com um clique
corvus-phase-1
Discovery phase - research and codebase exploration
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Menu
Discovery phase - research and codebase exploration
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Baseado na classificação ocupacional SOC
Planning (Phase 2), User Approval (Phase 3), and optional High Accuracy Plan Review (Phase 3.5)
Implementation loop - per-phase execution with quality gates
Final validation - comprehensive objective and subjective checks
Completion - success extraction and final summary
Follow-up triage - handling requests after feature completion
PR Review Phase R2 - Multi-pass review orchestration (architecture, correctness, security, conventions)
| name | corvus-phase-1 |
| description | Discovery phase - research and codebase exploration |
Goal: Gather all context needed for planning.
Launch these subagents IN PARALLEL using the Task tool:
Use when the task involves technologies, patterns, or best practices that benefit from external documentation.
**TASK**: Research best practices and documentation for [specific topic]
**EXPECTED OUTCOME**:
- Relevant documentation links
- Best practice recommendations
- Code examples from authoritative sources
- Effort estimate (S/M/L/XL)
**MUST DO**:
- Use web-research MCP tools (`web-research_multi_search`, `web-research_fetch_pages`) for web research
- Use complexity router: quick search for factual lookups, deep research for comparative/architectural questions
- Follow three-tier fallback: MCP tools → webfetch → curl
- Cite all sources with links
- Focus on [specific technology/pattern]
- Provide actionable recommendations
- Include effort estimates
**MUST NOT DO**:
- Make changes to any files
- Provide generic advice without evidence
- Skip the fallback chain if MCP tools fail
**REPORT BACK**:
- TL;DR (1-3 sentences)
- Key findings with source citations
- Recommended approach with rationale
- Potential risks or gotchas
Always required to understand the target codebase.
**TASK**: Analyze codebase to understand [relevant area/feature]
**EXPECTED OUTCOME**:
- List of files that need modification
- Existing patterns to follow
- Dependencies and constraints
- Entry points and data flow
- Project environment details (venv, package manager, build tools)
**MUST DO**:
- Use parallel search (3+ tools simultaneously)
- Provide file:line references for all findings
- Rate pattern quality where relevant
- Identify potential risks or blockers
- Detect project environment (venv, package manager, scripts)
**MUST NOT DO**:
- Make any file modifications
- Guess at implementations without evidence
**CONTEXT**:
- Project path: [path]
- Relevant directories: [list]
- Looking for: [specific patterns/files]
**REPORT BACK**:
- Files to modify (with line references)
- Files to create
- Patterns to follow (with examples)
- Dependencies to be aware of
- Potential risks or blockers
- Project environment (venv path, package manager, available scripts)
Exit Criteria: Have both research findings AND codebase analysis (or just codebase analysis if no external research needed).
Next Step: Immediately invoke task-planner (Phase 2). Do NOT summarize findings and ask user for approval - the approval comes AFTER task-planner creates the plan files.