com um clique
codeprobe
codeprobe contém 10 skills coletadas de nishilbhave, com cobertura ocupacional por repositório e páginas de detalhe dentro do site.
Skills neste repositório
Analyzes code architecture and structure — layer violations, circular dependencies, god objects, anemic domain models, missing boundaries, directory structure issues, and configuration problems. Generates severity-scored findings with fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "architecture review", "structure check", "layer analysis", "god class".
Detects code smells and anti-patterns — long methods, large classes, feature envy, data clumps, primitive obsession, dead code, magic numbers, deep nesting, and more. Uses configurable thresholds from .codeprobe-config.json when available. Trigger phrases: "code smells", "smell check", "anti-patterns", "clean code review".
Scans code for error handling and resilience issues — swallowed exceptions, missing try/catch on external calls, unhandled promise rejections, missing transactions, validation gaps, retry/timeout omissions, and logging blind spots. Generates severity-scored findings with copy-pasteable fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "error handling check", "exception audit", "resilience check", "try/catch review", "error handling audit".
Detects framework-specific anti-patterns, convention violations, and idiom misuse across PHP/Laravel, React/Next.js, and Python/Django/FastAPI codebases. Loads framework-specific reference guides and checks against framework conventions. Generates severity-scored findings with copy-pasteable fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "framework review", "framework check", "laravel best practices", "react best practices", "framework audit", "framework-specific review".
Audits code for design pattern opportunities and anti-patterns — identifies places where a specific GoF or architectural pattern would solve an observable problem, and flags misapplied patterns that add complexity without benefit. Generates fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "design patterns", "pattern check", "pattern review", "refactoring patterns", "pattern analysis".
Scans code for performance and scalability issues — N+1 queries, missing indexes, unbounded queries, memory inefficiencies, caching gaps, algorithmic complexity, concurrency bugs, and frontend performance problems. Generates severity-scored findings with copy-pasteable fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "performance audit", "performance check", "N+1 detection", "query optimization", "slow code", "performance review".
Scans code for security vulnerabilities — injection flaws, authentication gaps, XSS vectors, mass assignment, CSRF, insecure deserialization, sensitive data exposure, broken access control, and misconfigurations. Generates severity-scored findings with copy-pasteable fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "security scan", "security audit", "vulnerability check", "find security issues".
Whole-codebase code quality audit system with 9 specialized sub-skills covering security, SOLID principles, architecture, error handling, performance, test quality, code smells, design patterns, and framework best practices. Produces a scored health dashboard (0-100 per category), severity-rated findings (P0-P3) with severity rationales, and copy-pasteable fix prompts; also does PR-style diff review vs a base branch. Strictly read-only — never modifies user code. Use when the user says "codeprobe", "audit", "full code review", "code health", "check my code", "security scan", "code smells", "SOLID check", or asks how healthy, risky, or maintainable a codebase is. (For reviewing just the working diff, the built-in /code-review may be more appropriate unless the user asks for codeprobe.)
Audits code for SOLID principle violations — Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, and Dependency Inversion. Identifies classes and methods that violate these principles and generates fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "SOLID check", "solid review", "SRP violation", "dependency inversion".
Audits code for test quality and coverage issues — missing tests, test smells, poor test structure, mock abuse, coverage gaps, and fragile test data. Identifies weaknesses in the test suite and generates fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "test quality", "test audit", "test review", "coverage check", "missing tests", "test quality audit".