research

name	research
description	Full research cycle — refines query, calls Gemini Deep Research, polls, delivers report. Combines /research-request + /research-respond. Triggers: "research this topic", "run a research cycle", "call Gemini Deep Research".
version	2
tier	lightweight

Full research cycle — refines query, calls Gemini Deep Research, polls, delivers report. [!!!] CRITICAL BOOT SEQUENCE:

1. LOAD STANDARDS: IF NOT LOADED, Read ~/.claude/directives/COMMANDS.md, ~/.claude/directives/INVARIANTS.md, and ~/.claude/directives/TAGS.md.
2. GUARD: "Quick task"? NO SHORTCUTS. See ¶INV_SKILL_PROTOCOL_MANDATORY.
3. EXECUTE: FOLLOW THE PROTOCOL BELOW EXACTLY.

⛔ GATE CHECK — Do NOT proceed to Phase 0 until ALL are filled in:

Output this block in chat with every blank filled:

Boot proof:

• COMMANDS.md — §CMD spotted: ________
• INVARIANTS.md — ¶INV spotted: ________
• TAGS.md — §FEED spotted: ________

[!!!] If ANY blank above is empty: STOP. Go back to step 1 and load the missing file. Do NOT read Phase 0 until every blank is filled.

Research Protocol (Full Lifecycle — Request + Fulfill)

[!!!] DO NOT USE THE BUILT-IN PLAN MODE (EnterPlanMode tool). This protocol has its own planning system — Phase 2 (Interrogation / Query Refinement). The engine's artifacts live in the session directory as reviewable files, not in a transient tool state. Use THIS protocol's phases, not the IDE's.

0. Setup Phase

1. Intent: Execute §CMD_REPORT_INTENT_TO_USER.

   1. I am starting Phase 0: Setup phase.
   2. I will §CMD_USE_ONLY_GIVEN_CONTEXT for Phase 0 only (Strict Bootloader — expires at Phase 1).
   3. My focus is RESEARCH (§CMD_REFUSE_OFF_COURSE applies).
   4. I will §CMD_LOAD_AUTHORITY_FILES to ensure all templates and standards are loaded.
   5. I will §CMD_FIND_TAGGED_FILES to identify active alerts (#active-alert).
   6. I will §CMD_PARSE_PARAMETERS to define the flight plan.
   7. I will §CMD_MAINTAIN_SESSION_DIR to establish working space.
   8. I will §CMD_ASSUME_ROLE to execute better: Role: You are the Research Strategist. Goal: To craft a precise research question, get it answered by Gemini Deep Research, and deliver the result. Mindset: A good research question is half the answer. Spend time refining before firing.
   9. I will obey §CMD_NO_MICRO_NARRATION and ¶INV_CONCISE_CHAT (Silence Protocol).

   Constraint: Do NOT read any project files (source code, docs) in Phase 0. Only load the required system templates/standards.

2. Required Context: Execute §CMD_LOAD_AUTHORITY_FILES (multi-read) for the following files:

   • ~/.claude/skills/research-request/SKILL.md (Request posting protocol — Phase 3 reuses steps)
   • ~/.claude/skills/research-respond/assets/TEMPLATE_RESEARCH_RESPONSE.md (Template for the response document)
   • ~/.claude/skills/research-request/assets/TEMPLATE_RESEARCH_LOG.md (Template for session logging)

3. Parse parameters: Execute §CMD_PARSE_PARAMETERS - output parameters to the user as you parsed it.

   • CRITICAL: You must output the JSON BEFORE proceeding to any other step.

4. Session Location: Execute §CMD_MAINTAIN_SESSION_DIR - ensure the directory is created.

5. Scope: Understand the [Topic] and [Goal].

6. Identify Recent Truth: Execute §CMD_FIND_TAGGED_FILES for #active-alert.

   • If any files are found, add them to contextPaths for ingestion in Phase 1.

§CMD_VERIFY_PHASE_EXIT — Phase 0

Output this block in chat with every blank filled:

Phase 0 proof:

• Role: ________
• Session dir: ________
• Templates loaded: ________, ________
• Parameters parsed: ________

Phase 0 always proceeds to Phase 1 — no transition question needed.

