spec-workflow-write-implement

name	Spec Workflow (Write & Implement)
description	Two-phase workflow for technical specifications - WRITING phase creates and commits specs then stops; IMPLEMENTATION phase follows specs, updates status, and commits all changes. Different agents handle each phase.

Spec Workflow: Writing and Implementation

Overview

This skill supports a two-phase workflow where specification writing and implementation are handled by different agents:

1. WRITING PHASE: Create spec, commit it, STOP
2. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE: Follow spec, implement, update status, commit everything

CRITICAL: These are separate tasks. Never write AND implement in the same session.

---

Phase 1: Writing Specifications

When to use: User requests a spec to be written, or you need to document a bug/feature/system change.

Your responsibilities:

• ✅ Investigate and write the spec
• ✅ Git add and commit the spec file
• ✅ STOP - Do not implement

You must NOT:

• ❌ Implement the spec
• ❌ Write any code beyond the spec itself
• ❌ Update the spec status to "In Progress" or "Completed"

Writing Workflow

Step 1: Create timestamped spec file

# Generate timestamp and create spec
TIMESTAMP=$(date +"%y%m%d-%H%M%S")
touch specs/${TIMESTAMP}-descriptive-name.md

File naming: {YYMMDD-HHMMSS}-{kebab-case-description}.md Location: specs/ directory at project root

Step 2: Investigate thoroughly

Before proposing solutions:

1. Trace execution: Use grep/find to follow actual code paths
2. Verify assumptions: Check if functionality already exists elsewhere
3. Confirm the problem: Ensure issue exists where suspected
4. Never assume missing: Always verify before claiming something doesn't exist

Step 3: Write complete spec

Use this template:

# [Component/Feature] - [Brief Issue]

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS
**Issue:** One-line problem description
**Priority:** [High/Medium/Low]
**Status:** Requires Implementation

## Problem Statement

- Current behavior (what's broken)
- Expected behavior (what should happen)
- Impact on users/system

## Root Cause Analysis

- Technical investigation with code examples
- Why the problem exists
- Comparison with working implementations if available

## Technical Approach

- Proposed solution methodology
- High-level implementation strategy
- Rationale for chosen approach

## Implementation Details

- Specific code changes with file paths
- Step-by-step implementation plan
- Testing strategy
- All commands and dependencies needed

Step 4: Git commit and STOP

# Add the spec file only
git add specs/${TIMESTAMP}-descriptive-name.md

# Commit with descriptive message
git commit -m "spec: add specification for [brief description]

Created spec: ${TIMESTAMP}-descriptive-name.md
Status: Requires Implementation"

STOP HERE - Your work is done. Implementation will be handled by a different agent.

Writing Quality Checklist

Before committing, verify:

• Timestamp formatted correctly (YYMMDD-HHMMSS)
• File in specs/ directory at project root
• Status is "Requires Implementation"
• All required sections present
• Investigated existing code before proposing changes
• Problem statement is specific
• Root cause includes technical investigation
• Solution fixes only stated problem
• Implementation details are actionable with full file paths
• Code examples properly formatted with file:line references
• No meta-commentary or self-notes
• Self-contained for fresh agent to implement

---

Phase 2: Implementing Specifications

When to use: User requests implementation of an existing spec.

Your responsibilities:

• ✅ Read and understand the spec completely
• ✅ Implement according to the spec
• ✅ Follow all usual best practices
• ✅ Update spec status with commits
• ✅ Git add and commit all changes (spec + implementation)

You must NOT:

• ❌ Deviate from the spec without justification
• ❌ Skip updating the spec status
• ❌ Leave uncommitted changes

Implementation Workflow

Step 1: Read the spec

# Find the spec to implement
ls specs/*.md

# Read it completely
cat specs/{timestamp}-name.md

Understand:

• Problem statement
• Root cause
• Technical approach
• All implementation details
• Testing requirements

Step 2: Update spec status to "In Progress"

Edit the spec file:

**Status:** In Progress
**Started:** YYYY-MM-DD

Optional: Move to active directory

git mv specs/{spec}.md specs/active/{spec}.md

Step 3: Implement according to spec

Follow the implementation details exactly:

• Make all code changes specified
• Install any required dependencies
• Follow the step-by-step plan
• Test as specified in the spec

Follow all usual best practices:

• Write clean, maintainable code
• Add appropriate error handling
• Include comments where helpful
• Ensure type safety
• Test thoroughly

Step 4: Verify requirements

# Test the implementation
npm run dev  # or appropriate test command

# Verify all spec requirements met
# Check each item in Implementation Details section

Step 5: Update spec status to "Completed"

Edit the spec file:

**Status:** Completed
**Implementation:**
- Commit: {hash} - {message}
- Commit: {hash} - {message}
**Completed:** YYYY-MM-DD

Optional: Archive the spec

# Move to implemented archive
git mv specs/active/{spec}.md specs/archive/implemented/{spec}.md
# OR if not in active/
git mv specs/{spec}.md specs/archive/implemented/{spec}.md

