| name | IAM Security Reviewer |
| slug | security-iam-reviewer |
| description | Review identity and access management using NIST SP 800-63B guidelines with MFA enforcement, password policy, and least privilege validation. |
| capabilities | ["Multi-factor authentication (MFA) enforcement review","Password policy compliance (NIST SP 800-63B)","Least privilege principle verification","Service account key rotation validation","Privileged Access Management (PAM) assessment"] |
| inputs | [{"identity_provider":"System or IAM service identifier (string, required)"},{"iam_scope":"authentication | authorization | accounts | all (string, default: all)"},{"authenticator_level":"AAL1 | AAL2 | AAL3 (string, optional for NIST compliance)"}] |
| outputs | [{"findings":"JSON array of IAM security findings with NIST 800-63B references"},{"nist_aal_compliance":"Authenticator Assurance Level compliance (if requested)"},{"remediation_policies":"IAM policy JSON or configuration snippets"}] |
| keywords | ["iam","identity","authentication","authorization","mfa","password-policy","least-privilege","pam","nist-800-63b"] |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| owner | cognitive-toolworks |
| license | MIT |
| security | Public; no secrets or PII; safe for open repositories |
| links | ["https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-63b/final","https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-53/rev-5/final"] |
Purpose & When-To-Use
Trigger conditions:
- IAM security audit before production deployment
- NIST SP 800-63B compliance requirement
- Post-incident identity and access review
- Privileged access management (PAM) assessment
- Third-party IAM security questionnaire
Not for:
- IAM system implementation (provides assessment only)
- Real-time access monitoring (use SIEM/access analytics tools)
- Cloud-specific IAM (use security-cloud-analyzer for AWS/Azure/GCP IAM)
- Application-level authentication (use security-appsec-validator)
Pre-Checks
Time normalization:
- Compute
NOW_ET using NIST/time.gov semantics (America/New_York, ISO-8601): 2025-10-26T01:33:55-04:00
- Use
NOW_ET for all citation access dates
Input validation:
identity_provider must be non-empty string
iam_scope must be one of: [authentication, authorization, accounts, all]
authenticator_level must be one of: [AAL1, AAL2, AAL3] or omitted
Source freshness:
Procedure
Step 1: Critical IAM Controls Check
Authentication:
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA) enabled for privileged accounts
- Password policy compliance per NIST SP 800-63B (accessed 2025-10-26T01:33:55-04:00):
- Minimum 8 characters (12+ for privileged accounts)
- No complexity requirements (NIST deprecates forced character mixing)
- Password breach database checking
- No periodic password rotation (only change on compromise)
- Session timeout configured (15-30 minutes for privileged access)
- Secure session cookies (HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite)
Authorization:
- Least privilege principle applied (no overpermissive roles)
- Role-based access control (RBAC) or attribute-based access control (ABAC)
- Separation of duties for critical operations
- Just-in-time (JIT) access provisioning for privileged operations
Account Management:
- Service account key rotation (90-day max age)
- Inactive account deactivation (30-60 days of inactivity)
- Privileged account monitoring and logging
- No shared accounts for individual users
Step 2: NIST Authenticator Assurance Level (AAL) Compliance
If authenticator_level specified, validate:
- AAL1: Single-factor authentication acceptable
- AAL2: MFA required (something you know + something you have)
- AAL3: Hardware-based authenticator required (FIDO2, smart card)
Token budgets:
- T1: ≤2k tokens (critical IAM controls)
- T2: ≤6k tokens (full IAM audit with NIST AAL compliance)
- T3: Not applicable for this skill (use security-auditor agent for comprehensive assessments)
Decision Rules
Ambiguity thresholds:
- If IAM configuration unavailable → request policy documents or admin access
- If password policy unclear → request authentication system documentation
Abort conditions:
- No identity provider specified → cannot proceed
- No IAM policies or user data accessible → limited to documentation review
Severity classification:
- Critical: No MFA on admin accounts, shared credentials (CVSS 9.0-10.0)
- High: Overpermissive policies, no key rotation (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
- Medium: Password policy gaps, missing session timeout (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
- Low: Best practice deviations (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
Output Contract
Required fields:
{
"identity_provider": "string",
"iam_scope": "authentication|authorization|accounts|all",
"authenticator_level": "AAL1|AAL2|AAL3 or null",
"timestamp": "ISO-8601 with timezone",
"findings": [
{
"id": "unique identifier",
"category": "authentication|authorization|account-management",
"severity": "critical|high|medium|low",
"cvss_score": 0.0,
"title": "brief description",
"description": "detailed finding",
"nist_reference": "SP 800-63B section X.Y or SP 800-53 AC-2",
"affected_accounts": ["account names or roles"],
"remediation": "specific fix steps",
"remediation_policy": "IAM policy JSON or config snippet"
}
],
"nist_aal_compliance": {
"target_level": "AAL1|AAL2|AAL3",
"current_level": "AAL1|AAL2|AAL3",
"compliant": true,
"gaps": ["list of gaps if not compliant"]
},
"summary": {
"total_findings": 0,
"critical_count": 0,
"high_count": 0,
"overall_risk": "critical|high|medium|low"
}
}
Examples
Example: MFA Enforcement Check
identity_provider: "corporate-idp"
iam_scope: "authentication"
authenticator_level: "AAL2"
{
"identity_provider": "corporate-idp",
"findings": [
{
"id": "IAM-001",
"category": "authentication",
"severity": "critical",
"cvss_score": 9.1,
"title": "MFA not enforced for admin role",
"nist_reference": "SP 800-63B Section 4.2 (AAL2)",
"remediation": "Enable MFA requirement for all admin accounts"
}
],
"nist_aal_compliance": {
"target_level": "AAL2",
"current_level": "AAL1",
"compliant": false,
"gaps": ["MFA not enforced"]
},
"summary": {"critical_count": 1, "overall_risk": "critical"}
}
Quality Gates
Token budgets:
- T1 ≤2k tokens (critical IAM controls)
- T2 ≤6k tokens (full IAM audit with NIST AAL compliance)
Safety:
- No credentials or tokens in examples
- No actual account names in public findings
Auditability:
- Findings cite NIST SP 800-63B or SP 800-53 controls
- Password policy recommendations align with current NIST guidance
Determinism:
- Same IAM state + inputs = consistent findings
Resources
NIST Standards:
IAM Best Practices:
Privileged Access: