Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for Multiversal. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything.
Instalação
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for Multiversal. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything.
origin
Multiversal
Automation Audit Ops
Use this when the user asks what automations are live, which jobs are broken, where overlap exists, or what tooling and connectors are actually doing useful work right now.
This is an audit-first operator skill. The job is to produce an evidence-backed inventory and a keep / merge / cut / fix-next recommendation set before rewriting anything.
Skill Stack
Pull these Multiversal-native skills into the workflow when relevant:
workspace-surface-audit for connector, MCP, hook, and app inventory
knowledge-ops when the audit needs to reconcile live repo truth with durable context
github-ops when the answer depends on CI, scheduled workflows, issues, or PR automation
multiversal-tools-cost-audit when the real problem is webhook fanout, queued jobs, or billing burn in the sibling app repo
research-ops when local inventory must be compared against current platform support or public docs
verification-loop for proving post-fix state instead of relying on assumed recovery
When to Use
user asks "what automations do I have", "what is live", "what is broken", or "what overlaps"
the task spans cron jobs, GitHub Actions, local hooks, MCP servers, connectors, wrappers, or app integrations
the user wants to know what was ported from another agent system and what still needs to be rebuilt inside Multiversal
the workspace has accumulated multiple ways to do the same thing and the user wants one canonical lane
Guardrails
start read-only unless the user explicitly asked for fixes
separate:
configured
authenticated
recently verified
stale or broken
missing entirely
do not claim a tool is live just because a skill or config references it
do not merge or delete overlapping surfaces until the evidence table exists
Workflow
1. Inventory the real surface
Read the current live surface before theorizing:
repo hooks and local hook scripts
GitHub Actions and scheduled workflows
MCP configs and enabled servers
connector- or app-backed integrations
wrapper scripts and repo-specific automation entrypoints
Group them by surface:
local runtime
repo CI / automation
connected external systems
messaging / notifications
billing / customer operations
research / monitoring
2. Classify each item by live state
For every surfaced automation, mark:
configured
authenticated
recently verified
stale or broken
missing
Then classify the problem type:
active breakage
auth outage
stale status
overlap or redundancy
missing capability
3. Trace the proof path
Back every important claim with a concrete source:
file path
workflow run
hook log
config entry
recent command output
exact failure signature
If the current state is ambiguous, say so directly instead of pretending the audit is complete.
4. End with keep / merge / cut / fix-next
For each overlapping or suspect surface, return one call:
keep
merge
cut
fix next
The value is in collapsing noisy automation into one canonical Multiversal lane, not in preserving every historical path.
Output Format
CURRENT SURFACE
- automation
- source
- live state
- proof
FINDINGS
- active breakage
- overlap
- stale status
- missing capability
RECOMMENDATION
- keep
- merge
- cut
- fix next
NEXT Multiversal MOVE
- exact skill / hook / workflow / app lane to strengthen
Pitfalls
do not answer from memory when the live inventory can be read
do not treat "present in config" as "working"
do not fix lower-value redundancy before naming the broken high-signal path
do not widen the task into a repo rewrite if the user asked for inventory first
Verification
important claims cite a live proof path
each surfaced automation is labeled with a clear live-state category
the final recommendation distinguishes keep / merge / cut / fix-next