| name | validating-cross-resource-consistency |
| description | Use when reviewing, creating, or modifying Kubernetes manifests that contain multiple resources. Use when Services, Deployments, ConfigMaps, Secrets, RBAC resources, Ingress, Routes, or NetworkPolicies appear together. Use when manifests reference other resources by name, label selector, or service account. Use when debugging why pods aren't receiving traffic, why containers fail to start, or why RBAC permissions aren't working.
|
Validating Cross-Resource Consistency
Overview
Core principle: Every cross-resource reference MUST resolve to an existing resource in the manifest set.
Linters validate individual resources but cannot detect broken links between them. You MUST verify ALL cross-references. Do NOT assume referenced resources "might exist elsewhere."
Validation Checklist
1. Selector Alignment
Service/NetworkPolicy/PDB selector must match Pod template labels (NOT Deployment metadata labels). Every label key AND value must match exactly. One mismatched character = zero Pods selected. See references/selector-patterns.md.
2. Name References
Every name reference must resolve to a resource in the manifest set. See references/k8s-resource-references.md for the complete field-to-resource mapping. Key references to check:
- ConfigMap/Secret names in
volumes, envFrom, env[].valueFrom
serviceAccountName -> ServiceAccount
imagePullSecrets -> Secret
- Ingress/Route backend -> Service
- RoleBinding
subjects -> ServiceAccount, roleRef -> Role
3. Port Consistency
- Service
targetPort must match a Pod containerPort
- Ingress/Route port must match a Service port
4. Namespace Consistency
All cross-referenced resources must share a namespace (except ClusterRole/ClusterRoleBinding).
5. RBAC Chain
For every serviceAccountName: ServiceAccount must exist, RoleBinding must bind it, Role must exist and grant needed permissions.
Report Format
CROSS-RESOURCE INCONSISTENCY:
Source: [kind/name] field [field path]
References: [target kind/name]
Problem: [mismatch, missing, wrong namespace]
Impact: [runtime failure]
Fix: [specific correction]
Red Flags - STOP and Investigate
- Selector matching zero Pods
- ConfigMap/Secret referenced but not defined
- ServiceAccount name not matching any ServiceAccount resource
- Ingress/Route pointing to non-existent Service
- Ports in Service not matching any container port
Common Rationalizations to Reject
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|
| "ConfigMap might exist in the cluster" | Untracked dependency. Flag it. |
| "RBAC is handled by cluster admins" | If manifest has serviceAccountName, RBAC chain must be complete. |
| "The selector probably works" | Verify character by character. web-frontend != frontend. |
| "External resources are managed separately" | Flag undocumented external dependencies. |
| "Each resource looks valid individually" | Individual validity is meaningless if cross-references break. |
| "It worked in dev" | Dev has pre-existing resources. Production won't. |
| "These are Kustomize bases, overlays add the rest" | Validate what's present. Flag missing resources with note about expected overlay. |
| "Helm templates will resolve this" | If reviewing rendered manifests, all references must resolve. If templates, note unresolvable refs. |
| "Other manifests exist in another directory" | Validate the set you have. Flag dependencies on external files explicitly. |
Reference Files
| File | Content |
|---|
references/k8s-resource-references.md | Complete cross-reference field mapping |
references/selector-patterns.md | Label selector patterns and common mismatches |