work-with-design-systems

name	work-with-design-systems
description	Inspect, build, or extend Figma design systems — and optionally sync them to code. Two modes in one skill: inspect mode (read-only audits with WCAG checks, component scoring, detached instance detection, handoff docs) and build mode (creating components with variable bindings, slot-based composition, structured descriptions, validation, and optional export of tokens.css + AI rules to the user's codebase). Use when the user says 'audit my design system', 'check component quality', 'create design system', 'build DS in Figma', 'generate component library', 'add slots to my components', 'sync design tokens from code', 'find detached instances', 'check WCAG compliance', 'export tokens to code', 'generate CLAUDE.md for design system', or wants to push a design system from code to Figma or back. The skill auto-detects the mode from request, or asks if unclear. After inspect, ALWAYS pauses and waits for explicit user decision before any build action. Phase 6 (sync to code) is OFF by default — only triggers on explicit user request. Does NOT implement Figma designs as code — use figma-implement-design for that. Does NOT create individual screens — use figma-generate-design for that.
compatibility	Requires the figma-use skill to be installed. Requires Figma MCP server (remote) connected. Phase 6 (sync to code) requires file write access to the user's project — available in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and similar MCP clients. Not available when running in Claude.ai web/mobile chat (in that case Phase 6 outputs file contents inline for the user to copy).
metadata	{"mcp-server":"figma","version":"2.0.3"}

Work with design systems in Figma

Two modes in one skill: inspect (read-only quality audits with reports) and build (creating, fixing, extending components and tokens). Inspect produces structured reports. Build produces working Figma files. Build mode optionally extends to Phase 6 (sync to code) — generates tokens.css, an audit script, and AI rules file for the user's codebase. Phase 6 is off by default and only triggers on explicit user request.

Between inspect and build, the skill always pauses for the user to decide what to do with the report.

Always pass skillNames: "work-with-design-systems" when calling use_figma as part of this skill. This is a logging parameter — it does not affect execution.

Prerequisites

You MUST invoke the figma-use skill (Skill tool: skill: "figma-use") before every use_figma call. It contains critical Plugin API rules, gotchas, and script templates. Never call use_figma without it.

IMPORTANT: Before working with design systems in Figma, load the working-with-design-systems/wwds.md reference from the figma-use skill to understand key concepts and guidelines.

Critical rules

These apply to BOTH modes — inspect and build.

1. Work incrementally. One component (or one variant set) per use_figma call. Validate after each step. This is the single most important practice for avoiding bugs.
2. Never build on unvalidated work — match validation depth to change type.
   • Structural change (new variant, restructured auto-layout, new property, swapComponent): get_metadata + get_screenshot before next step. Visual properties may have shifted invisibly.
   • Binding / description / codeSyntax / scope / rename change: verify INSIDE the same script via node.boundVariables / node.description / variable.codeSyntax / variable.scopes reads, return as part of the result. No external get_screenshot needed — Figma is deterministic on these.
   • End of batch: one get_screenshot of the parent CS for visual sanity. Why: get_screenshot is the heaviest call and Figma MCP has a ~15 calls/min rate limit. Matching depth to risk frees that budget for the structural changes that actually need visual verification, and stops you hitting the rate limit on a binding pass that doesn't need it.
3. Bind visual properties to variables when a scale value exists. Fills, strokes, padding, itemSpacing, corner radius. For component-specific dimensions that don't match any scale value (e.g., 3px internal padding on a toggle track, 1px divider offset), hardcoded values are acceptable — document these exceptions in the component description.
4. lineHeight variables must store pixel values, not percentages. Figma variables are unitless. When bound to lineHeight, the value is interpreted as pixels. If your DS defines line heights as percentages (e.g., 150%), convert before storing: fontSize × (percentage / 100). Text styles can store {unit: "PERCENT", value: 150} — variables cannot.
5. Set codeSyntax.WEB on every variable. Without it, agents using get_design_context get raw Figma variable names instead of CSS token names. Set during creation, not as a separate pass.
6. Set explicit variable scopes. Never leave ALL_SCOPES. Background colors get FRAME_FILL + SHAPE_FILL. Text colors get TEXT_FILL. Spacing gets GAP + WIDTH_HEIGHT. Radius gets CORNER_RADIUS. Font size gets FONT_SIZE.
7. TEXT properties with the same name merge across variants. If two variants both define addComponentProperty("Label", "TEXT", ...), they become ONE shared property on the component set with one default value. For different defaults per variant: use different property names, leave text as direct content with instance text overrides, or accept the shared default.
8. TEXT component properties on every customizable text node. Without them, label overrides ("Label" → "Submit") revert on component update. Every customizable text node needs componentPropertyReferences = { characters: key }.
9. Use slots for compound components. Compound components (Card, Modal, Dialog, ListItem, ReviewCard) that contain variable inner content MUST use named slots instead of detach patterns or text-only props. Without slots, agents and users detach the component to edit inner content, which breaks maintenance and the agent's ability to reason about composition. Slots are available in Figma as of March 2026. See references/build/slots-guide.md.
10. Every public component MUST have a structured description. Figma MCP reads component descriptions and passes them to agents as context. Missing descriptions force the agent to guess purpose, behavior, and composition. Use the template in references/build/component-description-template.md. Use plain-text formatting (UPPERCASE section headers, no markdown bold or ## — get_design_context escapes them) — see template's "MCP delivery format" section. Private base components (prefixed with . or _) may use a one-line note.
11. Never detach a component. If you need to vary inner content, use: variant, boolean property, instance swap, or named slot. Detaching breaks the design-to-code bridge — the detached frame becomes structurally invisible to agents and to inspect mode.

