| name | review-brand |
| user-invocable | false |
| version | 1.0.1 |
| author | Gabriel Trabanco <gtrabanco@users.noreply.github.com> |
| license | MIT |
| description | Internal brand & copy review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks changed user-facing copy against the project's brand doc: voice, terminology, and honesty of claims — applies only to surfaces with user-facing text. Findings only; never edits code.
|
Review Brand & Copy (internal)
Composed by review-change / product-audit within their conversation — on any
agent, follow this file inline as the routed step. Findings only; never edits,
never refactors.
Scope
The diff or path/glob the caller passes; default the current change vs the
default branch. State the scope at the top of the returned table.
Checklist (evaluate EVERY item — none is optional; n/a must be stated)
- ✓ Read the project's brand doc first (e.g.
docs/brand/BRAND.md) — cite the
rule for every finding; n/a all items if the project has none and say so
- ✓ Tone of changed copy matches the declared voice (cite the guideline violated)
- ✓ Product/domain terms used consistently with the declared glossary (same
concept, same word, same capitalization)
- ✓ No forbidden/deprecated phrases from the brand doc
- ✓ Claims are honest: limits, restrictions, and reductions the code enforces
are disclosed in the copy (an undisclosed limitation is a major finding —
repo hard rule)
- ✓ Error/empty-state copy is actionable (says what happened and what to do),
not blame-y
- ✓ Consistency across the changed surface and its siblings (same action
labeled the same way everywhere)
- ✓ Placeholder/lorem text absent from the diff
Return exactly
REVIEW BRAND — scope: <scope>
| # | Finding | Sev | Evidence | Suggested fix |
|---|---------|-----|----------|---------------|
| 1 | <what> | critical|major|minor | <file:line> | <smallest action> |
Checklist: <n> evaluated, <n> pass, <n> findings, <n> n/a (<which + why>)
Summary: <1-2 sentences>
Decision: PASS | FAIL
FAIL if any critical or major finding is open; PASS otherwise. Minor findings
never block — they route to the caller's triage step.
Done when
- Every checklist item was evaluated with evidence (file:line or command output)
or explicitly marked n/a with the reason.
- The fixed-format block above is returned — nothing more, nothing less — and
no code was changed.
