analysis-design

name	analysis-design
description	Systematic analysis and reasoning workflows. Use when performing audits, investigation, requirements analysis, risk analysis, scenario/edge-case enumeration, or design analysis that demands evidence-based, comprehensive coverage.
allowed-tools	["shell","apply_patch","read_file","write_file","update_plan"]
metadata	{"short-description":"Structured analysis workflow"}

Analysis Design

Read these reference files before proceeding:

• ~/.config/agent/core/behavior.md - Critical thinking and evidence requirements
• ~/.config/agent/core/methodology.md - 5-phase problem-solving framework
• ~/.config/agent/core/efficiency.md - Parallelization and throughput
• ~/.config/agent/core/task-management.md - TODO discipline
• ~/.config/agent/core/principles.md - Engineering principles
• ~/.config/agent/core/communication.md - Communication standards
• ~/.config/agent/domain/architecture/decomposition.md - Problem breakdown
• ~/.config/agent/domain/architecture/parallelization.md - Parallel execution
• ~/.config/agent/domain/testing/unit.md - Unit testing strategy
• ~/.config/agent/domain/testing/coverage.md - Coverage expectations

Instructions

Apply all guidance from the reference files listed above.

Use this workflow when the task requires rigorous, comprehensive analysis:

1. Scope & Objective

   • Restate the objective and success criteria explicitly.
   • Define in-scope and out-of-scope boundaries.
   • Capture constraints and assumptions up front.

2. Evidence Collection

   • Read relevant files and source-of-truth artifacts before reasoning.
   • Record evidence with precise references (paths, symbols, tests).
   • Mark each claim as Verified or Unverified based on evidence.

3. Scenario/Edge-Case Matrix

   • Enumerate all viable scenarios/contexts (including non-goals).
   • For each scenario, specify expected behavior and verification status.
   • Tag missing coverage explicitly as TODO with a test plan.

4. Risk & Unknowns

   • Identify unknowns and risks early; propose mitigations or decision points.
   • Separate solvable risks from unsolvable ones; document residual risk.

5. Recommendations & Plan

   • Provide prioritized recommendations (P0/P1/P2 or equivalent).
   • Map each recommendation to evidence and a verification step.
   • Update or produce a plan that reflects verified gaps and required policy decisions.

6. Verification Strategy

   • Define how correctness, safety, and completeness will be validated.
   • Prefer tests or reproducible checks; document gaps if verification is blocked.

Deliverables (as applicable):

• Evidence log (Verified vs Unverified)
• Scenario/edge-case matrix with TODOs
• Risk register with mitigation plan
• Updated implementation plan or decision record

Arguments

Target: ${ARGUMENTS}