---

Mode selection

The skill operates in one of two modes. The first thing to do in any session is determine the mode.

Inspect mode triggers when the user says:

• "audit my design system" / "check component quality" / "review my DS"
• "find detached instances" / "check WCAG" / "score my components"
• "generate handoff docs" / "export component specs"
• "is this design system ready" / "what's broken in my file"
• Any request that asks for a report or evaluation without explicit "build" or "fix"

Build mode triggers when the user says:

• "create design system" / "build DS in Figma" / "generate component library"
• "set up tokens" / "add components" / "sync from code"
• "fix ALL_SCOPES" / "add codeSyntax" / "rebuild Variables"
• "add slots to my components" / "write descriptions"
• "export tokens.css" / "generate CLAUDE.md" / "sync to code" (these enter build mode and proceed directly to Phase 6 if rest of system is in good shape)
• Any request that asks for changes to the file or codebase

Ambiguous requests like "I have a Figma file with some issues — help me with my design system" — ASK the user explicitly:

Should I run a quality audit first (read-only report with scores and issues), or go straight to building/fixing? If you want both, I'll do inspect first, show you the report, then wait for your decision before changing anything.

Default behavior when explicitly mixed ("audit and fix"): start with inspect mode, produce report, pause, wait for user direction.

---

Inspect mode

Read-only. Never modifies the file. Produces structured reports.

Read references/inspect/overview.md before starting. It documents which modules to run for which user requests, the execution order, and the readiness scoring formula.

Inspect workflow

1. Scope. Ask the user: full file or specific components? Which audit modules? Default is all six. Export format — markdown (default), JSON, both, or AI prompt.
2. Inventory. Run scripts/inspect/inventory.js to list all component sets with variant counts and page locations. Present as a table for user confirmation.
3. Run modules for each component set in this order:
   • Module 1 — Token compliance (scripts/inspect/audit-tokens.js) — outputs errors and warnings separately
   • Module 2 — Interactive states (scripts/inspect/audit-states.js)
   • Module 3 — Accessibility (scripts/inspect/audit-accessibility.js)
   • Module 4 — Detached instances (scripts/inspect/audit-detached.js) — runs once, file-wide
   • Module 5 — Naming quality (scripts/inspect/audit-naming.js)
   • Module 6 — Component descriptions (no script — uses Claude reasoning, read references/inspect/component-descriptions.md)
4. Compile report using templates from references/inspect/report-templates.md. Calculate weighted readiness score per component using the formula in references/inspect/readiness-scoring.md (errors weighted 1.0, warnings weighted 0.3).
5. Export report to /mnt/user-data/outputs/audit-report.md (and .json if requested).
6. STOP. Present report summary. Wait for user decision.

