Safety patterns for working with a populated LLM-wiki / personal knowledge vault (~/llm_wiki, ~/wiki, etc.) — preventing concept-page clobber, enforcing append-not-overwrite, the default-doing-now save location for research artifacts, AND the push-to-origin-main flow when the wiki is a git repo with concurrent agent activity. Activates when the user asks to save research / a brief / top-10 / synthesis to the wiki, or asks to push the wiki to origin main. Loads alongside llm-wiki and obsidian skills.
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.
Safety patterns for working with a populated LLM-wiki / personal knowledge vault (~/llm_wiki, ~/wiki, etc.) — preventing concept-page clobber, enforcing append-not-overwrite, the default-doing-now save location for research artifacts, AND the push-to-origin-main flow when the wiki is a git repo with concurrent agent activity. Activates when the user asks to save research / a brief / top-10 / synthesis to the wiki, or asks to push the wiki to origin main. Loads alongside llm-wiki and obsidian skills.
version
1.2.0
author
Hermes Agent
license
MIT
platforms
["linux","macos"]
changelog
["1.2.0 (2026-07-28): Two new pitfalls. (a) 'sources/' vs 'raw/' directory trap — workers invent `sources/articles/` because the frontmatter field is `sources:` and they confuse field-with-directory. The wiki's Layer 1 directory is ALWAYS `raw/articles/` (or `raw/papers/`, `raw/transcripts/`). A worker that wrote `sources: [\"sources/articles/mbti/ENFJ-per.html\"]` left 17 files with non-existent directory references; parent had to sed-fix all 17. (b) Concept pages without raw sources — workers that summarize N articles and write N concept pages but skip the curl-fetch into `raw/articles/<file>.<ext>` step silently break re-ingest drift detection. Lint's source-drift check (item ⑧ in llm-wiki) becomes a no-op for the skipped sources. Both pitfalls verified on 16-MBTI ingest (2026-07-28, personalitypage.com).","1.1.0 (2026-07-26): Add Failure Modes 3a-3e (cross-org push with wrong gh account, git ls-files truth over git status, stash-then-checkout pattern, journal-file rebase conflict resolution).","1.0.0 (initial): Failure Modes 1-3 (overwrite trap, default-doing-now save, push-to-origin-main)."]
Companion to the llm-wiki and obsidian skills. Those skills describe the Karpathy
pattern and Obsidian vault mechanics. This skill covers the safety patterns that
apply specifically when the vault is populated (multiple agents writing over time,
months of accumulated concept pages) and backed by a git repo (jleechanorg/llm-wiki.git,
jleechanclaw etc.) with concurrent activity.
When This Skill Activates
Load this skill when ANY of these are true:
The user asks to save, write, ingest, file, or commit a research artifact to a wiki/vault
The user asks to "push the wiki to origin main" / "commit the wiki" / "push my notes"
You're about to call write_file on a path inside ~/llm_wiki/ or ~/wiki/ or any
other markdown-vault directory
You see wiki/ or notes/ or vault/ referenced in the conversation and the wiki
is already populated (>20 markdown files)
Three Failure Modes This Skill Prevents
Failure Mode 1: Concept-page overwrite trap
Symptom: You complete the orientation routine (read SCHEMA + index + scan log), see
that concepts/HarnessEngineering.md exists with a 2026-04-14 last_updated date, and
correctly decide "the answer belongs in concepts/HarnessEngineering.md." Then you
call write_file(path='concepts/HarnessEngineering.md', content=<new content>). The
pre-existing 60+ lines of Meta-Harness paper + 4-layer architecture + OpenAI workshop
notes are silently gone. No error, no warning.
Why orientation didn't save you: The orientation routine tells you a page exists.
It does not enforce the merge-with-existing rule on write_file. write_file is a
clobber-and-replace primitive — that's its contract.
The three-step pattern before any write to a known-existing page:
Re-read the target file (read_file path=<concept>.md) immediately before
write_file. Even if you saw the path in index.md 3 turns ago, re-read — the
page may have been updated by another agent in parallel.
Diff concepts, not just filenames. If the existing page covers a different
framing of the same word (e.g. pre-existing HarnessEngineering is the
self-bootstrapping agent runtime harness; new research is the AIEWF 2026
human-org harness), the answer is .
Append-only preserves the compounding nature of the wiki.
append a section, not overwrite
When in doubt, patch not write_file. Read the existing page, find a stable
anchor (last bullet list, last heading, etc.), and patch to add a new section.
write_file is only safe for genuinely new pages or genuinely
contradicted-and-resolved content (mark with contradictions: frontmatter first).
