research-g-7-review

name	research[G.7]-review
description	ResearchPilot Research Assistant [Phase G.7]: Full-paper review
version	2.0.0
license	LICENSE

Phase G.7: Full-Paper Review

user_requirements.md priority: All user constraints in docs/user_requirements.md take precedence over any default instruction in this skill. Always read it before generating output.

Overview

Paper Writing Stage Chain

Skill	Responsibility
/research[G.0]-plan	Update idea_report → plan structure/figures → select format
/research[G.1]-method	Write / revise Method
/research[G.2]-experiments	Write / revise Experiments
/research[G.3]-abstract	Write / revise Abstract
/research[G.4]-introduction	Write / revise Introduction
/research[G.5]-related	Write / revise Related Works
/research[G.6]-conclusion	Write / revise Conclusion + References
/research[G.7]-review	Full-paper review (five dimensions + claim-evidence)

---

Command

/research[G.7]-review

An optional natural-language instruction may follow the command. The AI will treat it as an additional constraint or supplement for this invocation.

Prerequisite: Any or all sections written

---

Before Writing: Required Steps

1. Read the full manuscript (avoid disconnection from already-written sections)
2. Read all existing references (References section or .bib file)
3. Read the === Paper Architecture === comment block at the top of the manuscript
4. Read docs/idea_report.md and docs/dev_log.md (find answers to writing questions here first)
5. Read example analysis if docs/manuscripts/examples/style-notes.md exists
6. Scan all annotations in the manuscript, list pending ones
7. Confirm writing plan with user before writing anything

See references/common-writing-constraints.md for full details.

---

Full-Paper Review Section-Specific Requirements

Five Dimensions (Master-cai paper-review.md):

1. Contribution: every claimed contribution supported by experiments?
2. Writing clarity: one message per paragraph? topic sentence covers the paragraph? consistent terminology?
3. Experimental strength: main/ablation/additional experiments cover all RQs? no missing strong baselines?
4. Evaluation completeness: fair comparisons? metric selection justified?
5. Method design soundness: every design choice motivated? ablation-verified?

Claim-evidence alignment (required): Output table for every major claim in Abstract and Introduction:

| Claim | Evidence | Status |
|-------|----------|--------|
| ... | ... | supported / needs evidence / missing |

Unsupported claims must be addressed — cannot be skipped.

Reverse outlining: extract each paragraph's topic sentence; check if they form a coherent story.

---

Version Management

Back up before writing:

cp paper.md paper_{mm-dd_hh-mm}.md   # or .tex

Append modification record to file header after writing (see references/common-writing-constraints.md).

---

Reference Maintenance

When a new citation is needed, append immediately:

md:

[N] {Author}. "{Title}." *{Journal/Conference}*, {Year}.
> Core contribution: {what this paper does, one sentence}
> Reason for citation: {where in the paper, why cited here}

LaTeX .bib:

% [Core contribution] {one-sentence contribution}
% [Reason for citation] {section}: {why cited here}
@article{key, ...}

---

On Phase Completion

Full-Paper Review section written/revised.

→ Paper writing complete.
→ Or use `/research[G.7]-review` for a full-paper review at any time.

---

Reference Files

• Review guide source: references/section-guide-source.md
• Writing flow source: references/writing-flow-source.md
• Template flexibility: references/template-flexibility.md