Inspect → build handoff

After inspect, the skill MUST pause and present:

Audit complete. Report saved to audit-report.md. Overall score: {score}/100.

Top issues:

1. {highest_impact_issue}
2. {second_highest_impact_issue}
3. {third_highest_impact_issue}

What would you like to do next?

• Fix issues — switch to build mode and address findings (I'll work through the priority list)
• Fix specific issues — tell me which to address (e.g., "fix only the ALL_SCOPES violations")
• Build new components — switch to build mode for new work, leaving issues for later
• Stop — keep the report for later, do nothing

DO NOT proceed to any build action without explicit user confirmation. This pause is the core guarantee of inspect mode.

---

Build mode

Read/write. Creates, modifies, validates.

Read references/build/component-spec.md and references/build/token-taxonomy.md before starting Phase 2 (foundations) or Phase 4 (components). Read references/build/slots-guide.md before building any compound component. Read references/build/auto-fix-guide.md before running fuzzy auto-fix on existing components. Read references/build/code-export.md before entering Phase 6.

Build workflow paths

Full build (no existing file): Phase 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → (optional 6)

Extend (variables/styles exist, need components): Phase 1c (health check) → fix foundation issues → Phase 3 (file structure, if needed) → Phase 4 → Phase 5 → (optional 6)

Fix foundations only: Phase 1c → fix ALL_SCOPES/codeSyntax/unbound → stop

Add slots to existing compound components: Phase 1c → identify detach-prone components → Phase 4c (slot decision) → Phase 4 (build or update) → Phase 5

Apply audit fixes — manual (entry from inspect mode): user reviews report → confirms scope → enter build mode → execute fixes per priority list → Phase 5 verification → (optional 6)

Apply audit fixes — fuzzy auto-fix (entry from inspect mode, user opts in): user reviews report → requests "auto-fix the token issues" → Phase 1c health check (foundations must be valid) → run scripts/build/fixHardcodedToTokens.js with issues from inspect → review applied/skipped report with user → handle skipped items manually → Phase 5 verification → (optional 6)

Code export only (Figma file is solid, just need files in repo): Phase 1c (verify foundations OK) → skip 2/3/4/5 → Phase 6

Phase 1: Discovery

1a. Determine the source

Ask the user:

• From scratch: What's the product? Brand colors, typography, spacing? Reference (Figma file, website, brand guidelines)?
• From codebase: Where are tokens defined? (tailwind.config.js, tokens.css, theme.ts, design-tokens JSON). Where are components? (src/components/ui/)

Supported inputs for from-scratch builds:

• .md file with brand guidelines
• .json design tokens (W3C DTCG format, Tokens Studio format)
• Screenshots or URLs as visual references
• Verbal description of brand, colors, typography

1b. If syncing from code — analyze the codebase

Scan for:

• Token files: CSS variables, Tailwind config, JSON token files, styled-components theme
• Component inventory: list all UI components, their props/variants, file paths
• Naming conventions: PascalCase vs kebab-case, variant naming patterns
• Framework: React, Vue, Svelte, Angular, or other
• Storybook stories (if present): Read *.stories.{ts,tsx,js,jsx,mdx} files. Each story = one Figma variant. Use story inventory to validate variant coverage in Phase 4. Missing variants on Figma side are as much a gap as missing stories on code side.

Read references/build/framework-mappings.md for framework-specific extraction patterns.

1c. If a Figma file already exists — quick health check

Fast sanity check to build a state ledger and decide how to proceed. NOT a full audit — for that, switch to inspect mode.

Run scripts/build/validate-design-system.js via use_figma. Then targeted checks:

• Variable scopes (flag ALL_SCOPES violations)
• codeSyntax coverage (list variables missing codeSyntax.WEB)
• Duplicate variables
• Bindings sample via get_metadata on a few components, check boundVariables coverage
• Generic layer names (if >20% of layers in components are auto-named like Frame 47, suggest Figma's AI rename in Actions panel as a first pass)
• Detach patterns in compound components (flag for Phase 4c slot decision)

Recommend a path:

• Build in place — file has solid variables, components need fixes
• New file, old as reference — no variables, naming chaos, start fresh
• Hybrid — foundations solid, components need rebuild
• Switch to inspect mode — if user wants comprehensive audit before deciding
• Code export only — if Figma is solid and user just wants Phase 6 outputs

If foundations are complete, skip Phase 2.

1d. Check for project overrides

Look for project-specific design system rules and load them as overrides on top of the skill's defaults. In priority order, check:

1. <projectRoot>/.claude/rules/design-system.md — Claude Code convention for DS rules
2. <projectRoot>/.claude/rules/component-build-rules.md — alternative name some projects use
3. <projectRoot>/CLAUDE.md — if it contains a "Components — Build Rules" or "Design System" section, load that section

If any of these exist, read them and treat the rules as extensions, not replacements, of this skill's Critical Rules and Phase requirements. Surface what you loaded to the user in one line: "Loaded project overrides from <path> — N additional rules will be applied."

Why: every team's DS has conventions the generic skill can't predict — component numbering schemes (C{section}.{number}), required registry fields (e.g. CMS element identifiers), brand-specific tokens (sharp buttons vs pill, scrim opacity values), description templates (a project-defined marker line first). Hardcoding these in the generic skill would over-specialize it; ignoring them forces the team to re-explain conventions every session. Loading them as overrides keeps the skill general while letting it act project-aware.

If no override file exists, proceed normally — do not block on absence.

1e. Confirm scope

Present summary:

• Token categories (colors, spacing, radius, typography, shadows)
• Number of modes (Light/Dark, brands)
• Component list (prioritized — core first)
• Naming convention
• Component numbering convention (C{section}.{number} {Name})
• CSS token naming for codeSyntax.WEB

Do not proceed until user confirms.

Phase 2: Foundations

Skip if Phase 1c confirmed all needed tokens exist and pass quality checks.

Read references/build/token-taxonomy.md before starting.

2a. Variable Collections

Recommended: 3-tier (Primitives → Semantic → Component). Best for multi-brand or new builds.

Alternative: flat domain-based (Colors, Spacing, Radius, Typography). Valid for single-brand or rebuilds where this structure exists.

Match what's in the file or codebase. The requirement is not depth — it's that every variable has explicit scopes and codeSyntax.WEB.

2b. Text Styles and Effect Styles

Create text styles with proper variable bindings (font-size, line-height, font-weight, letter-spacing all bound to variables). Apply lineHeight gotcha (Critical Rule #4).

Responsive / fluid type: model it with collection modes, not by hardcoding one size. Give the Typography collection a Desktop (default) and a Mobile mode; every font-size / line-height token carries a value per mode. A frame previews mobile via setExplicitVariableModeForCollection(typographyCollection, mobileModeId) while reusing the same text styles, and on code export each token's two mode values become the clamp() min (Mobile) and max (Desktop). Keep Desktop the default so styles preview at full size. (Line-height stays in pixels — Critical Rule #4.)

Create effect styles for shadows, blurs.

2c. Semantic layer completeness — cover every role, never skip status

When building the Semantic tier, verify it covers the full role surface, not just the obvious ones:

• background (canvas / surface / subtle / inverse) · text (primary / secondary / muted / inverse / on-brand) · border (default / strong / focus) · interactive (primary / secondary / disabled, + hover) · status (success / warning / error / info — each as solid / bg / text) · accent (optional)

Status is the most-missed group — treat it as mandatory for any app UI. Without it there is no token to show an error, a validation message, or a success toast.

If the source / brand palette has no status hues (especially no red for error): do NOT silently omit them and do NOT force a brand colour into a status role (a brown "error" reads as wrong and breaks the convention). Surface the gap to the user and propose a small functional status ramp (error | warning | success | info × {bg, solid, text}) tuned to harmonise with the palette, with every text-on-bg pair checked for WCAG AA (≥ 4.5:1). Status colour is functional infrastructure, not brand expression. See references/build/token-taxonomy.md.

Phase 3: File structure

Skip if documentation pages aren't required.

Standard pages: Cover, Getting Started, Foundations, one page per component group, Patterns (if applicable), Utilities.

Foundations page contains: rendered swatches for each color variable, type specimens for each text style, spacing scale visualization, effect previews.

