idor

name	idor
description	Hunt Insecure Direct Object Reference (CWE-639) — missing authorization checks on object IDs. Covers horizontal vs vertical privilege escalation, UUID vs integer guessing, and GraphQL introspection-driven IDOR discovery.
metadata	{"subdomain":"web-exploitation","when_to_use":"idor insecure direct object reference cwe-639 authorization horizontal vertical privilege escalation uuid integer graphql introspection"}

IDOR Hunting Playbook

IDOR is the #1 source of bug bounty payouts because it's simple, ubiquitous, and scanners can't find it (authorization is business logic). Every endpoint that takes an object ID is a candidate.

1. Sources

• URL path segments: /api/users/123/invoices/456
• Query string: ?user_id=123
• JSON body fields: {"orderId": 123}
• Headers used as auth scope: X-Tenant-ID, X-Customer-Id
• JWT claims that downstream handlers trust: sub, tenant, role
• WebSocket subscription filters
• GraphQL arguments (user(id: 123))

2. Audit workflow

Step 1 — enumerate object-handling endpoints

# REST
grep -rE '@(Get|Post|Put|Delete|Patch)Mapping.*\{[a-zA-Z]+Id\}' /workspace/src   # Spring
grep -rE 'router\.(get|post|put|delete)\([^)]*:id' /workspace/src                # Express
grep -rE '@app\.route\([^)]*<[a-z]+:' /workspace/src                             # Flask
grep -rE 'resources?\s+:[a-z]+' /workspace/src                                   # Rails

# GraphQL
grep -rE 'type Query|type Mutation' /workspace/src
grep -rE '\w+\(id: ID' /workspace/src

Step 2 — for each endpoint, answer three questions

1. Does it check who the caller is? (auth middleware / decorator)
2. Does it check whether the object belongs to the caller? (ownership check / tenant filter in the query)
3. Does it check whether the caller's role permits the action? (RBAC / policy engine)

A "no" to question 2 = horizontal IDOR (read/write other users' data). A "no" to question 3 = vertical IDOR (regular user → admin action).

Step 3 — ownership-check grep patterns

# Django: should have .filter(user=request.user) on the queryset
grep -rE 'Model\.objects\.get\(pk=' /workspace/src | grep -v 'user=request\.user'

# Rails: should have current_user.posts.find(params[:id])
grep -rE 'Post\.find\(params\[:id\]\)' /workspace/src

# Spring: should have @PreAuthorize("#id == principal.id")
grep -rE 'findById\(id\)' /workspace/src | xargs -I{} grep -L '@PreAuthorize\|@PostAuthorize'

3. High-yield patterns

GraphQL IDOR via introspection

curl -X POST https://target.com/graphql \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"query":"{ __schema { types { name fields { name args { name type { name } } } } } }"}'

Any query field that takes an id arg and lacks a custom directive (@auth(requires: OWNER)) is a candidate. Mutations are even higher value — they often forget ownership checks.

JWT claim trust

If the handler pulls user_id from request.user.id but also accepts a user_id query param as override for "admin features", check whether the override path enforces the admin claim. Frequently broken.

Mass assignment via hidden fields

User.objects.create(**request.POST.dict())
# allows POST'ing is_staff=true

4. PoC workflow

Two-account diff:

1. Create account A, note sessionA cookie and objectA ID.
2. Create account B, note sessionB cookie and objectB ID.
3. curl -b sessionA /api/objects/<objectB> — should 403.
4. If it returns 200 with objectB data → confirmed IDOR.

For vertical escalation:

1. Normal user cookie sessionU.
2. Call admin endpoint: curl -b sessionU -X POST /api/admin/users/<victim>/role -d '{"role":"admin"}'.
3. Watch the response code + subsequent GET /api/users/<victim>.

5. UUID vs integer

Sequential integer IDs make IDOR trivial. UUIDv4 makes it harder but:

• UUIDs leak in logs, emails, public URLs, support tickets
• Many apps use UUIDv1 (time-based) which is partially predictable
• Enumeration through a listing endpoint still works
• Some APIs accept both UUID and numeric ID (dual primary key)

Always test UUID endpoints — the "it's a UUID so it's safe" assumption is one of the richest hunting grounds.

6. Success signals

• HTTP 200 where you expected 403/404
• Response body contains PII/data belonging to the other account
• Role field changed on victim account
• Subsequent admin action now permitted for low-priv session

Negative control: same request with your own account's ID. Should return 200 with identical shape. Anything that returns 404 for your own account but 200 for someone else's is a confirmation signal.

7. Default CVSS

Variant	Vector	Score
Horizontal read (other user PII)	AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N	6.5
Horizontal write (modify other user)	AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N	8.1
Vertical escalation to admin	AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H	9.9
Unauth → any user profile	AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N	7.5

8. Chain promotion

IDOR is a classic chain starter:

• IDOR → other user's password reset token → account takeover
• IDOR → admin role grant → every other admin-only vuln unlocked
• IDOR → internal API key → SSRF pivots

Weight 0.5 for authenticated IDOR, 0.3 for unauth.