update-deps

name	update-deps
description	Review and update third-party dependencies. Use this when asked to upgrade packages, survey new minor or major releases for useful features, assess whether a repository can adopt them, or validate whether a release looks suspicious before bumping it.

Update Dependencies

Review and update third-party dependencies. Use this when asked to upgrade packages, survey new minor or major releases for useful features, assess whether a repository can adopt them, or validate whether a release looks suspicious before bumping it.

Scope

Default to Bun packages, Cargo crates, and Docker base images. Expand to GitHub Actions when the request mentions them or the affected files live in .github/.

Stella repositories may already have automated controls such as:

• bunfig.toml minimum release age rules
• dependency review workflows for license and vulnerability checks
• SBOM or provenance workflows that regenerate dependency artifacts

Do not duplicate those checks manually unless the user asks for an audit or the automation looks stale or broken.

Arguments

$ARGUMENTS should describe the dependency scope, desired risk level, and whether to actually apply changes or only prepare a recommendation.

Helpful extras when available:

• package names, ecosystem, or files
• patch-only, minor, major, or mixed
• whether to optimize for new features, risk reduction, or vulnerability remediation

If the request is vague, default to:

1. all outdated dependencies in scope
2. coherent ecosystem-sized batches
3. one commit per validated batch

Instructions

1. Establish the version source of truth:

   • root package.json catalog, catalogs, and resolutions
   • workspace package.json files
   • bun.lock
   • Cargo.toml and Cargo.lock
   • .github/dependabot.yml for grouping expectations
   • .github/workflows/*.yml for GitHub Action pins
   • Dockerfiles and base image digests

2. Inventory outdated candidates:

   • run bun outdated --filter="*" for Bun workspace packages
   • run cargo outdated --root-deps-only for Cargo crates. If cargo-outdated is missing, prefer cargo binstall cargo-outdated when available (prebuilt binary, seconds) over cargo install cargo-outdated (compiles from source, several minutes). As a fallback, use cargo update --dry-run plus targeted cargo search / cargo info checks
   • inspect open dependency PRs if the request is about triage rather than local edits
   • include GitHub Actions only when the request covers them

3. Plan the full sweep, then batch it:

   • cover all outdated dependencies in the requested scope, not just the first safe batch
   • split the work into coherent ecosystem or library-family batches
   • follow existing Dependabot grouping where possible
   • avoid mixing high-risk majors with routine minors in the same commit
   • use one commit per validated batch so rollback stays easy

4. Classify upgrade risk before touching code:

   • patch: usually lowest risk
   • minor: check new features and silent behavior changes
   • major: assume migration work
   • 0.x minor: treat as potentially breaking

5. Read official upgrade sources:

   • changelog or release notes
   • migration guide
   • breaking changes
   • peer dependency, engine, runtime, and module-format changes

   Prefer official docs, releases, and package metadata over blog posts or third-party summaries.

6. Scan the codebase for adoption opportunities:

   • search current usage with rg
   • look for deprecated APIs, local workarounds, compatibility shims, TODOs, or comments the new release could remove
   • if a new version unlocks a better pattern, identify the concrete files that could adopt it now

7. Check suspicious-release signals before adopting a fresh version:

   • start with cheap metadata checks first
   • release age relative to repository quarantine rules
   • publisher, maintainer, repository, or homepage change
   • missing or unusual git tag or release notes
   • new preinstall, install, postinstall, or prepare scripts
   • new native binaries or bundled blobs

   Only escalate to tarball and file-tree inspection when the metadata looks odd, the package is high risk, or the user explicitly wants a supply-chain review. That deeper pass can cover:

   • sudden tarball size or file-tree jump
   • obfuscated files
   • package contents that differ materially from prior releases without explanation

   Good defaults:

   npm view <pkg>@<version> --json
   bun pm untrusted
   

   Use tarball inspection when the metadata looks odd or the release is high risk.

8. Apply the change at the real source of truth:

   • prefer root catalog, catalogs, or resolutions updates over per-workspace drift
   • update GitHub Actions by commit SHA, not floating tags
   • keep Docker images pinned by digest
   • for Cargo, prefer cargo update -p <crate> when the existing semver range already covers the new version; edit Cargo.toml only when bumping past the range
   • after each batch passes validation, commit that batch before moving to the next one

9. Review the lockfile delta:

   • use bun update, or edit manifests and run bun install
   • for Cargo, run cargo update and read the Cargo.lock diff the same way (unexpected transitive additions or replacements)
   • read the bun.lock diff for unexpected transitive additions, dependency replacement, or new script-bearing packages
   • if the new tree introduces untrusted packages with scripts, inspect them before trusting anything

10. Validate in layers:

    • run the smallest focused checks for the affected ecosystem first
    • then run repo checks relevant to the touched surfaces
    • for Bun package updates, default to bun run lint, bun run typecheck, and the relevant tests
    • for Cargo updates, run cargo check and cargo test when crates touch logic, not just deps
    • verify generated artifacts explicitly when the upgraded dependency affects them

11. Prefer removal and consolidation over passive growth:

    • if the upgrade makes a local helper, polyfill, or wrapper obsolete, remove it
    • if several packages now overlap, prefer the one already aligned with the codebase

12. Report back with:

    • the full batch plan
    • current and target versions
    • risk level
    • why the upgrade is worth taking now
    • concrete adoption opportunities found in the codebase
    • suspicious-release assessment
    • validation run
    • commit created for each completed batch
    • follow-up work for deferred or blocked majors