Colour swatch card (recommended anatomy): group swatches by role (PRIMARY / SECONDARY / NEUTRALS / STATUS …) under uppercase section titles. Each card = a large swatch bound to the variable, then three text lines: human name (bold), the code token (--token-name, from codeSyntax.WEB), and HEX CODE : #RRGGBB. Add a 1px neutral border to swatches whose luminance is high (≈ > 0.82) so white / light-tint swatches stay visible on a white page. Type specimen: one row per text style; if the scale is responsive, show a Desktop column and a fixed-width Mobile column (mode-switched) side by side so the fluid behaviour is visible.

Component pages use fixed-width (996px) wrapper structure:

• Wrapper: 996px wide, AUTO height
• Specs container: FILL width, AUTO height, padL/R=96, itemSpacing=64

Patterns page (if patterns documented) follows the same wrapper structure. Read references/build/patterns-guide.md for pattern frame conventions.

Create a reusable Page Title component on Utilities page. Each component page uses an instance, not a manual frame.

Phase 4: Components

4a. Confirm component list

Suggest defaults (Button, Input, Select, Checkbox, Radio, Toggle, Card, Modal, Badge, Avatar, Toast). User confirms based on actual inventory. Add or remove freely.

Read references/build/component-spec.md for default specs.

4b. Build each component

One component per use_figma call. Validate after each.

Sequence per component:

1. Create base structure (component frame, variants, Auto Layout) via use_figma — patterns in figma-use skill's working-with-design-systems/wwds.md reference
2. Bind variables to fills, strokes, padding, item spacing, corner radius via use_figma — same reference
3. Add component properties (variants, booleans, instance swaps, TEXT properties)
4. Set spec wrapper frame (state labels as column headers, size labels as row labels)
5. Write structured description using references/build/component-description-template.md (Critical Rule #10)
6. Validate with get_metadata + get_screenshot

4c. Slot decision (for compound components)

Before building Card, Modal, Dialog, ListItem, ReviewCard, or any component that hosts variable inner content — read references/build/slots-guide.md and decide:

1. Variant — for fixed appearance changes (size, type, state)
2. Boolean property — for visibility toggles (has icon, show divider)
3. Instance swap — for single predictable element changes (icon, avatar)
4. Named slot — for arbitrary user-provided content (card body, modal content)

When in doubt for compound components, prefer slots. Document the decision in the component description.

4d. Patterns (optional)

If user wants composition patterns documented, read references/build/patterns-guide.md. Build pattern frames on the Patterns page using actual component instances arranged according to layout rules. Number patterns as P{section}.{number} {Name}.

Phase 5: QA

Run scripts/build/validate-design-system.js for full file audit:

• All collections present
• No ALL_SCOPES violations
• All variables have codeSyntax.WEB
• No hardcoded fills in components
• All components have Auto Layout
• Light/Dark modes tested
• All public components have descriptions
• All compound components have slot decision documented

Build a test page assembling several components together to verify composability.

After QA passes, present this prompt to the user:

Build complete. {N} components, {M} tokens, all validated.

Want to sync to code? I can generate up to four files in your project:

• tokens.css — design tokens with three-layer indirection (handles Light/Dark modes)
• AI rules file — design system rules for the AI agent in this repo (Claude Code / Cursor / Codex)
• scripts/token-audit.js — CI-ready audit script that catches hardcoded values
• specs/patterns/*.md — optional composition spec files (Hardik Pandya-style)

Reply with "yes, sync to code" to enter Phase 6, or "done" to stop here.

Do NOT enter Phase 6 unless user explicitly requests it.

Phase 6: Sync to code (optional, OFF by default)

Pre-condition: This phase requires file write access to the user's project root. Available in Claude Code, Cursor, and other MCP clients with file write tools. NOT available when skill runs in Claude.ai web/mobile chat — in that case, output the file contents inline for the user to copy manually.

When to enter Phase 6:

• User explicitly asks: "and generate tokens.css", "create CLAUDE.md for this DS", "set up the audit script", "sync to code"
• User accepts the Phase 5 closing prompt with "yes, sync to code"
• User starts session with explicit Phase 6 intent (e.g., "my Figma DS is solid, just generate tokens.css and CLAUDE.md") — skill runs Phase 1c health check then jumps directly to Phase 6
• DO NOT enter Phase 6 automatically. Retrofit scenarios (slot retrofit, partial fixes, foundation-only fixes) should never trigger Phase 6.

