git-issue

created	"2025-12-16T00:00:00.000Z"
modified	"2026-04-21T00:00:00.000Z"
reviewed	"2026-04-21T00:00:00.000Z"
allowed-tools	Bash(git status *), Bash(git diff *), Bash(git log *), Bash(git add *), Bash(git commit *), Bash(git push *), Bash(git switch *), Bash(git pull *), Bash(git stash *), Bash(gh issue *), Bash(gh pr *), Bash(gh repo *), Bash(gh label *), Bash(gh api *), Bash(pre-commit *), Read, Edit, Write, Grep, Glob, TodoWrite, AskUserQuestion, Task, mcp__github__create_pull_request, mcp__github__issue_read, mcp__github__list_issues
description	Process GitHub issues end-to-end with TDD, interactive selection, conflict detection, and parallel work support. Use when the user asks to work on an issue, fix issue #N, pick issues to tackle, batch-process several issues in parallel, or spin up PRs from a prioritized issue list.
args	[issue-numbers...] [--auto] [--filter <label>] [--limit <n>] [--parallel]
argument-hint	[issue-numbers...] [--auto] [--filter <label>] [--limit <n>] [--parallel]
disable-model-invocation	true
name	git-issue

Context

• Repo: !git remote get-url origin
• Current branch: !git branch --show-current
• Working tree clean: !git status --porcelain=v2
• Open issues: !gh issue list --state open --json number,title,labels --limit 10
• Open PRs: !gh pr list --state open --json number,title
• Available labels: !gh label list --json name --limit 50

Parameters

Parse these parameters from the command:

Parameter	Description
<issue-numbers...>	One or more issue numbers to process
--auto	Claude selects and prioritizes issues
--filter <label>	Filter issues by label
--limit <n>	Maximum number of issues to process
--parallel	Process parallel groups simultaneously using Task agents
--labels <label1,label2>	Apply labels to created PRs (defaults to issue's labels)

Your Task

Process GitHub issues using a TDD workflow with the main-branch development pattern.

---

Mode Detection

No Arguments → Interactive Mode

Use AskUserQuestion to prompt:

questions:
  - header: "Issues"
    question: "How would you like to select issues to work on?"
    options:
      - label: "Let me choose specific issues"
        description: "Show issue list for manual selection"
      - label: "Claude decides priority"
        description: "Analyze issues and recommend which to tackle"
      - label: "Filter by label"
        description: "Select issues with a specific label"

For "Let me choose specific issues":

1. Fetch: gh issue list --state open --json number,title,labels,assignees
2. Present checkboxes with multiSelect: true

For "Claude decides priority":

• Analyze all open issues
• Score by clarity, scope, dependencies
• Present top recommendations

For "Filter by label":

• Present label selection from available labels
• Then show matching issues for selection

Single Issue (/git:issue 123)

Process directly with standard TDD workflow.

Multiple Issues (/git:issue 123 456 789)

1. Analyze all issues for conflicts and parallelization
2. Group by dependencies
3. Process sequentially or spawn parallel agents

Auto Mode (/git:issue --auto)

1. Fetch all open issues
2. Score and prioritize
3. Present recommendations for approval
4. Process approved issues

---

Issue Analysis Engine

Before processing multiple issues, analyze for:

Blocker Check (run first)

Before sequencing or scoring, ask GitHub which issues are blocked by other open work via the native dependencies API:

gh api repos/$OWNER/$REPO/issues/$N/dependencies/blocked_by \
  --jq '.[] | select(.state == "open") | .number'

If the list is non-empty:

1. Report the open blockers inline: #N is blocked by #X, #Y.
2. Use AskUserQuestion to offer: work on a blocker first, skip this issue, or proceed anyway (only appropriate if the blocker is stale or mis-linked).
3. Never silently work on a blocked issue — the "Blocked" badge exists so humans don't ship work out of order.

Also fetch dependencies/blocking to understand downstream impact — finishing an issue that blocks others may be higher leverage than finishing an independent issue of the same size.

