agent-introspection-debugging

name	agent-introspection-debugging
description	Structured 4-phase self-debug for failing agent runs (looping, drifting, burning tokens). Capture, diagnose, contained recovery, report. Complements /investigate (which is for code bugs); this skill is for harness/agent failures.
allowed-tools	["Bash","Read","Grep","Glob","AskUserQuestion"]

/agent-introspection-debugging — Self-Debug for Failing Agent Runs

Adapted from affaan-m/everything-claude-code/skills/agent-introspection-debugging.

This is the harness/agent failure companion to /investigate (TAOM-specific code bugs). When the failing thing is the agent itself — looping, drifting, burning tokens without progress — use this skill to debug the agent before debugging the code.

When to use

• An agent run hits its retry budget (e.g., /build-fix 4-attempt limit)
• A subagent (/deep-review, feature-builder, codex-rescue) reports failures with no useful output
• Multiple consecutive tool calls return errors with no forward progress
• Context growth or drift is degrading output quality (e.g., responses become repetitive, instructions ignored)
• File-system or environment state mismatch between expectation and reality
• Tool failures that look likely-recoverable with a smaller corrective action

When NOT to use

• For TAOM code bugs (Harmony failures, GameModel misbehavior, etc.) → use /investigate
• For build errors that the retry budget hasn't yet exhausted → use /build-fix
• For verifying completed work → use /deep-review
• When you don't actually know what's failing → first surface the symptoms via plain investigation, then invoke this skill once you have specifics

Four-Phase Loop

Phase 1: Failure Capture

Before retrying anything, record the failure precisely. Most agent failures are made worse by re-running blind — the second attempt has the same context as the first plus a wasted run.

Capture:

Item	Why
What was the agent attempting? (one sentence)	Frames everything else
What went wrong? (exact error, last useful tool result, last meaningful agent output)	Distinguishes "tool error" from "model drift"
What had the agent done in the N tool calls before failure? (high level, not full transcript)	Catches context exhaustion / loop patterns
What did the agent output OR plan to output that didn't make sense?	Catches drift before re-running re-derives the same wrong plan
Token usage / context % (if visible from status line)	Distinguishes "out of room" from "stuck on logic"

Output of Phase 1: a single paragraph plus the literal failure string. Don't skip — Phase 2 needs it.

Phase 2: Diagnose Against Known Patterns

Match the captured failure against this checklist before forming a new hypothesis:

Pattern	Signature	Recovery
Retry-budget exhaustion	Same error text repeating across 3+ attempts	The fix isn't in the local file — escalate to /investigate for root cause, or to user
Stale-file mismatch	Edit tool returns "string not found" but the string is visibly there	Re-Read the file (per csharp-architecture.md stale-file rule); something modified it since the last Read
Context exhaustion	Output becomes truncated, repetitive, or skips instructions	/compact or invoke /context-save then start a fresh session
Tool not found / env failure	command not found, permission denied, path does not exist	Per environment-failures.md: report, don't fix — escalate to user
Subagent loop	A spawned agent returned an output that triggers another spawn of the same agent	Stop spawning. Address whatever the agent's output asks for in the parent context.
Inline-hook block	Edit blocked by [freeze] deny message	The freeze boundary is doing its job; either widen scope (/freeze again with broader path), /unfreeze, or accept that this edit is out of scope
MCP server unhealthy	MCP tool calls timeout or return MCP-level errors	Check mcp-health-check.sh log; the hook will block calls to flagged servers for 60s. Wait or invoke a different tool.
Permission prompt loop	User keeps being asked the same permission	Add the action to .claude/settings.local.json allowlist via /update-config
Hallucinated tool / API	Agent calls a tool name or API that doesn't exist	Tool typo OR agent confused about available tools. Stop, list available tools, invoke correctly.
Plan drift	Agent's stated plan doesn't match what it's doing	Re-state the original task explicitly; if the agent rejects it, hand control back to user

If the failure matches a pattern, jump to Phase 3 with the corresponding recovery. If no pattern matches, proceed to Phase 3 with a fresh hypothesis.

Phase 3: Contained Recovery

Apply the smallest corrective action. Do not retry the original failing action with the same context — that's the loop trap.

Bias toward:

• Smaller scope — if the agent failed on 5 files, retry on 1
• Fresh context — if context exhausted, save state then start clean (/context-save → new session → /context-restore)
• Different tool — if Edit failed, try Write. If Bash failed, try a smaller scoped command. If Glob failed, try Grep.
• Human in the loop — if 3 hypotheses fail, stop and surface to user with full Phase 1+2 output. The cost of a 30-second user clarification is much less than a fourth wrong attempt.

The recovery action MUST be something genuinely different from the original failing attempt — not a slight rewording of the same approach.

Phase 4: Introspection Report

Whether the recovery succeeded or escalated to user, output a structured debug report:

AGENT INTROSPECTION REPORT
====================================
Original task:    [what the agent was trying to do]
Failure mode:     [from Phase 2's table, or "novel pattern: <description>"]
Captured signal:  [the literal error or output that surfaced the failure]
Recovery taken:   [the contained action from Phase 3]
Outcome:          RECOVERED | ESCALATED_TO_USER | STILL_BLOCKED
Cost saved:       [rough estimate: how many wrong-direction tool calls would have happened without this introspection]
Pattern to add:   [if Phase 2 had no matching pattern, propose what to add to the table]
====================================

If the failure mode was novel and recurring is plausible, propose adding it to:

• This SKILL.md's Phase 2 table (most patterns)
• .claude/rules/harness-facts.md (if it's a load-semantic / lifecycle finding)
• feedback_*.md memory entry (if it's a TAOM-specific lesson)

Pair with

• /investigate — for code bugs; this skill is for agent/harness bugs. The boundary is: if a fresh agent in a fresh session would hit the same problem, it's a code bug → /investigate. If only THIS agent's drift causes it, it's an agent failure → THIS skill.
• /freeze / /unfreeze — Phase 3 recoveries that scope-lock or release
• /context-save / /context-restore — Phase 3 recoveries for context exhaustion
• /compact — same
• /codex-rescue — when the in-session agent can't recover, hand off to Codex (out-of-band, fresh context)

Notes

• This skill is read-only by design. It does NOT make code changes — recoveries either re-attempt with smaller scope or escalate.
• The Phase 2 table is the most important asset; extend it whenever you encounter a novel pattern. The table loses value if it becomes stale.
• Don't run this skill recursively — if introspection itself is failing, escalate immediately to the user.