---

1. Context Ingestion

Load relevant materials before refining the query.

Intent: Execute §CMD_REPORT_INTENT_TO_USER.

1. I am moving to Phase 1: Context Ingestion.
2. I will §CMD_INGEST_CONTEXT_BEFORE_WORK to ask for and load contextPaths.

Action: Execute §CMD_INGEST_CONTEXT_BEFORE_WORK.

§CMD_VERIFY_PHASE_EXIT — Phase 1

Output this block in chat with every blank filled:

Phase 1 proof:

• RAG session-search: ________ results or unavailable
• RAG doc-search: ________ results or unavailable
• Files loaded: ________ files
• User confirmed: yes / no

Phase Transition

Execute §CMD_TRANSITION_PHASE_WITH_OPTIONAL_WALKTHROUGH: completedPhase: "1: Context Ingestion" nextPhase: "2: Query Refinement" prevPhase: "0: Setup" custom: "Skip to 3: Execute Research | Question is already well-defined, skip refinement"

---

2. The Interrogation (Query Refinement)

Refine the research question through structured dialogue.

Intent: Execute §CMD_REPORT_INTENT_TO_USER.

1. I am moving to Phase 2: Query Refinement.
2. I will §CMD_EXECUTE_INTERROGATION_PROTOCOL to refine the research question.
3. I will §CMD_LOG_TO_DETAILS to capture the Q&A.
4. If I get stuck, I'll §CMD_ASK_USER_IF_STUCK.

Interrogation Depth Selection

Before asking any questions, present this choice via AskUserQuestion (multiSelect: false):

"How deep should query refinement go?"

Depth	Minimum Rounds	When to Use
Short	3+	Question is mostly clear, just needs minor sharpening
Medium	6+	Moderate ambiguity, multiple angles to consider
Long	9+	Complex multi-faceted topic, many constraints
Absolute	Until ALL questions resolved	Novel domain, high-stakes research, zero ambiguity tolerance

Record the user's choice. This sets the minimum — the agent can always ask more, and the user can always say "proceed" after the minimum is met.

Interrogation Protocol (Rounds)

[!!!] CRITICAL: You MUST complete at least the minimum rounds for the chosen depth. Track your round count visibly.

Round counter: Output it on every round: "Round N / {depth_minimum}+"

Topic selection: Pick from the topic menu below each round. Do NOT follow a fixed sequence — choose the most relevant uncovered topic based on what you've learned so far.

Interrogation Topics (Research)

Examples of themes to explore. Adapt to the task — skip irrelevant ones, invent new ones as needed.

Standard topics (typically covered once):

• Core question — What exactly do you want to know? What prompted this?
• Scope & depth — How broad or narrow? Survey vs deep dive? Time range?
• Source quality — Academic papers, official docs, blog posts, code examples? Preference?
• Prior knowledge — What do you already know? What have you already tried?
• Output format — Report, summary, comparison table, decision matrix, annotated bibliography?
• Audience — Who will read this? Technical depth appropriate?
• Timeline — How current must sources be? Historical context needed?
• Known unknowns — What specific gaps are you trying to fill?
• Related topics — Adjacent areas that might be relevant?
• Success criteria — How will you know the research answered your question?

Repeatable topics (can be selected any number of times):

• Followup — Clarify or revisit answers from previous rounds
• Devil's advocate — Challenge assumptions and decisions made so far
• What-if scenarios — Explore hypotheticals, edge cases, and alternative futures
• Deep dive — Drill into a specific topic from a previous round in much more detail

Each round:

1. Pick an uncovered topic (or a repeatable topic).
2. Execute §CMD_ASK_ROUND_OF_QUESTIONS via AskUserQuestion (3-5 targeted questions on that topic).
3. On response: Execute §CMD_LOG_TO_DETAILS immediately.
4. Also log a Query Refinement entry to the session log via §CMD_APPEND_LOG_VIA_BASH_USING_TEMPLATE.
5. If the user asks a counter-question: ANSWER it, verify understanding, then resume.

If this is a follow-up: Also ask which previous response to continue from. Read it to extract the Interaction ID.

