statistical-analysis

name	statistical-analysis
description	Guided statistical analysis with test selection and reporting. Use when you need help choosing appropriate tests for your data, assumption checking, power analysis, and APA-formatted results. Best for academic research reporting, test selection guidance. For implementing specific models programmatically use statsmodels.
license	MIT license
tags	["scientific-skills","statistical-analysis","statsmodels","statistics"]
metadata	{"skill-author":"K-Dense Inc."}

Workflow Decision Tree

Use this decision tree to determine your analysis path:

START
│
├─ Need to SELECT a statistical test?
│  └─ YES → See "Test Selection Guide"
│  └─ NO → Continue
│
├─ Ready to check ASSUMPTIONS?
│  └─ YES → See "Assumption Checking"
│  └─ NO → Continue
│
├─ Ready to run ANALYSIS?
│  └─ YES → See "Running Statistical Tests"
│  └─ NO → Continue
│
└─ Need to REPORT results?
   └─ YES → See "Reporting Results"

---

Test Selection Guide

Quick Reference: Choosing the Right Test

Use references/test_selection_guide.md for comprehensive guidance. Quick reference:

Comparing Two Groups:

• Independent, continuous, normal → Independent t-test
• Independent, continuous, non-normal → Mann-Whitney U test
• Paired, continuous, normal → Paired t-test
• Paired, continuous, non-normal → Wilcoxon signed-rank test
• Binary outcome → Chi-square or Fisher's exact test

Comparing 3+ Groups:

• Independent, continuous, normal → One-way ANOVA
• Independent, continuous, non-normal → Kruskal-Wallis test
• Paired, continuous, normal → Repeated measures ANOVA
• Paired, continuous, non-normal → Friedman test

Relationships:

• Two continuous variables → Pearson (normal) or Spearman correlation (non-normal)
• Continuous outcome with predictor(s) → Linear regression
• Binary outcome with predictor(s) → Logistic regression

Bayesian Alternatives: All tests have Bayesian versions that provide:

• Direct probability statements about hypotheses
• Bayes Factors quantifying evidence
• Ability to support null hypothesis
• See references/bayesian_statistics.md

---

Assumption Checking

Systematic Assumption Verification

ALWAYS check assumptions before interpreting test results.

Use the provided scripts/assumption_checks.py module for automated checking:

from scripts.assumption_checks import comprehensive_assumption_check

# Comprehensive check with visualizations
results = comprehensive_assumption_check(
    data=df,
    value_col='score',
    group_col='group',  # Optional: for group comparisons
    alpha=0.05
)

This performs:

1. Outlier detection (IQR and z-score methods)
2. Normality testing (Shapiro-Wilk test + Q-Q plots)
3. Homogeneity of variance (Levene's test + box plots)
4. Interpretation and recommendations

Individual Assumption Checks

For targeted checks, use individual functions:

from scripts.assumption_checks import (
    check_normality,
    check_normality_per_group,
    check_homogeneity_of_variance,
    check_linearity,
    detect_outliers
)

# Example: Check normality with visualization
result = check_normality(
    data=df['score'],
    name='Test Score',
    alpha=0.05,
    plot=True
)
print(result['interpretation'])
print(result['recommendation'])

What to Do When Assumptions Are Violated

Normality violated:

• Mild violation + n > 30 per group → Proceed with parametric test (robust)
• Moderate violation → Use non-parametric alternative
• Severe violation → Transform data or use non-parametric test

Homogeneity of variance violated:

• For t-test → Use Welch's t-test
• For ANOVA → Use Welch's ANOVA or Brown-Forsythe ANOVA
• For regression → Use robust standard errors or weighted least squares

Linearity violated (regression):

• Add polynomial terms
• Transform variables
• Use non-linear models or GAM

See references/assumptions_and_diagnostics.md for comprehensive guidance.