Recovery if you clobbered: If the vault is under git (which is the assumption for
this skill), git checkout HEAD -- <path> restores the pre-write state, then re-do
the work as a patch append.
Verified session: 2026-07-14, AIEWF 2026 brief. I clobbered HarnessEngineering.md
that had the Meta-Harness paper + 4-layer architecture. Recovered via git checkout HEAD -- concepts/HarnessEngineering.md, then used patch to append a new AIEWF validation
section. Net result: +14 lines additive, zero content loss.
Failure Mode 2: Research artifact saved to /tmp, then pick-one-menu asked
Symptom: User asks "research the top 10 learnings from the conference." You write the
brief to /tmp/aiewf-2026-top-10.md (volatile), post a Slack reply with the summary,
and ask "Pick one: (a) save to wiki (b) deeper AO pull (c) LinkedIn draft." User replies
"keep going save the brief and summarize it, why did you stop."
Why this is wrong twice over: (1) /tmp/foo.md is volatile — gone on next reboot.
(2) The pick-one-menu violates SOUL.md no-pick-one-menus COMMIT explicitly.
The default-doing-now move:
Write the brief to sources/<descriptive-slug>-YYYY-MM-DD.md (or raw/articles/
per plain Karpathy-pattern vaults).
Create the 2-3 concept pages the brief implies, each with cross-references via
[[wikilinks]].
Add entries to index.md linking them.
Post a one-line summary back to the originating thread.
Do NOT ask "where should I save this?" The vault is the answer. Default-doing-now
applies. Volatile /tmp + a[REDACTED_OPENAI_KEY] is the failure mode. The user can always say
"move it elsewhere," but /tmp is wrong by default.
Failure Mode 3: Push to origin main with divergent history
Symptom: User says "push to origin main." You git status and see 3
[Auto] Pending changes commits ahead of origin/main, none of them yours. You try
git rebase origin/main and it aborts with conflicts in raw/campaigns/* that have
nothing to do with your work.
The safe pattern:
git fetch origin first — see the actual remote state.
git status --short --branch — local divergence from origin.
git log origin/main..HEAD and git diff --stat origin/main..HEAD — identify
which local commits are yours vs pre-existing.
Decision tree:
Unrelated pre-existing commits → git reset --hard origin/main then unstash
your work, commit, push. Cleaner linear history.
Your commits you want to preserve → rebase manually, resolve conflicts
file-by-file with git checkout --theirs/--ours <path> for specific hunks.
Never git checkout --theirs <index.md> wholesale — you'll lose other agents'
recent entries. Resolve index.md conflicts manually by reading both versions and
merging the additions.
Stage only your files with explicit paths, not git add -A. Untracked files
in .beads/, artifacts/, raw/ from other agents are not yours to commit.
(Verified: 50+ untracked .beads/.br_history/*.jsonl files in ~/llm_wiki from
prior sessions — none related to AIEWF brief, all left alone.)
Commit with a scoped message that names the source/session/task, then git push origin main.
Verify: git rev-parse origin/main matches local HEAD SHA.
If the vault is not under git, report that explicitly to the user and offer
git init + first-commit. Don't git push to a non-existent remote.
3a. Cross-org push when gh auth is wrong for the vault's remote
Trigger:git push origin main returns Repository not found against a remote
URL like https://github.com/Agnt-F/<repo>.git or https://github.com/<other-org>/<repo>.git,
while gh auth status shows the active account is jleechan2015 (member of
jleechanorg but NOT of the vault's org).
Why this fires:gh's HTTP-credential helper scopes the token to the active
account's accessible orgs. jleechan2015 cannot push to Agnt-F/* even if a $USER-af
account exists in 1Password/Keychain — gh only knows about one active user at a time.
The fix — token override for one push, no global config pollution:
# 1. Verify a non-gh token exists for the target org in the environment
GH_TOKEN_AGENTF="$GH_TOKEN_AGENTF" curl -sS -o /dev/null -w "HTTP %{http_code}\n" \
-H "Authorization: token $GH_TOKEN_AGENTF" -H "User-Agent: hermes-push" \
https://api.github.com/repos/Agnt-F/<repo>
# Expect HTTP 200. If 401/404 the token is wrong or has wrong scope.# 2. Push with that token via URL insteadOf + a credential helper that reads from env
git -c credential.helper='!f() { echo "username=x-access-token"; echo "password=$1"; }; f "$@"' \
-c "url.https://x-access-token:$GH_TOKEN_AGENTF@github.com/Agnt-F/<repo>.git/.insteadOf=https://github.com/Agnt-F/<repo>.git" \
push origin main
DOs / DON'Ts:
DO use GH_TOKEN_AGENTF (or whatever the org-scoped env var is) — DO NOT embed the
token in the remote URL with git remote set-url origin ....