Interrogation Exit Gate

After reaching minimum rounds, present this choice via AskUserQuestion (multiSelect: true):

"Round N complete (minimum met). What next?"

• "Proceed to Phase 3: Execute Research" — (terminal: if selected, skip all others and move on)
• "More interrogation (3 more rounds)" — Standard topic rounds, then this gate re-appears
• "Devil's advocate round" — 1 round challenging assumptions, then this gate re-appears
• "What-if scenarios round" — 1 round exploring hypotheticals, then this gate re-appears
• "Deep dive round" — 1 round drilling into a prior topic, then this gate re-appears

Execution order (when multiple selected): Standard rounds first → Devil's advocate → What-ifs → Deep dive → re-present exit gate.

For Absolute depth: Do NOT offer the exit gate until you have zero remaining questions. Ask: "Round N complete. I still have questions about [X]. Continuing..."

§CMD_VERIFY_PHASE_EXIT — Phase 2

Output this block in chat with every blank filled:

Phase 2 proof:

• Depth chosen: ________
• Rounds completed: ________ / ________+
• DETAILS.md entries: ________
• Research question defined: ________

---

3. Post Request & Execute Research

Create the request document, then immediately fulfill it.

Intent: Execute §CMD_REPORT_INTENT_TO_USER.

1. I am moving to Phase 3: Research Execution.
2. I will post the request document for traceability.
3. I will call Gemini Deep Research and poll for results.

⏱️ Logging Heartbeat (CHECK BEFORE EVERY TOOL CALL)

Before calling any tool, ask yourself:
  Have I made 2+ tool calls since my last log entry?
  → YES: Log NOW before doing anything else. This is not optional.
  → NO: Proceed with the tool call.

[!!!] If you make 3 tool calls without logging, you are FAILING the protocol. The log is your brain — unlogged work is invisible work.

Step 1: Post Request

Execute Phase 3 (steps 1-3) of ~/.claude/skills/research-request/SKILL.md to create the request document, tag it with #needs-research, and log the posting. Use the interrogation context already gathered in Phase 2 above — do not re-interrogate.

Step 2: Call Gemini

1. Compose: Synthesize the Query, Context, Constraints, and Expected Output from the request document into a coherent research prompt.
2. Output path: [session-dir]/research_raw_output.txt — temporary file for the script's raw output.
3. Execute (background):
   • If initial request (no previous Interaction ID):

     ~/.claude/scripts/research.sh <output-path> <<'EOF'
     [composed research prompt]
     EOF
     

   • If follow-up (Interaction ID present):

     ~/.claude/scripts/research.sh --continue <interaction-id> <output-path> <<'EOF'
     [composed follow-up prompt]
     EOF
     

   • Run with run_in_background: true. Note the task ID from the background task.

Step 3: Capture Interaction ID

The script writes INTERACTION_ID=<id> to the output file immediately (before polling starts). After a short wait (~5 seconds), read the output file to extract the ID.

1. Read: Read the output file. First line should be INTERACTION_ID=<id>.
2. Write to request: Append the interaction ID to the request file so it's recoverable:

   ~/.claude/scripts/log.sh "$REQUEST_FILE" <<'EOF'
   ## Active Research
   *   **Interaction ID**: `[interaction-id]`
   *   **Started**: [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS]
   EOF
   

3. Swap tag: #needs-research → #claimed-research on the request file:

   ~/.claude/scripts/tag.sh swap "$REQUEST_FILE" '#needs-research' '#claimed-research'
   

   This marks the request as in-flight. If this session dies, another agent can find #claimed-research requests, read the Interaction ID, and resume polling.

Step 4: Await Results

1. Inform user: "Research submitted to Gemini. Interaction ID: [id]. Watching for results via §CMD_AWAIT_TAG."
2. Watch: Execute §CMD_AWAIT_TAG (file mode) on the request file for #done-research:

   Bash("~/.claude/scripts/await-tag.sh $REQUEST_FILE '#done-research'", run_in_background=true)
   

   The research.sh script (launched in Step 2) handles polling Gemini, writing the response, and swapping the tag. await-tag.sh detects the tag swap and signals the agent.
3. Continue or Wait: The agent can either:
   • Continue other work while the research runs (the background watcher will notify on completion).
   • Wait for the watcher to complete if no other work is pending.
4. Timeout: If the session ends before results arrive, the #claimed-research tag + Interaction ID on the request file means /research-respond can pick it up in a future session.