---

Running Statistical Tests

Python Libraries

Primary libraries for statistical analysis:

• scipy.stats: Core statistical tests
• statsmodels: Advanced regression and diagnostics
• pingouin: User-friendly statistical testing with effect sizes
• pymc: Bayesian statistical modeling
• arviz: Bayesian visualization and diagnostics

Example Analyses

T-Test with Complete Reporting

import pingouin as pg
import numpy as np

# Run independent t-test
result = pg.ttest(group_a, group_b, correction='auto')

# Extract results
t_stat = result['T'].values[0]
df = result['dof'].values[0]
p_value = result['p-val'].values[0]
cohens_d = result['cohen-d'].values[0]
ci_lower = result['CI95%'].values[0][0]
ci_upper = result['CI95%'].values[0][1]

# Report
print(f"t({df:.0f}) = {t_stat:.2f}, p = {p_value:.3f}")
print(f"Cohen's d = {cohens_d:.2f}, 95% CI [{ci_lower:.2f}, {ci_upper:.2f}]")

ANOVA with Post-Hoc Tests

import pingouin as pg

# One-way ANOVA
aov = pg.anova(dv='score', between='group', data=df, detailed=True)
print(aov)

# If significant, conduct post-hoc tests
if aov['p-unc'].values[0] < 0.05:
    posthoc = pg.pairwise_tukey(dv='score', between='group', data=df)
    print(posthoc)

# Effect size
eta_squared = aov['np2'].values[0]  # Partial eta-squared
print(f"Partial η² = {eta_squared:.3f}")

Linear Regression with Diagnostics

import statsmodels.api as sm
from statsmodels.stats.outliers_influence import variance_inflation_factor

# Fit model
X = sm.add_constant(X_predictors)  # Add intercept
model = sm.OLS(y, X).fit()

# Summary
print(model.summary())

# Check multicollinearity (VIF)
vif_data = pd.DataFrame()
vif_data["Variable"] = X.columns
vif_data["VIF"] = [variance_inflation_factor(X.values, i) for i in range(X.shape[1])]
print(vif_data)

# Check assumptions
residuals = model.resid
fitted = model.fittedvalues

# Residual plots
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(12, 10))

# Residuals vs fitted
axes[0, 0].scatter(fitted, residuals, alpha=0.6)
axes[0, 0].axhline(y=0, color='r', linestyle='--')
axes[0, 0].set_xlabel('Fitted values')
axes[0, 0].set_ylabel('Residuals')
axes[0, 0].set_title('Residuals vs Fitted')

# Q-Q plot
from scipy import stats
stats.probplot(residuals, dist="norm", plot=axes[0, ])
axes[, ].set_title()


axes[, ].scatter(fitted, np.sqrt(np.(residuals / residuals.std())), alpha=)
axes[, ].set_xlabel()
axes[, ].set_ylabel()
axes[, ].set_title()


axes[, ].hist(residuals, bins=, edgecolor=, alpha=)
axes[, ].set_xlabel()
axes[, ].set_ylabel()
axes[, ].set_title()

plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()

Bayesian T-Test

import pymc as pm
import arviz as az
import numpy as np

with pm.Model() as model:
    # Priors
    mu1 = pm.Normal('mu_group1', mu=0, sigma=10)
    mu2 = pm.Normal('mu_group2', mu=0, sigma=10)
    sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=10)

    # Likelihood
    y1 = pm.Normal('y1', mu=mu1, sigma=sigma, observed=group_a)
    y2 = pm.Normal('y2', mu=mu2, sigma=sigma, observed=group_b)

    # Derived quantity
    diff = pm.Deterministic('difference', mu1 - mu2)

    # Sample
    trace = pm.sample(2000, tune=1000, return_inferencedata=True)

# Summarize
print(az.summary(trace, var_names=['difference']))

# Probability that group1 > group2
prob_greater = np.mean(trace.posterior['difference'].values > 0)
print(f"P(μ₁ > μ₂ | data) = {prob_greater:.3f}")

# Plot posterior
az.plot_posterior(trace, var_names=['difference'], ref_val=0)

---

Effect Sizes

Always Calculate Effect Sizes

Effect sizes quantify magnitude, while p-values only indicate existence of an effect.

See references/effect_sizes_and_power.md for comprehensive guidance.

Quick Reference: Common Effect Sizes

Test	Effect Size	Small	Medium	Large
T-test	Cohen's d	0.20	0.50	0.80
ANOVA	η²_p	0.01	0.06	0.14
Correlation	r	0.10	0.30	0.50
Regression	R²	0.02	0.13	0.26
Chi-square	Cramér's V	0.07	0.21	0.35

Important: Benchmarks are guidelines. Context matters!