DO scope the -c flags to the one push invocation — DO NOT git config --global.
DO verify the token with the API probe before pushing (saves a round-trip on a wrong token).
DO NOT echo the token in shell history. Use $GH_TOKEN_AGENTF directly, never echo $GH_TOKEN_AGENTF.
Companion rule: for Agnt-F/* Agnt-F vault work, load agentf skill alongside
this one — it documents the $USER-af vs jleechan2015 distinction and the
canonical token location.
3b. "Is this file already committed?" — git status lies, git ls-files is the truth
Trigger: A path appears in git status --short as ?? foo/bar.md (untracked)
on the first scan, but after git add of OTHER files it disappears from the
untracked list — and yet git ls-files foo/bar.md returns the path. If you
included the path in your git add list, it was a no-op but you also didn't double-check.
Why this fires: A race between your git status call and another agent / cron
running git add foo/bar.md && git commit mid-session. The untracked-list snippet
you snapshotted is stale by the time you stage other files.
The diagnostic:
# Before adding ANY borderline path, verify it is currently untracked
git ls-files <path> # empty output → truly untracked, safe to add
git log --all --oneline -- <path> | head -3 # see if it has commit history
The rule: when building an git add <list> command, run git ls-files <each-path>
in a parallel batch first. Paths that return a hit were already committed by another
agent — drop them from the add list. Paths that return empty are still untracked.
3c. Landmine taxonomy — pre-push checklist for untracked file lists
Trigger:git status --short lists 10+ untracked files and at least one has a
borderline name (*-recovery-*, nextsteps-*, *-audit-*, numeric ID, etc.).
Three classes of landmines recur across multi-repo pushes:
Multi-MB recovery artifact folders — dk2d-recovery-*/, */artifacts/, ao-*-*/
containing b3/, native32/, *.so, raw ffprobe dumps. NEVER push.
.beads/.br_history/*.jsonl — bead CLI history dumps that aren't in .gitignore
by default. ALWAYS skip; recommend adding .beads/.br_history/ to .gitignore in
the next session.
Auto-export cron dumps under cron/ or launchd/ — these are usually already
committed at their canonical paths, but the local working tree may have stale copies
that look untracked after a half-completed export run.
The pre-push checklist:
# 1. Size audit — anything >5 MB untracked is suspicious
git status --short | grep "^??" | awk '{print $2}' | xargs -I {} sh -c 'du -sh "{}" 2>/dev/null' | sort -h | tail -10
# 2. First-line sniff of every borderline file (.md files, by 10-line head)for f in $(git status --short | grep "^??" | awk '{print $2}' | grep '\.md$'); doecho"=== $f ==="; head -10 "$f"; echodone# 3. Stale-branch probe — confirm you're on the branch you think you are
git branch --show-current
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref --symbolic-full-name @{u} # upstream# 4. Auth probe — confirm gh-vs-target-org alignment
gh auth status | grep -E "account|Active" | head -3
If any check returns a landmine, STOP and ask the user or skip the file explicitly.
Do not git add -A and hope.
3d. Stash-then-checkout to free a dirty worktree for branch switching
Trigger: You need to git checkout main (or any branch) but the current branch
has M files that git status reports would be overwritten. The dirty files are
content you DO want to push (they correspond to commits on the current branch you'll
re-apply via cherry-pick), but git checkout refuses without commit or stash.
The pattern:
# 1. Stash ONLY the explicitly-named files (not `git stash` blanket)
git stash push -m "branch-rescue-stash" -- README.md learnings-2026-07.md
# 2. Now checkout succeeds
git checkout main
# 3. Cherry-pick the commits that originally carried those file changes
git cherry-pick <sha1> <sha2> ...
# 4. Resolve any post-cherry-pick conflicts (see 3e below)# 5. Drop the stash when the cherry-picks succeed
git stash list # confirm it's still there
git stash drop stash@{0}
DO NOT use git stash pop here — if cherry-picking conflicted, stash drop is
cleaner; stash pop would either fail or silently re-apply dirt that the merge
already covered.
3e. Rebase-onto-origin/main conflict when BOTH local-main commits AND
cherry-picked-feature-branch commits modified the same journal file
Trigger: You git rebase origin/main after fetching new remote commits, and the
rebase aborts with a <<<<<<< HEAD / ======= / >>>>>>> <sha> conflict in a file
named learnings-YYYY-MM.md, daily-log-YYYY-MM.md, or any chronological journal
where both sides added dated entries.
