| name | competitor-analysis |
| description | Agents should invoke this skill when comparing competing products, services, libraries, tools, vendors, or approaches for market/product positioning, feature matrices, strategic trade-offs, pricing, adoption, or differentiation. |
Competitor Analysis
Research competitive landscape and produce actionable comparisons.
Product stream vs market stream
Split investigation to mirror parallel research patterns; merge before strategic recommendations.
| Stream | Focus | Typical sources |
|---|
| Product | Feature matrix, specs, APIs, pricing tables, integrations, release cadence | Official docs, changelogs, pricing pages, registries |
| Market | Positioning, messaging, ICP, reviews, sentiment, analyst takes, share/narrative | G2/Capterra, HN/Reddit, landing copy, news, reports |
Execution: Run both streams in parallel (batched searches/fetches per stream) when possible. If using subagents, assign one stream per worker with a fixed handoff schema (bullets + URLs); one synthesis pass produces Steps 3–6 below.
Process
Step 1 — Define Scope
**Subject:** [What product/feature we're analyzing]
**Competitors to evaluate:** [Specific names, or "discover competitors"]
**Purpose:** [What decision this informs]
**Dimensions:** [Features, pricing, UX, performance, target audience]
Step 2 — Discover Competitors
Assign discovery to both streams: product-side (direct substitutes, OSS alternatives) and market-side (who buyers compare you to in reviews and “vs” articles).
If competitors aren't specified:
- Search for "[category] alternatives"
- Check comparison sites (G2, AlternativeTo, Product Hunt)
- Search GitHub for open-source alternatives
- Check Hacker News and Reddit for community recommendations
- Review industry reports and analyst coverage
Step 3 — Feature Matrix (product stream)
## Feature Comparison
| Feature | Our Product | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Feature 1] | Yes | Yes | No | Partial |
| [Feature 2] | Planned | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| [Feature 3] | No | No | Yes | No |
| **Pricing** | [model] | [model] | [model] | [model] |
| **Target audience** | [who] | [who] | [who] | [who] |
| **Open source** | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No |
Step 4 — Positioning Analysis (market stream)
For each competitor:
### [Competitor Name]
**Positioning:** [How they describe themselves]
**Target audience:** [Who they serve]
**Key differentiator:** [What makes them unique]
**Strengths:** [Where they excel]
**Weaknesses:** [Where they fall short]
**Pricing:** [Model and price points]
**Community/adoption:** [Size, activity, notable users]
**Threat level:** [High / Medium / Low — to our product]
Step 5 — Strategic Insights (merge)
Reconcile product facts with market narrative (e.g. a feature exists but messaging downplays it).
## Market Insights
### Gaps in the Market
- [Opportunity that no competitor addresses well]
### Table Stakes
- [Features every competitor has — we need these too]
### Differentiators Available
- [Areas where we can uniquely differentiate]
### Risks
- [Competitive risks to monitor]
Step 6 — Recommendation
## Recommendation
Based on the competitive landscape:
1. [Product strategy recommendation]
2. [Feature priority recommendation]
3. [Positioning recommendation]
Source Quality
For competitor analysis, prioritize:
- Official product pages and documentation
- Independent reviews (G2, Capterra)
- Community discussions (Reddit, HN, forums)
- Blog posts and comparisons (check for bias/sponsorship)
Scout skill — Competitor analysis and market research · P1 product/market streams: 2026-04-10