Read references/build/code-export.md before starting Phase 6.

6a. Format detection

Determine which AI agent client the project uses by checking the project root:

• .claude/ directory or CLAUDE.md file exists → Claude Code
• .cursor/ directory exists → Cursor
• AGENTS.md file exists → Codex
• None of the above → ask the user, or skip AI rules generation

If multiple are present, ask which the user wants. Skill can generate for multiple at once.

6b. Output path resolution

Important: never overwrite an existing top-level CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or full .cursor/rules. The skill writes to scoped locations:

• Claude Code → .claude/rules/design-system.md
• Cursor → .cursor/rules/design-system.mdc
• Codex → append a ## Design system section to AGENTS.md between explicit start/end markers (<!-- design-system-rules-start --> / <!-- design-system-rules-end -->) for safe future updates

If the scoped path already has a file from a previous Phase 6 run, ask user: overwrite, append, or skip.

6c. tokens.css strategy

Ask the user how Light/Dark modes should resolve in CSS:

• [data-theme="dark"] attribute on root — most flexible, requires JS to set
• @media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) — automatic, follows OS preference
• Both — explicit attribute wins, falls back to media query
• Single mode only — skip dark export

Multi-brand modes: use the same attribute pattern with brand-specific values ([data-brand="acme"]).

Read references/build/code-export.md for full structure with examples for each strategy.

6d. Generate files

For each file, use Claude's file write tools (NOT use_figma). Generate:

1. tokens.css — call scripts/build/exportTokensToCSS.js via use_figma to read all variables and return structured token data. Then format into the chosen CSS strategy (from 6c) and write to disk via file write tools.

2. AI rules file — read template from references/build/code-export.md "AI rules templates" section. Fill in component list (from current build), token reference list, audit script reference. Write to scoped path determined in 6b.

3. scripts/token-audit.js — read template from references/build/code-export.md "Audit script template" section. Fill in TOKENS object with token names and raw values from current build. Write to project's scripts directory (create if missing).

4. (Optional) specs/patterns/*.md — only if user explicitly asks ("also generate spec files for patterns"). One markdown file per pattern documented in Phase 4d. Use template from references/build/code-export.md.

If running in Claude.ai web (no file write tools), output each file's contents in fenced code blocks with clear "save as: {path}" headers.

6e. Verify

After writing files:

• If Node is available in the environment, run node scripts/token-audit.js and report results
• Note: if the project's existing CSS has hardcoded values, audit will flag them — that's expected on first run and tells the user where to apply tokens
• Confirm AI rules file is at correct scoped path (not overwriting top-level files)

Report file paths to user. Phase 6 complete.

---

Example (inline reference)

Inspect mode — quality report on someone else's file

User: "Audit this Figma file — I'm reviewing it for a client engagement."

Mode: Inspect.

1. Scope: full file, all six modules, markdown export
2. Inventory: 23 component sets across 5 pages
3. Run all modules per component
4. Compile report with scores
5. Export to audit-report.md
6. STOP. Present summary, wait for user decision.

For 8 more examples (full build, inspect → build paired flow, slot retrofit, narrow-scope inspect, end-to-end Phase 6, code-export-only, touch-up description pass) see references/examples.md. Load it when the request doesn't clearly match the inline example above.

For unusual situations (mode unclear, Phase 6 in Claude.ai web, missing fonts, token conflicts, rate limits, conflicting project overrides) see references/edge-cases.md. Load it when you hit one.

---

Error recovery

On any use_figma error:

1. Stop. Do not retry immediately.
2. Read the error message.
3. Call get_metadata to understand current file state.
4. Fix the root cause in the script.
5. Retry.

For full error recovery workflow, load figma-use skill.

On Phase 6 file write errors:

1. Stop. Report which file failed and why (permission, missing directory, conflict).
2. Do not partially write — leave already-written files in place but stop generation.
3. Present error to user with options (fix permissions, skip file, retry, abort Phase 6).