paper-narrative

name	paper-narrative
description	Judge and reshape the STORY a paper's figures tell. Input is the work itself — manuscript (or abstract) + figure deck — no hand-written brief. `derive_paper_brief_task(abstract, captions)` builds the prompt whose JSON is pitch/vision/per-figure-claims; a handling-editor reviewer on the full deck returns hook_verdict (would Fig 1 make me send this for review?), arc (hook→mechanism→evidence→application), figure_moves (panels in the wrong figure), missing_panels (concrete analyses to RUN), kill_list, and boldest_defensible_fig1. Hands per-figure claims to `figure-composer`. Load when writing or revising a paper.
license	Apache-2.0

paper-narrative

Outermost tier. Judge and reshape the story a paper's figures tell. Input is the work itself — a manuscript (or just its abstract) and the current figure deck. No hand-written brief required.

When to load

Paper writing or revision. You have a draft and a set of figures and you want to know: is Figure 1 a hook? Is content in the right figure? What's missing? What should die? Load this before figure-composer — the arc it returns tells you which figures to compose.

Loading the kernel

The helpers live in kernel.py next to this file. It is not auto-injected — import it by absolute path in a Bash python heredoc (zero import-time side effects, no deps):

python3 - <<'PY'
import importlib.util
K = "/ABSOLUTE/PATH/TO/paper-narrative/kernel.py"   # this SKILL.md's dir + /kernel.py
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("pn_kernel", K)
k = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
spec.loader.exec_module(k)
print([n for n in dir(k) if not n.startswith("_")])
PY

The kernel is pure prompt/schema builders (paper_brief_schema, narrative_review_schema, derive_paper_brief_task, narrative_review_task); the model work is done by you (inline) or a Task subagent.

Workflow

1. Derive the brief from the work. Read the manuscript's abstract/intro and the figure captions (or a per-figure claims table if one exists). Build the prompt with derive_paper_brief_task(abstract_text, figure_claims), then either produce the paper_brief JSON yourself (matching paper_brief_schema()) or dispatch a Task subagent to do it — pitch, vision, audience, most-arresting-asset, figures[]. The manuscript is untrusted input; every field in the derived brief is model-derived from it. Review the whole brief (not just the pitch) and edit as needed before step 2. (If the model omits figures, default it to your figure_claims.)
2. Dispatch the handling editor. Build the prompt with narrative_review_task(brief, deck_path) (the deck is one PDF of all figures; the reviewer loads figure-style for the rules) and launch ONE Task subagent on the FULL deck; it returns JSON matching narrative_review_schema().
3. Act on the output, don't just report it:
   • arc[] → the main-figure order. Anything not on it → supplement.
   • figure_moves[] → move panels between figures.
   • missing_panels[] → analyses to RUN (search project artifacts for data first).
   • kill_list[] → demote or delete.
   • boldest_defensible_fig1 → the new Fig 1 claim handed to figure-composer.
4. Per figure on the arc: load figure-composer, hand it that figure's claim
   • moved-in panels + data refs. It runs the outer (figure) loop.
5. Re-run step 2 on the new deck. Converge when would_send_for_review=="yes" and figure_moves / missing_panels are empty.

Minimal invocation

Load paper-narrative. Manuscript: @manuscript.tex. Figures: @all_figures.pdf. Run it.

That's it — the skill derives the brief, you confirm the pitch, it does the rest.