Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.
Ask:
1. What data was the model trained on?
2. Are there underrepresented groups?
3. What are the failure modes?
4. Who might be harmed by errors?
5. Have we tested with diverse inputs?
6. What demographic slices show performance gaps?
7. Are there proxy variables that encode bias?
Bias Categories
Type
Description
Example
Selection Bias
Training data not representative
Hiring model trained only on past hires
Measurement Bias
Flawed data collection
Self-reported data with social desirability
Algorithmic Bias
Model amplifies patterns
Recommendation loops
Presentation Bias
UI choices influence perception
Image ordering in search results
AI Transparency & Documentation
Model Card Template
## Model Card: [Model Name]### Model Details-**Developer**: [Organization]
-**Version**: [Version number]
-**Type**: [Classification/Generation/etc.]
-**License**: [License terms]
### Intended Use-**Primary use cases**: [Description]
-**Out-of-scope uses**: [What NOT to use it for]
-**Users**: [Target users]
### Training Data-**Sources**: [Data sources]
-**Size**: [Dataset size]
-**Known limitations**: [Data gaps]
### Performance-**Metrics**: [Evaluation metrics]
-**Sliced analysis**: [Performance by demographic groups]
-**Failure modes**: [Known failure patterns]
### Ethical Considerations-**Risks**: [Potential harms]
-**Mitigations**: [Steps taken]
-**Human oversight**: [Review processes]
AI Feature Transparency (User-Facing)
## How This AI Works**What it does**: [Clear description]
**What it doesn't do**: [Limitations]
**Data used**: [What inputs, how stored]
**Human oversight**: [When humans review]
**How to appeal**: [Process for disputes]
**Confidence indicators**: [How certainty is communicated]
Human-AI Collaboration
Appropriate Reliance Framework
State
Description
Signal
Over-reliance
Blind acceptance
User never questions AI
Appropriate reliance
Calibrated trust
User verifies when uncertain
Under-reliance
Excessive skepticism
User ignores useful AI output
Design for Appropriate Reliance
Show confidence levels — Don't present all outputs as equally certain
Explain reasoning — Help users evaluate AI logic
Enable challenge — Make it easy to question or override
Provide alternatives — Show multiple options when available
Track calibration — Monitor if users trust appropriately
Risk-based classification; prohibited AI systems banned Aug 2025; GPAI (general-purpose AI) rules apply 2025+; full obligations for high-risk AI by Aug 2026
EU AI Act Risk Tiers (Active 2025+)
Tier
Examples
Status
Unacceptable Risk (prohibited)
Social scoring, real-time biometric surveillance
Banned since Aug 2, 2025
High Risk
Employment AI, credit scoring, medical devices
Conformity assessment + registration required
Limited Risk
Chatbots, deepfakes
Transparency obligations (must disclose AI)
Minimal Risk
Spam filters, AI games
No mandatory requirements
For AI product builders: Check if your AI system classifies as "high risk" — if yes, you need a risk management system, data governance plan, human oversight mechanisms, and EU registration before market launch (deadline: Aug 2026).