Step 6: Git add and commit everything

# Add all changes (implementation + updated spec)
git add [files-you-modified]
git add specs/archive/implemented/{spec}.md  # or wherever spec is

# Commit with reference to spec
git commit -m "feat: implement [feature name]

Implements spec: {timestamp}-name.md
- [Brief description of changes]
- [Another change]

Status: Completed"

Implementation Quality Checklist

Before committing, verify:

• All spec requirements implemented
• Code follows best practices
• Tests pass / manual testing complete
• Spec status updated to "Completed"
• Spec includes commit hashes
• Spec includes completion date
• Spec archived (optional but recommended)
• All files added to git (implementation + spec)
• Commit message references spec file
• No uncommitted changes remain

---

Directory Structure

specs/
├── {timestamp}-name.md           # New specs (Status: Requires Implementation)
├── active/                        # In progress (Status: In Progress)
├── archive/
│   ├── implemented/              # Completed (Status: Completed)
│   └── deprecated/               # Obsolete (Status: Deprecated)
└── drafts/                       # Work-in-progress ideas

---

Content Guidelines

Content principles (apply to both phases):

• Write specs as final truth, not drafts
• No meta-commentary or revision history
• Include all context for fresh agent to start work
• Use code examples with file paths and line numbers
• Fix only the stated problem (no scope creep)

Code examples format:

// src/components/Example.tsx:42
const problematic = () => { /* ... */ };

// Fixed version:
const corrected = () => { /* ... */ };

---

Common Patterns

Reference existing code

## Root Cause Analysis

The issue occurs in `src/components/Button.tsx:87-92`:

\`\`\`typescript
// Current problematic implementation
const handleClick = () => {
  // Missing validation
  processData(data);
};
\`\`\`

Similar functionality in `src/components/Form.tsx:145` handles this correctly.

Provide complete context

## Implementation Details

**Files to modify**:
- `src/components/Button.tsx` - Add validation
- `src/types/index.ts` - Add new type definition

**Dependencies**:
\`\`\`bash
npm install zod
\`\`\`

**Testing**:
\`\`\`bash
npm run dev
# Navigate to http://localhost:5173/test-page
# Click button and verify validation works
\`\`\`

Break down complex changes

## Implementation Details

**Step 1: Add type definitions**
\`\`\`typescript
// src/types/validation.ts
export interface ValidationRule { /* ... */ }
\`\`\`

**Step 2: Implement validation logic**
\`\`\`typescript
// src/utils/validator.ts:1
export const validateInput = (/* ... */) => { /* ... */ }
\`\`\`

**Step 3: Integrate into component**
\`\`\`typescript
// src/components/Form.tsx:42
import { validateInput } from '@/utils/validator';
// Apply validation before submission
\`\`\`

---

Anti-patterns to Avoid

❌ Vague problem statements: "The form doesn't work right"

✅ Specific problem statements: "Form submission in src/components/ContactForm.tsx:87 allows invalid email formats to pass validation, causing 400 errors from the API"

❌ Assumed missing functionality: "We need to add validation because there is none"

✅ Verified gaps: "Searched codebase with grep -r 'emailValidation' src/ - validation exists in auth/ but not in contact/ forms"

❌ Scope creep: "Fix email validation AND redesign the form UI AND add analytics"

✅ Focused solution: "Add email validation to contact form using existing validation utilities from src/auth/validators.ts"

❌ Writing and implementing in same session: Don't create spec and immediately implement it

✅ Separate sessions: Write spec → commit → stop. Later: implement spec → update status → commit

---

Status Field Reference

During Writing Phase

**Status:** Requires Implementation

During Implementation Phase

Starting work:

**Status:** In Progress
**Started:** YYYY-MM-DD

When complete:

**Status:** Completed
**Implementation:**
- Commit: abc123 - feat: implement feature X
- Commit: def456 - fix: handle edge case in feature X
**Completed:** YYYY-MM-DD

If deprecated:

**Status:** Deprecated
**Reason:** [Brief explanation]
**Superseded By:** [Link to replacement]
**Deprecated:** YYYY-MM-DD

---

Quick Reference

I'm WRITING a spec:

1. Create timestamped file in specs/
2. Investigate thoroughly
3. Write complete spec with "Status: Requires Implementation"
4. git add specs/{spec}.md && git commit
5. STOP - Don't implement

I'm IMPLEMENTING a spec:

1. Read spec completely
2. Update status to "In Progress"
3. Implement according to spec + best practices
4. Test thoroughly
5. Update spec status to "Completed" with commits
6. git add [all-files] && git commit
7. Done

---

Notes

• Specs are living documents until archived
• Update specs if requirements change (add timestamped note at top)
• Reference spec filename in commit messages
• Self-contained specs enable any agent to implement independently
• Timestamps ensure chronological ordering and uniqueness
• The two-phase approach ensures specs are reviewed before implementation
• Different agents bring fresh perspectives to implementation