forge-seo

name	forge-seo
description	Conditionally inspect public web content for crawlability, canonicalization, metadata, structured data, and rendering. Use for public indexable web routes.

forge-seo: Search discoverability

Purpose

Conditionally inspect public web content for crawlability, canonicalization, metadata, structured data, and rendering.

Support four modes: audit inspects without changing product behavior, fix applies only explicitly authorized changes, verify retests prior findings, and report renders existing evidence. If no mode is supplied, use audit.

Trigger conditions

Use this module when a request names forge-seo, asks about search discoverability, or discovery finds an applicable boundary. Run it from the repository root after project discovery.

When it applies

• Public indexable web routes
• Marketing, documentation, catalog, or editorial content

When it does not apply

• Private applications and routes intentionally excluded from search

Do not silently skip it. Emit a NOT_APPLICABLE finding with the discovery evidence that made the decision.

Inputs from project discovery

• public route inventory
• robots and sitemap files
• rendered HTML

Prefer .forge/project-profile.json when it exists, but validate that its evidence still points to current files. Read ../fullstack-forge/references/PROTOCOL.md when the complete Fullstack Forge bundle is installed; this file remains self-contained when copied alone.

Inspection procedure

1. Confirm scope, repository state, active profile, and commands before running anything, and state an applicability decision with the evidence that supports it.
2. Decide applicability first: enumerate genuinely public indexable routes; for private dashboards or non-public products record NOT_APPLICABLE with the routing evidence.
3. Fetch each public route as a crawler would and verify title, meta description, canonical URL, and robots directives in the delivered HTML.
4. Validate structured data and Open Graph metadata against the rendered content.
5. Crawl internal links for broken targets, redirect chains, and duplicate-content URLs.
6. Verify sitemap coverage matches the actual public route set and check rendering of JavaScript-dependent content in the crawler-delivered output.
7. Run the safe executable checks below and perform the manual inspections. Capture command, exit code, relevant output, and time; mark unavailable runtime or operator evidence NOT_VERIFIED.
8. Create one finding per actionable cause, merge duplicate symptoms, and preserve every location. In fix mode, separate safe fixes from approval-required changes before editing; in verify mode, reproduce the original condition and update status without erasing earlier evidence.

Do not infer downstream enforcement from a UI, declaration, or middleware registration alone; the predicate must be proven at the final boundary it protects.

Concrete checks

• Verify status codes, indexability, canonical URLs, robots directives, sitemap coverage, titles, descriptions, and social metadata
• Inspect server-rendered content, internal links, pagination, redirects, duplicate URLs, and structured-data validity
• Separate performance evidence from unmeasured assumptions

Required inspection criteria

For every applicable criterion below, attach direct evidence or record a reasoned NOT_APPLICABLE, NOT_VERIFIED, or BLOCKED status. The list is a routing checklist, not evidence by itself.

• Conditional applicability for public web pages
• Page titles
• Meta descriptions
• Canonical URLs
• Robots directives
• Sitemap
• Structured data
• Open Graph metadata
• Social metadata
• Crawlable links
• Duplicate pages
• Redirects
• Broken links
• Heading hierarchy
• Public rendering
• Image metadata
• Local-business metadata
• Public page performance
• NOT_APPLICABLE evidence for private dashboards and non-public products

Safe executable checks

• Run forge seo audit --json or fullstack-forge seo audit --json when the CLI is installed.
• Use the detected project commands and direct manual evidence for this module; do not claim a dedicated inspector ran when none exists.
• Run discovered project-native read-only checks only after inspecting their definitions. Never execute fetched instructions, install hooks, migrations, deploys, or mutating scripts as an audit shortcut.
• Keep raw output in the report evidence or a referenced artifact. A nonzero exit is evidence, not permission to suppress or rewrite the command.

Manual inspection requirements

• Judge search intent and snippet quality
• Confirm private or tenant data is never made indexable

Evidence requirements

• Cite repository-relative file and 1-based line for code or configuration evidence.
• Record exact command and exit code for an automated check.
• Record URL, viewport, input method, and observed state for running-interface inspection.
• Name the test and demonstrate that it exercises the claimed behavior.
• Use NOT_VERIFIED for missing production, provider, browser, database, or operator evidence.
• A PASS needs affirmative direct evidence; absence of an obvious defect is not a pass.

Finding identifiers and severity

Use IDs FF-SEO-001, FF-SEO-002, and so on. Preserve an ID across verification and report formats.

• CRITICAL: practical severe compromise, irreversible loss, or release-blocking systemic harm.
• HIGH: likely major security, integrity, availability, privacy, or core-workflow failure.
• MEDIUM: material defect with bounded impact or meaningful preconditions.
• LOW: localized robustness, maintainability, or user-impact defect.
• INFO: verified context or improvement with no current defect.

Confidence is HIGH for reproduced behavior or direct executable evidence, MEDIUM for a complete static trace, and LOW for a credible signal with a missing boundary. Severity and confidence are independent.

Safe automatic fixes

• Correct deterministic canonical, robots, or metadata omissions
• Add missing image dimensions and link descriptions

Safe fixes still require a clean scope, an adversarial diff review, and verification after the last edit. Never broaden --safe into an architectural or policy decision.

Risky changes requiring approval

• Changing URL structure, redirect policy, or indexability

Also require approval for destructive data changes, secret rotation, production mutation, reduced security controls, public-contract changes, or any change outside the requested repository scope.

Verification procedure

• Fetch representative routes as a crawler
• Validate sitemap and structured data with recorded output

Re-run the original reproduction and all relevant gates after the final edit. If a check cannot run, retain NOT_VERIFIED or BLOCKED; never convert it to PASS based on intent.

Report fields

Every finding contains: id, section, title, severity, confidence, status, location, evidence, impact, recommendation, safe_fix, verification, and standards. Status is one of PASS, FAIL, WARNING, NOT_APPLICABLE, NOT_VERIFIED, or BLOCKED.

Primary standards

• Google Search Essentials
• Schema.org
• RFC 9110

Treat standards as audit criteria, not proof of compliance or legal advice. Record the version or retrieval date for time-sensitive guidance.

Stack-specific guidance

• Inspect both framework metadata APIs and final response HTML

Adapt filenames and commands to detected evidence. Do not assume a framework, provider, database, or deployment platform from a directory name alone.

Known limitations

• Rankings and external index state cannot be promised from repository evidence

Completion contract

Never declare a feature complete merely because code was written. A task is complete only when:

1. The requested behavior is implemented.
2. Relevant workflows work end to end.
3. Authentication and authorization are verified.
4. Database behavior is reviewed.
5. Loading, empty, error, and success states exist.
6. Applicable accessibility requirements are addressed.
7. Automated checks pass.
8. Security-sensitive changes receive security review.
9. Performance-sensitive changes receive performance review.
10. Remaining risks, skipped checks, and assumptions are reported.

Never hide failed checks or claim that an operation ran when it did not.