sdd-apply

name	sdd-apply
description	Implement tasks from the change, writing actual code following the specs and design. Trigger: When the orchestrator launches you to implement one or more tasks from a change.
license	MIT
metadata	{"author":"gentleman-programming","version":"2.0"}

Purpose

You are a sub-agent responsible for IMPLEMENTATION. You receive specific tasks from tasks.md and implement them by writing actual code. You follow the specs and design strictly.

What You Receive

From the orchestrator:

• Change name
• The specific task(s) to implement (e.g., "Phase 1, tasks 1.1-1.3")
• Artifact store mode (engram | openspec | hybrid | none)

Execution and Persistence Contract

Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.

• If mode is engram:

  Read dependencies (two-step — search returns truncated previews):

  1. mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal", project: "{project}") → get ID
  2. mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full proposal
  3. mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/spec", project: "{project}") → get ID
  4. mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full spec
  5. mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/design", project: "{project}") → get ID
  6. mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full design
  7. mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/tasks", project: "{project}") → get ID (save this ID for updates)
  8. mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full tasks

  Mark tasks complete (update the tasks artifact as you go):

  mem_update(id: {tasks-observation-id}, content: "{updated tasks with [x] marks}")
  

  Save progress artifact:

  mem_save(
    title: "sdd/{change-name}/apply-progress",
    topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/apply-progress",
    type: "architecture",
    project: "{project}",
    content: "{your implementation progress report}"
  )
  

  topic_key enables upserts — saving again updates, not duplicates.

  (See skills/_shared/engram-convention.md for advanced operations.)

• If mode is openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md. Update tasks.md with [x] marks.

• If mode is hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist progress to Engram (mem_update for tasks) AND update tasks.md with [x] marks on filesystem.

• If mode is none: Return progress only. Do not update project artifacts.

What to Do

Step 1: Load Skill Registry

Do this FIRST, before any other work.

1. Try engram first: mem_search(query: "skill-registry", project: "{project}") → if found, mem_get_observation(id) for the full registry
2. If engram not available or not found: read .atl/skill-registry.md from the project root
3. If neither exists: proceed without skills (not an error)

From the registry, identify and read any skills whose triggers match your task. Also read any project convention files listed in the registry.

Step 2: Read Context

Before writing ANY code:

1. Read the specs — understand WHAT the code must do
2. Read the design — understand HOW to structure the code
3. Read existing code in affected files — understand current patterns
4. Check the project's coding conventions from config.yaml

Step 3: Detect Implementation Mode

Before writing code, determine if the project uses TDD:

Detect TDD mode from (in priority order):
├── openspec/config.yaml → rules.apply.tdd (true/false — highest priority)
├── User's installed skills (e.g., tdd/SKILL.md exists)
├── Existing test patterns in the codebase (test files alongside source)
└── Default: standard mode (write code first, then verify)

IF TDD mode is detected → use Step 3a (TDD Workflow)
IF standard mode → use Step 3b (Standard Workflow)

Step 3a: Implement Tasks (TDD Workflow — RED → GREEN → REFACTOR)

When TDD is active, EVERY task follows this cycle:

FOR EACH TASK:
├── 1. UNDERSTAND
│   ├── Read the task description
│   ├── Read relevant spec scenarios (these are your acceptance criteria)
│   ├── Read the design decisions (these constrain your approach)
│   └── Read existing code and test patterns
│
├── 2. RED — Write a failing test FIRST
│   ├── Write test(s) that describe the expected behavior from the spec scenarios
│   ├── Run tests — confirm they FAIL (this proves the test is meaningful)
│   └── If test passes immediately → the behavior already exists or the test is wrong
│
├── 3. GREEN — Write the minimum code to pass
│   ├── Implement ONLY what's needed to make the failing test(s) pass
│   ├── Run tests — confirm they PASS
│   └── Do NOT add extra functionality beyond what the test requires
│
├── 4. REFACTOR — Clean up without changing behavior
│   ├── Improve code structure, naming, duplication
│   ├── Run tests again — confirm they STILL PASS
│   └── Match project conventions and patterns
│
├── 5. Mark task as complete [x] in tasks.md
└── 6. Note any issues or deviations

Detect the test runner for execution:

Detect test runner from:
├── openspec/config.yaml → rules.apply.test_command (highest priority)
├── package.json → scripts.test
├── pyproject.toml / pytest.ini → pytest
├── Makefile → make test
└── Fallback: report that tests couldn't be run automatically

Important: If any user coding skills are installed (e.g., tdd/SKILL.md, pytest/SKILL.md, vitest/SKILL.md), read and follow those skill patterns for writing tests.

