Menu
Explicitly materialize clarified requirements as one self-contained Change or one planning Objective.
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Baseado na classificação ocupacional SOC
Resolve genuine human decisions one question at a time after investigating facts.
Explicitly split an Objective into self-contained vertical Changes with native relationships.
Apply authorized code changes and report implementation-time technical activities honestly.
Inspect intent and quality once and report findings without modifying code or creating a repair loop.
Explicitly start and drive Slipway's interruptible soft autopilot one structured Action at a time.
| name | slipway-propose |
| description | Explicitly materialize clarified requirements as one self-contained Change or one planning Objective. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Use this capability only when the user explicitly asks to propose or publish a Slipway Issue. It may use the current conversation directly; it does not require a prior Clarify session and must not start implementation.
Choose the coherent level without fragmenting implementation steps:
A managed Change starts with the exact first non-empty line <!-- slipway-level: change/v2 -->, has a [Change] title, exactly one level:change label, exactly one of kind:feature|kind:bug|kind:refactor|kind:maintenance|kind:research|kind:docs, and one strict Issue-body manifest. Publish Outcome, Requirements, Acceptance examples, Constraints, and Non-goals as independently addressable chapter comments; each starts with its exact <!-- slipway-section:v1 key=KEY --> marker. The manifest's ordered entries bind each key/role/title to the comment node ID, database ID hint, and exact body digest. It must be self-contained; unreferenced discussion and a parent Objective are not runtime inheritance. ready-for-agent is optional navigation only.
A managed Objective starts with the exact first non-empty line <!-- slipway-level: objective/v1 -->, immediately followed by <!-- slipway-publication-operation: UUID --> and <!-- slipway-publication-item: UUID -->. It has an [Objective] title, exactly one level:objective label, exactly one of kind:feature|kind:bug|kind:refactor|kind:maintenance|kind:research|kind:docs, and the H2 sections Problem, Outcome, Requirements, Shared constraints, Non-goals, and Changes. It is never an executable Run source and does not receive ready-for-agent. The body marker remains authority: title or level-label drift is a warning and may be repaired only after confirmation; it never blocks a marker-valid Change Run.
For an existing Issue without a valid marker, do not rewrite it silently. Present exactly three choices: the user manually applies a normalized body; create a separately confirmed managed Change linked to it; or use a bounded summary in an explicit ad-hoc Run.
{{ template "source-bundle" . }}
Detect gh --version. For gh >= 2.94.0, use first-class parent, sub-issue, and dependency operations. With an older or missing gh, use the official GitHub REST API with the user's existing authentication, or report environment_unavailable; never invent local authority. Respect the platform limits of 100 sub-issues per parent and 50 blocking plus 50 blocked-by dependencies per Issue.
Trust redirects and transfers only while every hop remains on github.com. After a same-host redirect or transfer, refetch the repository node ID, Issue node ID, canonical URL, labels, parent, dependencies, and current revision; preserve the old URL as an alias and still compare the marker and source/Requirements revisions. Reject cross-host redirect trust.
{{ template "github-rest" . }}
An Objective is a single-stage publication. Show one preview containing the exact title, complete body, exact labels, every relation, one operation UUID, one item UUID, every pre-existing mutable target's provider identity and observed revision, and any missing-label creation with its exact name, color, and description. Its body layout is exactly:
<!-- slipway-level: objective/v1 -->
<!-- slipway-publication-operation: UUID -->
<!-- slipway-publication-item: UUID -->
## Problem
...
After one current external-write confirmation for that exact preview, refetch every mutable relation/label target and stop for a new preview if any approved revision drifted. Create every Issue or comment body with a private temporary body file or an equivalent cross-platform safe input path (for example, gh issue create --body-file FILE), never a POSIX heredoc. On timeout-after-success or another ambiguous response, reconcile the exact operation/item marker pair through a paginated non-search Issue API before any retry. Then perform a complete readback of identity, URL, exact title/full body and digest, both markers, labels, and relations, reporting each write as created, matched, failed, or ambiguous. Objective publication creates no chapter comments or manifest, asks for no second commit confirmation, and never starts Implement.
Before any write, show every complete chapter draft and one approved operation plan containing one operation UUID, one stable item UUID, target repository, exact comment bodies and digests, intended section keys/order/roles/titles, the deterministic rule that inserts provider-returned comment IDs into the final manifest, exact labels, parent/dependencies, every pre-existing mutable target's provider identity and observed revision, the expected parent Requirements revision, any missing-label creation with exact attributes, every relation mutation, and the exact receipt-only intermediate body. Obtain one current external-write confirmation for that complete operation.
Remote comment IDs do not exist before their Issue. A new Change may temporarily use a receipt-only body with no change/v2 level marker:
<!-- slipway-publication-operation: UUID -->
<!-- slipway-publication-item: UUID -->
The receipt-only Issue is a short-lived, non-authoritative reconciliation resource, not a Change source or a new lifecycle state, and not a second authorization boundary. For an amendment, leave the accepted body unchanged while creating approved replacement chapters. Create every body/comment through a private body file or equivalent cross-platform safe input, never a POSIX heredoc. Refetch and verify IDs, exact bodies, digests, and visibility, then deterministically build the final manifest from the approved keys/order/roles/titles, exact body digests, and returned IDs. The provider-assigned IDs are reconciliation facts and must not trigger a second confirmation. Every amendment manifest, including a content-identical replacement, sets parent_requirements_revision to the exact expected pinned revision; an initial manifest omits it.
Immediately before the final body PATCH or any mutation of a pre-existing label/relationship target, refetch every mutable target and reject approved revision drift. Remote drift, a missing receipt, ambiguity, or any material chapter/construction-rule change requires a fresh preview and current confirmation; otherwise finish the operation under the original approval and update the body last. The final body starts with the change/v2 marker and manifest fence and retains the same receipt markers after that fence:
<!-- slipway-level: change/v2 -->
```slipway-manifest
{...}
```
<!-- slipway-publication-operation: UUID -->
<!-- slipway-publication-item: UUID -->
Read back the complete graph. Unreferenced comments remain drafts and never become authority; never edit an accepted chapter in place or silently delete abandoned drafts.
On timeout-after-success, partial relation failure, duplicate marker matches, an ambiguous response, or indexing delay, enumerate with the paginated non-search Issue API and reconcile each operation/item marker. Report every Issue, label, and relationship as created, matched, failed, or ambiguous; never blindly retry, delete partial success, or claim exactly-once behavior. Zero matches require a fresh preview and confirmation before retry, one match may converge and read back, and multiple matches pause for the user.
Before showing or publishing a draft, warn that accepted Requirements and later journaled answers/command summaries may contain sensitive text. A public repository has no per-Issue private switch. Offer a private repository, enabled private vulnerability reporting only for an actual vulnerability, an existing security channel, or an ad-hoc Run. Redact recognized credential values while preserving truthful command identity. Do not collect tokens, unreferenced discussion, environment dumps, full transcripts, or hidden reasoning; if source validation is needed, transiently fetch only the manifest-referenced raw comment envelope for immediate CLI consumption and persist only accepted normalized materials/catalog.