Why this fires: the local feature branch was branched from origin/main BEFORE
the auto-export cron added N more journal entries. After you cherry-pick the
feature-branch commits onto main, then git fetch shows origin/main has 7 more
journal entries ahead of main too. The rebase merges local-vs-remote BOTH having
new journal entries — most are unique-but-similar in shape, so git conflates them
into a hunk conflict.
The resolution rule:keep ALL dated entries from both sides, in chronological
order. Do NOT git checkout --theirs (loses your entries) or --ours (loses
remote's entries). Open the conflict block, identify each ## YYYY-MM-DD heading,
interleave them by date, drop the markers.
# After patch'ing the file with merged content:
grep -nE "^(<<<<<<<|=======|>>>>>>>)" learnings-2026-07.md | head -5
# MUST return zero matches before continuing
git add learnings-2026-07.md
git rebase --continue
If the markers still exist after patch, the rebase will silently produce a
corrupted commit — gate on grep returning zero.
Integration with Existing Skills
Load with llm-wiki when the user is doing structured research ingest. The
llm-wiki skill covers the Karpathy pattern and orientation; this skill covers the
safety + git-push layer.
Load with obsidian when the user is doing personal-note work in Obsidian.
The obsidian skill covers vault mechanics (path resolution, read/write/append,
wikilinks); this skill covers the "populated vault + git push" edge cases.
Companion to github-pr-workflow: this skill is for personal wikis, not
project repos. For project repos with branch protection and PR review, follow
the standard always-pr-never-local-edit + github-pr-workflow patterns instead.
Quick Reference: Decision Table
Situation
Action
Vault exists, target page exists, content is mine to write
User asked "push to origin main" and local is clean
git push origin main directly
Pitfalls (one-liners)
write_file clobbers — always read_file first.
Append-only by default; write_file only for genuinely new pages.
Default-doing-now: research artifacts go to vault, not /tmp.
Never git add -A in a vault repo with concurrent agent activity.
Never git checkout --theirs on index.md — merge manually.
/tmp/foo.md is a bug, not a strategy.
git status snapshot is stale — confirm git ls-files <path> before staging borderline files.
Pre-push audit: du -sh every untracked dir, head-sniff borderline .mds, verify branch + auth.
git push returning "Repository not found" against a non-jleechanorg org = wrong active gh account; use a token override pattern (see 3a).
git rebase origin/main conflict on a journal file = both sides added dated entries; merge chronologically, never --theirs or --ours.
git stash drop, not git stash pop, after a successful cherry-pick that re-applies stashed content.
Failure Mode 4: sources/ vs raw/ directory trap (frontmatter field confused with Layer 1 directory)
Symptom: A worker is told to ingest N source articles into the wiki. It writes N concept pages with correct frontmatter sources: ["mbti/ENFJ-per.html"] but the directory it points at is sources/articles/mbti/ENFJ-per.html — a path that does not exist in this wiki. The wiki's Layer 1 directory is raw/articles/ (or raw/papers/, raw/transcripts/, raw/assets/), not sources/articles/. The wiki is missing the actual source files (the worker either never fetched them, or fetched them into the wrong directory, or just summarized without saving). The next lint pass's source-drift check (item ⑧ in llm-wiki) becomes a no-op for those sources.
Why this fires: The frontmatter field is sources: (plural noun) and the URL-prefix convention is raw/. The worker has both sources: (in frontmatter) and the source path string (in the value) and conflates them, inventing sources/articles/ as a directory because "the value starts with sources/". This is a "the model improvises formatting" class of error — see llm-narration-format-clarifier for the broader pattern.
The rule: the sources: frontmatter field's value is always a path under raw/. Valid forms:
raw/articles/<descriptive-slug>-YYYY-MM-DD.html (raw HTML when the original is HTML and the LLM hasn't reformatted it)
raw/papers/<arxiv-id>-<slug>.pdf (arXiv PDFs)
raw/transcripts/<meeting-slug>-YYYY-MM-DD.md
raw/assets/<image>.png
Never sources/, never articles/ (without raw/ prefix), never any path that doesn't start with raw/.