Conflict Detection

Identify issues that cannot be worked on simultaneously:

Conflict Type	Detection Method
File overlap	Issues referencing same files/components
Logical conflicts	Opposing requirements (add vs remove)
Dependency chains	dependencies/blocked_by returns an open issue
Sub-issue ordering	Parent's sub_issues not yet complete

Confidence Scoring

Score each issue's implementability:

Factor	Weight	Criteria
Clear requirements	30%	Has acceptance criteria, specific details
Scope definition	25%	Bounded scope, identifiable files
No conflicts	20%	No overlapping work with other issues
Test strategy clear	15%	TDD approach is obvious
Labels/priority	10%	Has priority labels, milestone

Threshold: 70%

If confidence < 70%, prompt user:

questions:
  - header: "Low confidence"
    question: "Issue #N has unclear requirements. How should I proceed?"
    options:
      - label: "Attempt anyway"
        description: "Make best-effort attempt based on available info"
      - label: "Ask for clarification"
        description: "Request more details on the issue"
      - label: "Skip this issue"
        description: "Move to next issue in queue"

Parallel Work Detection

Identify issues that can be worked simultaneously:

Parallelizable when:

• Different files/components
• Neither issue appears in the other's dependencies/blocked_by
• Neither is a sub-issue of the other
• Independent test suites
• No logical conflicts

Output format:

Parallel Groups:
  Group 1: #123, #125 (both touch auth module - sequential)
  Group 2: #124 (standalone - can run in parallel)
  Group 3: #126, #127 (both touch UI - sequential)

Recommended: Run Groups 1, 2, 3 in parallel (3 agents)

---

Execution Workflow

Step 1: Prepare Working Directory

1. Ensure clean working directory (commit or stash if needed)
2. Switch to main and pull latest: git switch main && git pull

Step 2: For Each Issue (or Parallel Group)

Standard Flow (Sequential or Single Issue)

1. Fetch issue details: gh issue view $N --json title,body,state,assignees,labels
2. Capture issue labels for later PR creation
3. Identify requirements and acceptance criteria
4. Plan the implementation approach

TDD Workflow

1. RED phase: Write failing tests first

   • Create test file if needed
   • Write tests that define expected behavior
   • Run tests to verify they fail

2. GREEN phase: Implement fix

   • Write minimal code to make tests pass
   • Run tests to verify they pass

3. REFACTOR phase: Improve code quality

   • Clean up implementation
   • Ensure tests still pass

Commit and Push

1. Stage changes: git add -u and git add <new-files>
2. Run pre-commit if configured
3. Commit on main with message format:

<type>: <description>

<optional body explaining the change>

Fixes #N

1. Push to remote issue branch: git push origin main:fix/issue-$N

Create PR

Use mcp__github__create_pull_request with:

• head: fix/issue-$N
• base: main
• title: From issue title with fix: prefix
• body: Include Fixes #$N to auto-link

After PR creation, apply labels:

gh pr edit <pr-number> --add-label "<labels>"

Step 3: Parallel Execution (--parallel flag)

When --parallel is specified:

1. Group issues by dependencies (from analysis)
2. For each parallel group, spawn a Task agent:

Agent tool with subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "Process issue #N with TDD workflow..."

1. Wait for all agents to complete
2. Consolidate results

---

Commit Message Format

Issue reference at BOTTOM:

<type>: <description>

<optional body explaining the change>

Fixes #123

Multiple issues in single commit:

fix: resolve authentication and session handling

- Add token refresh logic
- Fix session timeout detection

Fixes #123
Fixes #125

---

Main-Branch Development Pattern

# All work stays on main
git switch main && git pull

# ... make changes, commit on main ...

git push origin main:fix/issue-$N    # Push to remote feature branch

# Create PR: head=fix/issue-$N, base=main
# Continue on main for next issue

---

Summary Report

After processing, report:

Metric	Details
Issues processed	List of issue numbers
PRs created	PR numbers with links
Conflicts detected	Issues that were sequentialized
Issues skipped	Low confidence or user choice

---

See Also

• git-branch-pr-workflow skill for workflow patterns
• test-tier-selection skill for test strategy
• git-cli-agentic skill for optimized git commands
• gh-cli-agentic skill for optimized GitHub CLI commands