Calculating Effect Sizes

Most effect sizes are automatically calculated by pingouin:

# T-test returns Cohen's d
result = pg.ttest(x, y)
d = result['cohen-d'].values[0]

# ANOVA returns partial eta-squared
aov = pg.anova(dv='score', between='group', data=df)
eta_p2 = aov['np2'].values[0]

# Correlation: r is already an effect size
corr = pg.corr(x, y)
r = corr['r'].values[0]

Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes

Always report CIs to show precision:

from pingouin import compute_effsize_from_t

# For t-test
d, ci = compute_effsize_from_t(
    t_statistic,
    nx=len(group1),
    ny=len(group2),
    eftype='cohen'
)
print(f"d = {d:.2f}, 95% CI [{ci[0]:.2f}, {ci[1]:.2f}]")

---

Power Analysis

A Priori Power Analysis (Study Planning)

Determine required sample size before data collection:

from statsmodels.stats.power import (
    tt_ind_solve_power,
    FTestAnovaPower
)

# T-test: What n is needed to detect d = 0.5?
n_required = tt_ind_solve_power(
    effect_size=0.5,
    alpha=0.05,
    power=0.80,
    ratio=1.0,
    alternative='two-sided'
)
print(f"Required n per group: {n_required:.0f}")

# ANOVA: What n is needed to detect f = 0.25?
anova_power = FTestAnovaPower()
n_per_group = anova_power.solve_power(
    effect_size=0.25,
    ngroups=3,
    alpha=0.05,
    power=0.80
)
print(f"Required n per group: {n_per_group:.0f}")

Sensitivity Analysis (Post-Study)

Determine what effect size you could detect:

# With n=50 per group, what effect could we detect?
detectable_d = tt_ind_solve_power(
    effect_size=None,  # Solve for this
    nobs1=50,
    alpha=0.05,
    power=0.80,
    ratio=1.0,
    alternative='two-sided'
)
print(f"Study could detect d ≥ {detectable_d:.2f}")

Note: Post-hoc power analysis (calculating power after study) is generally not recommended. Use sensitivity analysis instead.

See references/effect_sizes_and_power.md for detailed guidance.

---

Reporting Results

APA Style Statistical Reporting

Follow guidelines in references/reporting_standards.md.

Essential Reporting Elements

1. Descriptive statistics: M, SD, n for all groups/variables
2. Test statistics: Test name, statistic, df, exact p-value
3. Effect sizes: With confidence intervals
4. Assumption checks: Which tests were done, results, actions taken
5. All planned analyses: Including non-significant findings

Example Report Templates

Independent T-Test

Group A (n = 48, M = 75.2, SD = 8.5) scored significantly higher than
Group B (n = 52, M = 68.3, SD = 9.2), t(98) = 3.82, p < .001, d = 0.77,
95% CI [0.36, 1.18], two-tailed. Assumptions of normality (Shapiro-Wilk:
Group A W = 0.97, p = .18; Group B W = 0.96, p = .12) and homogeneity
of variance (Levene's F(1, 98) = 1.23, p = .27) were satisfied.

One-Way ANOVA

A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of treatment condition
on test scores, F(2, 147) = 8.45, p < .001, η²_p = .10. Post hoc
comparisons using Tukey's HSD indicated that Condition A (M = 78.2,
SD = 7.3) scored significantly higher than Condition B (M = 71.5,
SD = 8.1, p = .002, d = 0.87) and Condition C (M = 70.1, SD = 7.9,
p < .001, d = 1.07). Conditions B and C did not differ significantly
(p = .52, d = 0.18).

Multiple Regression

Multiple linear regression was conducted to predict exam scores from
study hours, prior GPA, and attendance. The overall model was significant,
F(3, 146) = 45.2, p < .001, R² = .48, adjusted R² = .47. Study hours
(B = 1.80, SE = 0.31, β = .35, t = 5.78, p < .001, 95% CI [1.18, 2.42])
and prior GPA (B = 8.52, SE = 1.95, β = .28, t = 4.37, p < .001,
95% CI [4.66, 12.38]) were significant predictors, while attendance was
not (B = 0.15, SE = 0.12, β = .08, t = 1.25, p = .21, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.39]).
Multicollinearity was not a concern (all VIF < 1.5).