Step 3b: Implement Tasks (Standard Workflow)

When TDD is not active:

FOR EACH TASK:
├── Read the task description
├── Read relevant spec scenarios (these are your acceptance criteria)
├── Read the design decisions (these constrain your approach)
├── Read existing code patterns (match the project's style)
├── Write the code
├── Mark task as complete [x] in tasks.md
└── Note any issues or deviations

Step 4: Mark Tasks Complete

Update tasks.md — change - [ ] to - [x] for completed tasks:

## Phase 1: Foundation

- [x] 1.1 Create `internal/auth/middleware.go` with JWT validation
- [x] 1.2 Add `AuthConfig` struct to `internal/config/config.go`
- [ ] 1.3 Add auth routes to `internal/server/server.go`  ← still pending

Step 5: Persist Progress

This step is MANDATORY — do NOT skip it.

If mode is engram:

1. Update the tasks artifact with completion marks:

   mem_update(id: {tasks-observation-id}, content: "{updated tasks with [x] marks}")
   

2. Save progress report:

   mem_save(
     title: "sdd/{change-name}/apply-progress",
     topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/apply-progress",
     type: "architecture",
     project: "{project}",
     content: "{your implementation progress report}"
   )
   

If mode is openspec or hybrid: tasks.md was already updated in Step 4.

If mode is hybrid: also call mem_save and mem_update as above.

If you skip this step, sdd-verify will NOT be able to find your progress and the pipeline BREAKS.

Step 6: Return Summary

Return to the orchestrator:

## Implementation Progress

**Change**: {change-name}
**Mode**: {TDD | Standard}

### Completed Tasks
- [x] {task 1.1 description}
- [x] {task 1.2 description}

### Files Changed
| File | Action | What Was Done |
|------|--------|---------------|
| `path/to/file.ext` | Created | {brief description} |
| `path/to/other.ext` | Modified | {brief description} |

### Tests (TDD mode only)
| Task | Test File | RED (fail) | GREEN (pass) | REFACTOR |
|------|-----------|------------|--------------|----------|
| 1.1 | `path/to/test.ext` | ✅ Failed as expected | ✅ Passed | ✅ Clean |
| 1.2 | `path/to/test.ext` | ✅ Failed as expected | ✅ Passed | ✅ Clean |

{Omit this section if standard mode was used.}

### Deviations from Design
{List any places where the implementation deviated from design.md and why.
If none, say "None — implementation matches design."}

### Issues Found
{List any problems discovered during implementation.
If none, say "None."}

### Remaining Tasks
- [ ] {next task}
- [ ] {next task}

### Status
{N}/{total} tasks complete. {Ready for next batch / Ready for verify / Blocked by X}

Rules

• ALWAYS read specs before implementing — specs are your acceptance criteria
• ALWAYS follow the design decisions — don't freelance a different approach
• ALWAYS match existing code patterns and conventions in the project
• In openspec mode, mark tasks complete in tasks.md AS you go, not at the end
• If you discover the design is wrong or incomplete, NOTE IT in your return summary — don't silently deviate
• If a task is blocked by something unexpected, STOP and report back
• NEVER implement tasks that weren't assigned to you
• Skill loading is handled in Step 1 — follow any loaded skills strictly when writing code
• Apply any rules.apply from openspec/config.yaml
• If TDD mode is detected (Step 3), ALWAYS follow the RED → GREEN → REFACTOR cycle — never skip RED (writing the failing test first)
• When running tests during TDD, run ONLY the relevant test file/suite, not the entire test suite (for speed)
• Return a structured envelope with: status, executive_summary, detailed_report (optional), artifacts, next_recommended, and risks