Step 5: Post Response

1. Read the output file. Line 1 is INTERACTION_ID=<id>. Remaining lines are the report.
2. Create: Populate ~/.claude/skills/research-respond/assets/TEMPLATE_RESEARCH_RESPONSE.md with the interaction ID, original request path, and full report. Save as RESEARCH_RESPONSE_[TOPIC].md.
3. Breadcrumb: Append ## Response section to the request file via log.sh.
4. Swap Tag: #claimed-research → #done-research on the request file:

   ~/.claude/scripts/tag.sh swap "$REQUEST_FILE" '#claimed-research' '#done-research'
   

5. Cleanup: Delete research_raw_output.txt.

§CMD_VERIFY_PHASE_EXIT — Phase 3

Output this block in chat with every blank filled:

Phase 3 proof:

• Request created and tagged: ________
• Gemini called: ________
• Interaction ID captured: ________
• Response saved: ________
• Tag lifecycle complete: ________
• Raw output cleaned: ________

Phase Transition

Execute §CMD_TRANSITION_PHASE_WITH_OPTIONAL_WALKTHROUGH: completedPhase: "3: Execute Research" nextPhase: "4: Present Results" prevPhase: "2: Query Refinement"

---

4. Present Results & Debrief

Show the research results and close the session.

1. Announce Intent Execute §CMD_REPORT_INTENT_TO_USER.

1. I am moving to Phase 4: Present Results.
2. I will §CMD_PROCESS_CHECKLISTS to process any discovered CHECKLIST.md files.
3. I will present the research report.
4. I will §CMD_REPORT_RESULTING_ARTIFACTS to list outputs.
5. I will §CMD_REPORT_SESSION_SUMMARY to provide a concise session overview.

STOP: Do not create artifacts yet. You must output the block above first.

2. Execution — SEQUENTIAL, NO SKIPPING

[!!!] CRITICAL: Execute these steps IN ORDER. Do NOT skip to step 4 or 5 without completing step 1.

Step 0 (CHECKLISTS): Execute §CMD_PROCESS_CHECKLISTS — process any discovered CHECKLIST.md files. Read ~/.claude/directives/commands/CMD_PROCESS_CHECKLISTS.md for the algorithm. Skips silently if no checklists were discovered. This MUST run before the debrief to satisfy ¶INV_CHECKLIST_BEFORE_CLOSE.

Step 1 (THE DELIVERABLE): Present the research report in chat so the user can read it immediately.

Step 2: Log a Research Complete entry via §CMD_APPEND_LOG_VIA_BASH_USING_TEMPLATE.

Step 3: Archive to Docs (Optional) — Ask the user if they want to copy the research to a project docs directory for permanent reference.

• Use AskUserQuestion with options:
  • "Yes — copy to docs" (provide a suggested path like packages/[pkg]/docs/research/ or docs/research/)
  • "No — keep in session only"
• If yes:
  1. Ensure the target directory exists (mkdir -p).
  2. Copy the response file with a descriptive name.
  3. Report the copied path.

Step 4: Execute §CMD_REPORT_RESULTING_ARTIFACTS — list all created files in chat.

Step 5: Execute §CMD_REPORT_SESSION_SUMMARY — 2-paragraph summary in chat.

Step 6: Suggest follow-up options:

• "Run /research again to ask a follow-up question (will chain via Interaction ID)"
• "The research report is at [path] — reference it from any other session"

§CMD_VERIFY_PHASE_EXIT — Phase 4 (PROOF OF WORK)

Output this block in chat with every blank filled:

Phase 4 proof:

• Research report presented: ________
• Log entry written: ________
• Archive decision: ________
• Artifacts listed: ________
• Session summary: ________

If ANY blank above is empty: GO BACK and complete it before proceeding.

Post-Synthesis: If the user continues talking, obey §CMD_CONTINUE_OR_CLOSE_SESSION.