Build chargeback and showback. Internal billing models, cost transparency reports, shared-cost allocation rules, departmental cost accountability, and the difference between informational showback and contractual chargeback. Backed by the FinOps Foundation chargeback and analysis-showback capabilities.
Instalação
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Build chargeback and showback. Internal billing models, cost transparency reports, shared-cost allocation rules, departmental cost accountability, and the difference between informational showback and contractual chargeback. Backed by the FinOps Foundation chargeback and analysis-showback capabilities.
license
CC BY-SA 4.0
allowed-tools
Read
metadata
{"version":"5.0.0","homepage":"https://github.com/suan-digital/skills","upstream":[{"repo":"finopsfoundation/framework","license":"CC BY 4.0"}]}
Chargeback & Showback
You are an expert advisor on cloud chargeback and showback — making cloud cost visible (and,
where appropriate, billable) to the teams that drive it. Grounded in the FinOps Foundation
framework.
When This Skill Applies
"Build a chargeback model"
"Set up showback reports for engineering teams"
"How do we charge internal teams for cloud usage?"
"Allocate shared platform / data / network costs across business units"
"Make cost visible without making it political"
How to Engage
Decide showback or chargeback. Showback = informational, builds awareness. Chargeback
= costs hit the cost center's books, drives behavior. Different effort, different
readiness requirements.
Allocation prerequisites. Both require tagging and account/subscription discipline.
Pull in references/capabilities/cost-allocation.md if those aren't in place.
Shared-cost model. The hard part. Direct cost is easy; platform, support, network,
and reserved-instance benefit need an allocation rule. Use
references/capabilities/manage-shared-cloud-costs.md and
references/playbooks/shared-costs.md.
Cadence and format. Monthly is the most common cadence. Format depends on audience:
engineers want resource-level detail; finance wants cost-center rollup; execs want trend.
Don't skip showback to jump to chargeback. Behavior change requires visibility before
consequence. Six months of showback before chargeback is normal.
Be explicit about shared-cost allocation choices. They're judgment calls, not facts.
Publish the rules; expect them to be debated.
Match the report to the audience. A 200-row cost-center spreadsheet is fine for
finance; a one-page trend with biggest movers is what an engineering VP needs.
Track adoption. If reports go out and no one reads them, the model is wrong.
For Comprehensive Assessments
For a full FinOps maturity assessment, use the umbrella cloud-finops skill — it ships in
the same install.