sprint metrics:
| Metric | Formula |
|---|---|
| Sprint completion rate | Done items / total sprint items x 100 |
| Carryover rate | Items moved to next sprint / planned items |
| Cycle time | Average days from "In Progress" to "Done" |
| Throughput | Items completed per sprint |
| Blocked rate | Items in "Blocked" state / total in-progress |