Diagnostic (5 commands, ~3s):
# 1. List every concept page's sources: frontmatter valuefor f in$WIKI/concepts/*.md; do
grep -E '^sources:'"$f"done | sort -u
# 2. For every non-raw-prefixed source, flag it
grep -rEh '^sources:'$WIKI/ | grep -vE '"raw/' | head -20
# 3. For every flagged source, check whether the file exists# (this is what `llm-wiki` lint item ⑧ does — if it can't find the file, it can't drift-check)
Recovery recipe (sed fix across all flagged files):
# Verify the substitution works for one file before bulk-applying
grep -nE '^sources:.*"sources/'"$WIKI/concepts/mbti/ENFJ.md"# Bulk-fix: sources/articles/<TYPE>.html → raw/articles/<TYPE>.htmlfor f in $(grep -rlE '^sources:.*"sources/'$WIKI/); do
sed -i '''s|"sources/articles/|"raw/articles/|g'"$f"done# Verify no flagged paths remain
grep -rEh '^sources:'$WIKI/ | grep -vE '"raw/' | head -5
# Expect: zero output
Verified session (2026-07-28): 16-MBTI ingest. The wiki worker wrote 16 concept pages + 1 index page, each with sources: ["sources/articles/mbti/{TYPE}-per.html"]. None of those source files existed. Parent session (1) ran the Python-script curl-fetch into the correctraw/articles/mbti/ directory, then (2) bulk-sed-fixed all 17 files to use raw/articles/ paths. ~10 lines of sed + a 90-second Python ingest script. The fix would have been 2 lines per file if the worker had used the right path the first time.
Anti-pattern: re-running the worker with a bigger --max-turns budget. The worker will fix 1-2 files and re-time-out at the same place. The parent-session sed fix is faster (sub-second) and avoids losing the worker's well-formed concept pages.
Failure Mode 5: Concept pages without raw sources (skipped the raw/ ingest step)
Symptom: A worker is told to ingest N articles (e.g. "ingest 16 MBTI personality pages from personalitypage.com"). It writes 16 concept pages summarizing each article, but it skipped the curl-fetch step into raw/articles/. The sources: frontmatter on each concept page references a file that does not exist on disk. The wiki appears complete (17 markdown files for the MBTI topic) but is un-re-ingestable: when the source URL changes, the wiki can't detect drift because there's no source-of-truth hash to compare against.
Why this fires: The worker treats "summarize N articles into N concept pages" as the deliverable and optimizes for "concept pages exist" rather than "concept pages exist AND their raw sources exist". This is a "task boundary invisible" error — see claude-code-claudem for the related worker-context boundary case.
The rule: an ingest of N articles MUST produce N raw files in raw/articles/ (or raw/papers/ / raw/transcripts/) AND N corresponding concept pages AND index.md references AND a log.md entry. Skipping any one of these four steps is incomplete. The lint check that catches this is raw/ file-existence assertion during concept-page write: when writing a concept page that references a sources: path, assert the file exists at write-time.
The write-time assertion recipe (run BEFORE write_file on the concept page):
import os, re
WIKI = "$HOME/llm_wiki/wiki"
concept_path = "concepts/mbti/ENFJ.md"# Extract the sources: linewithopen(concept_path) as f:
sources_line = next((l for l in f if l.startswith("sources:")), "")
m = re.search(r'"([^"]+)"', sources_line)
if m:
raw_path = os.path.join(WIKI, m.group(1))
assert os.path.exists(raw_path), f"Missing raw source: {raw_path}"
Diagnostic for "did the worker skip the raw step?":
Recovery recipe (fetch the missing sources into raw/):
mkdir -p $WIKI/raw/articles/mbti
# Use Python with proper request handling (curl loop with 0.5s sleep is acceptable# but watch for Ezoic/Cloudflare bot-detection that returns 200 with empty body).# The personalitypage.com 16-page MBTI ingest took 14s with a 0.4s sleep.for t in ISTJ ISFJ INFJ INTJ ISTP ISFP INFP INTP ESTP ESFP ENFP ENTP ESTJ ESFJ ENFJ ENTJ; do
curl -fsS --max-time 30 -o $WIKI/raw/articles/mbti/${t}-per.html \
"https://personalitypage.com/html/${t}-per.html"sleep 0.5
done
Verified session (2026-07-28): 16-MBTI ingest. Worker wrote 16 concept pages but skipped the raw step. Parent session ran a 90-second Python ingest script (with size-check + sleep) into the correct directory. The wiki now has 16 HTML files (79-97 KB each, sha256-hashed) AND 16 concept pages AND index.md references AND log.md entry — all 4 deliverable components intact.
Anti-pattern: telling the worker "you also need to write the raw files" and re-dispatching. The worker will time out at the same place. Parent-session recovery is faster AND avoids losing the worker's well-formed concept pages.