Bayesian Analysis

A Bayesian independent samples t-test was conducted using weakly
informative priors (Normal(0, 1) for mean difference). The posterior
distribution indicated that Group A scored higher than Group B
(M_diff = 6.8, 95% credible interval [3.2, 10.4]). The Bayes Factor
BF₁₀ = 45.3 provided very strong evidence for a difference between
groups, with a 99.8% posterior probability that Group A's mean exceeded
Group B's mean. Convergence diagnostics were satisfactory (all R̂ < 1.01,
ESS > 1000).

---

Bayesian Statistics

When to Use Bayesian Methods

Consider Bayesian approaches when:

• You have prior information to incorporate
• You want direct probability statements about hypotheses
• Sample size is small or planning sequential data collection
• You need to quantify evidence for the null hypothesis
• The model is complex (hierarchical, missing data)

See references/bayesian_statistics.md for comprehensive guidance on:

• Bayes' theorem and interpretation
• Prior specification (informative, weakly informative, non-informative)
• Bayesian hypothesis testing with Bayes Factors
• Credible intervals vs. confidence intervals
• Bayesian t-tests, ANOVA, regression, and hierarchical models
• Model convergence checking and posterior predictive checks

Key Advantages

1. Intuitive interpretation: "Given the data, there is a 95% probability the parameter is in this interval"
2. Evidence for null: Can quantify support for no effect
3. Flexible: No p-hacking concerns; can analyze data as it arrives
4. Uncertainty quantification: Full posterior distribution

---

Resources

This skill includes comprehensive reference materials:

References Directory

• test_selection_guide.md: Decision tree for choosing appropriate statistical tests
• assumptions_and_diagnostics.md: Detailed guidance on checking and handling assumption violations
• effect_sizes_and_power.md: Calculating, interpreting, and reporting effect sizes; conducting power analyses
• bayesian_statistics.md: Complete guide to Bayesian analysis methods
• reporting_standards.md: APA-style reporting guidelines with examples

Scripts Directory

• assumption_checks.py: Automated assumption checking with visualizations
  • comprehensive_assumption_check(): Complete workflow
  • check_normality(): Normality testing with Q-Q plots
  • check_homogeneity_of_variance(): Levene's test with box plots
  • check_linearity(): Regression linearity checks
  • detect_outliers(): IQR and z-score outlier detection

---

Best Practices

1. Pre-register analyses when possible to distinguish confirmatory from exploratory
2. Always check assumptions before interpreting results
3. Report effect sizes with confidence intervals
4. Report all planned analyses including non-significant results
5. Distinguish statistical from practical significance
6. Visualize data before and after analysis
7. Check diagnostics for regression/ANOVA (residual plots, VIF, etc.)
8. Conduct sensitivity analyses to assess robustness
9. Share data and code for reproducibility
10. Be transparent about violations, transformations, and decisions

---

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

1. P-hacking: Don't test multiple ways until something is significant
2. HARKing: Don't present exploratory findings as confirmatory
3. Ignoring assumptions: Check them and report violations
4. Confusing significance with importance: p < .05 ≠ meaningful effect
5. Not reporting effect sizes: Essential for interpretation
6. Cherry-picking results: Report all planned analyses
7. Misinterpreting p-values: They're NOT probability that hypothesis is true
8. Multiple comparisons: Correct for family-wise error when appropriate
9. Ignoring missing data: Understand mechanism (MCAR, MAR, MNAR)
10. Overinterpreting non-significant results: Absence of evidence ≠ evidence of absence

---

Getting Started Checklist

When beginning a statistical analysis:

• Define research question and hypotheses
• Determine appropriate statistical test (use test_selection_guide.md)
• Conduct power analysis to determine sample size
• Load and inspect data
• Check for missing data and outliers
• Verify assumptions using assumption_checks.py
• Run primary analysis
• Calculate effect sizes with confidence intervals
• Conduct post-hoc tests if needed (with corrections)
• Create visualizations
• Write results following reporting_standards.md
• Conduct sensitivity analyses
• Share data and code

---

Support and Further Reading

For questions about:

• Test selection: See references/test_selection_guide.md
• Assumptions: See references/assumptions_and_diagnostics.md
• Effect sizes: See references/effect_sizes_and_power.md
• Bayesian methods: See references/bayesian_statistics.md
• Reporting: See references/reporting_standards.md

Key textbooks:

• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
• Kruschke, J. K. (2014). Doing Bayesian Data Analysis

Online resources:

• APA Style Guide: https://apastyle.apa.org/
• Statistical Consulting: Cross Validated (stats.stackexchange.com)