| name | launch-plan |
| description | Builds a full campaign or launch plan working backwards from a hard date — the big idea, the complete asset list with deadlines, the T-minus timeline, channel-by-channel choreography, and mid-launch decision triggers agreed before emotions are involved. Use when launching a product, offer, or campaign and the date is real. |
| argument-hint | [what is launching + the date + the number it must hit] |
Launch Plan — work back from the date, decide plan B now
Launches fail in predictable ways: assets finish late, every channel fires the same generic announcement, and mid-launch panic produces day-3 decisions that should have been made in week minus-3. This plan works backwards from the date, gives every channel its native role, and writes the plan-B triggers while nobody is panicking.
Inputs
- What is launching, the hard date, and the one number the launch must hit: $ARGUMENTS
- From
marketing-brief.md if present: top pains and desires (the big idea comes from them), the offer, the primary channel, the message pillars, and the language bank for copy.
Do this
- Fix the goal and the date. One number the launch must hit — revenue, signups, booked calls — and the date it must hit it by. Everything else flexes; these two do not.
- Choose the big idea: the one angle or story the whole campaign hangs on, drawn from the sharpest pain or desire in the brief. Test it in one sentence — would the ICP stop for it? A launch with three big ideas has none.
- Write the asset list — landing page, email sequence, posts, ads, creative, sales enablement — each tagged with the funnel stage it serves and the pillar it ladders to. Inside Claude Code, the launch-planner agent runs the deep version of this pass, and asset builds route to the creative skills (
/marketing:hook-factory for the openers, for instance).
- Build the T-minus timeline backwards from launch day: assets locked, warm-up and seeding phase (the audience should feel it coming), open day, mid-launch proof drop, close sequence. Every item gets a deadline and an owner, even if every owner is the same person.
- Choreograph the channels — what fires where, when, in what order, each in its native role rather than reposting the same announcement:
- Long-form and email carry the argument and do the closing.
- Social builds surround-sound presence and pulls people into the argument.
- The primary channel carries the weight; everything else exists to feed it.
- Pre-agree the mid-launch decisions: the day-2 or day-3 numbers that trigger plan B — swap the angle, drop more proof early, extend the close, or hold steady. Written now, not improvised on day 3.
- Name the two most likely failure points and the pre-built response to each.
Output
The one-page launch plan — goal and date, big idea, asset list with deadlines and owners, T-minus timeline, channel choreography grid, decision triggers, and the risk pass. After the launch, run /marketing:campaign-debrief to bank what it taught.
Rules
- The date is fixed; scope flexes. Cut assets before cutting the deadline — a smaller launch on time beats a fuller one late.
- One big idea. Every asset is a variation on it, or it gets cut.
- Plan the close hardest. Most launch revenue arrives at the end, and the close sequence is the worst place to improvise.
- Never launch cold. The warm-up phase is part of the launch, not overhead to trim.
- Real urgency only. If there is no genuine reason to act now, build one into the offer before launching, or launch without a countdown.