| name | core-graphical-applications |
| title | Core Graphical Applications |
| version | 1 |
| status | active |
| owners | [] |
| triggers | ["terminal app","file manager","settings app","installer"] |
| prerequisites | ["peony-toolkit-development","ui-ux-review","test-strategy"] |
| related_docs | ["UI_GUIDELINES.md","docs/development/application-development.md","ROADMAP.md"] |
| category | Graphics and Peony |
| conditional_skills | ["package-update-architecture","shell-core-utilities","vfs-filesystems"] |
| implementation_gates | ["Each app is blocked by its named service and toolkit dependencies; mockups are not implementation."] |
| related_milestones | ["M5 Graphical Stack","M6 Developer Preview"] |
| last_verified | {"base_commit":"d21a477","date":"2026-07-16","worktree_dirty":true,"context":"base commit plus uncommitted audit and agent-system worktree"} |
| description | Use when working on terminal app, file manager, settings app; provides the FinnOS-specific core graphical applications workflow and evidence gates. |
Core Graphical Applications
1. Name
core-graphical-applications (Graphics and Peony; skill maturity: planning-gated).
2. Purpose
Build terminal, file manager, settings, viewer/editor, monitor, and later installer behind explicit dependency gates.
3. When to use this skill
Use for requests mentioning terminal app, file manager, settings app, installer, or when a dependency points to this skill. Load only after repository entry and before design or implementation.
4. When not to use this skill
Each app is blocked by its named service and toolkit dependencies; mockups are not implementation. Do not load it only because a future FinnOS document mentions the subsystem.
5. Prerequisite skills
peony-toolkit-development
ui-ux-review
test-strategy
Read the full prerequisite closure in topological dependency order. If one cannot be satisfied, move the task to Blocked or Deferred; do not omit the dependency.
Conditional skills:
- shell-core-utilities for terminal
- vfs-filesystems for file manager
- package-update-architecture only for installer/package UI
Implementation gates are roadmap/runtime conditions, not additional documents to load automatically:
- Each app is blocked by its named service and toolkit dependencies; mockups are not implementation.
6. Authoritative repository references
UI_GUIDELINES.md
docs/development/application-development.md
ROADMAP.md
Re-read implementation and tests referenced by those documents. The documents establish intent/status boundaries, not runtime proof.
7. Current FinnOS context
No graphical application or application SDK exists.
Registry verification used base commit d21a477 plus the dirty worktree context "base commit plus uncommitted audit and agent-system worktree" on 2026-07-16. This is not an integrated-revision claim. Reverify after HEAD, active PRs, or relevant source changes.
8. Required inputs
- User request or issue with desired outcome and architecture/profile scope.
- Current
git status, recent history, active related issue/PR, and selected roadmap item.
- Relevant implementation, tests, invariants, ADRs, and exact baseline output.
- Toolchain/firmware/hardware versions when behavior crosses those boundaries.
9. Expected outputs
An evidence-backed core graphical applications result with scoped artifacts, tests, documentation, and handoff. Include acceptance evidence, residual limitations, and next dependency rather than only code.
10. Step-by-step workflow
- Verify toolkit/runtime/package API is usable
- Implement terminal after shell/process PTY-equivalent
- Implement file manager after VFS
- Implement settings/monitor from bounded service APIs
- Defer installer until persistent image/recovery exists
- Run the narrow regression, then all required subsystem/repository checks.
- Update canonical docs/status and finish the agent-handoff template.
11. Repository-specific commands
./tools/finn check
Run commands from the repository root. A command listed here is a baseline/gate, not evidence that absent future functionality has a runnable target.
12. Architecture considerations
State shared semantics explicitly; isolate x86-64 and ARM64 mechanisms.
State guest architecture separately from host architecture and emulator model. Maintain a parity row for changed semantics and document intentional differences.
13. Safety constraints
Preserve the boundary described by the current state: No graphical application or application SDK exists. Apply .agents/checklists/pre-change.md; for kernel, driver, security, architecture, or UI work also apply the matching checklist.
14. Testing requirements
Make Defer installer until persistent image/recovery exists observable with a negative case, then run the narrow and aggregate gates. Do not permanently hard-code test counts; counts belong to dated evidence reports.
15. Documentation requirements
Update the canonical behavior/status document, relevant architecture/reference material, test/build instructions, limitations, and this skill registry if any command, gate, or current-context statement changes.
16. Review checklist
17. Completion criteria
18. Common failure modes
- Starting from an audit statement instead of re-reading changed source and tests.
- Using a successful compile or marker as evidence for a broader subsystem claim.
- Ignoring this skill's current constraint: No graphical application or application SDK exists.
- Changing shared policy while testing only one architecture or one happy path.
- Losing the exact failing artifact/log by rebuilding before capture.
19. Forbidden shortcuts
- Do not weaken, delete, reorder, or broaden validators merely to make a test pass.
- Do not claim ARM64, physical hardware, userspace, Peony, security, or release support without its own acceptance evidence.
- Do not bypass a named prerequisite by embedding a temporary incompatible abstraction.
- Do not commit target/, build/out/, firmware, credentials, local paths, or unreviewed generated output.
- Do not disregard the roadmap/status gate: Each app is blocked by its named service and toolkit dependencies; mockups are not implementation.
20. Handoff requirements
Use .agents/templates/handoff-template.md. Include objective, starting/final Git state, task state, skills used, files, exact commands/results, evidence classification, docs/status changes, unknowns, blockers, risks, next action, and next skills. Distinguish locally verified worktree changes from integrated behavior.
21. Examples
Request: "Work on terminal app." Correct response: begin by verify toolkit/runtime/package api is usable, then implement terminal after shell/process pty-equivalent, and require evidence for defer installer until persistent image/recovery exists before changing status. Incorrect response: create a plausible subsystem scaffold and mark the roadmap item complete because it compiles.
22. Skill maintenance notes
Canonical source: .agents/scripts/skill_registry.py. Increment version for material policy/workflow/gate changes, update last_verified only after reinspection, run python3 .agents/scripts/render_skills.py, review generated diffs, then run python3 .agents/scripts/validate.py --all. Follow .agents/GOVERNANCE.md; never hand-edit generated skills.