zoto-help-evals

Estrelas0

Forks0

Atualizado30 de maio de 2026 às 13:18

Project-tailored help for the Eval System plugin. Loads plugins/zoto-eval-system/README.md as the source of truth, inspects current project state (.zoto/eval-system/config.yml, manifest.yml, .env*, evals/_runs/, package.json scripts), and composes an answer that is grounded in the chosen README section, tailored to the host repo's actual configuration and artefacts, and cited with `start:end:path` code references back to the README. Pre-collected `help_context` arrives from the /z-eval-help command (command-owned askQuestion). The skill itself never calls askQuestion — missing context is returned as `needs_user_input`.

Instalação

Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.

Fonte

zotoio

zotoio/zoto-agents

Abrir repositório GitHub Ver repositórios do creator

Download

Ocupações relacionadasSOC

Baseado na classificação ocupacional SOC

Desenvolvedores de softwareInformática e Matemática·SOC 15-1252

Explorador de arquivos

2 arquivos

SKILL.md

readonly

Mais deste repositório

mesmo repositório

zoto-cursor-top-monitor

zotoio/zoto-agents

Guided workflow for launching and interpreting the cursor-top TUI. Covers process discovery, hierarchy expansion, log tail interpretation, and recommended flags for different scenarios. Use when the user wants to monitor every Cursor agent on their machine in real time, or to capture a snapshot for a report.

2026-06-110

zoto-configure-evals

zotoio/zoto-agents

Writes .zoto/eval-system/config.yml from field values pre-collected by /z-eval-configure (command-owned askQuestion). Refuses bundled update.preserveUserAuthoredCases:false or update.writeMetaMarker:false (including nested payload mirrors) before any manifest read or config write. Validates against templates/schema/config.schema.json. Diffs the chosen config against the manifest snapshot (discovery_config.static.framework) to produce a cleanup_plan validated against templates/schema/cleanup-plan.schema.json, and stamps _meta.primitive_analysis.invalidate=true on every cached primitive analysis when the static framework changes. The unified LLM eval harness ships one JSON-first co-located eval per target, with no per-repo selector axis — only the static framework matters here. Never calls askQuestion — returns needs_user_input if validation cannot proceed without user clarification.

2026-06-010

zoto-create-evals

zotoio/zoto-agents

Scaffolds static pytest and LLM (@cursor/sdk) eval backends into a host repository, generates eval cases with _meta.generated markers for approved skills/commands/agents/hooks, merges eval scripts into package.json, and writes the persistent manifest plus append-only history. Expects the invoking command to pre-collect approved targets — does not call askQuestion.

2026-06-010

zoto-eval-tooling

zotoio/zoto-agents

Invocation reference for all eval-system CLI commands. Use this skill when you need to run eval scripts — never reference script paths directly; always invoke via the package.json aliases documented here.

2026-06-010

zoto-execute-evals

zotoio/zoto-agents

Executes eval runs via the host repo's package.json scripts (pnpm run eval, eval:full, eval:llm, eval:judge). Forwards --model to the LLM runner via both a CLI flag and the ZOTO_EVAL_MODEL environment variable. After each run, calls eval:update --check and appends the drift status to the run report as a warn-only line. Does not call askQuestion — credential gaps use needs_user_input for the command.

2026-06-010

zoto-judge-evals

zotoio/zoto-agents

Adversarial judge for eval runs. Identifies weak graders, under-covered assertions, verbosity spikes, and accuracy/confidence regressions. Produces an enriched llm.yml with soft-metric annotations. Does not call askQuestion — handoff to /z-eval-update is expressed as needs_user_input for the command to confirm via askQuestion and resume. Uses the configured judgeModel (default claude-opus-4-8[]).

2026-06-010

name

zoto-help-evals

description

Help Evals

Canonical help for the Eval System plugin. The README is the source of truth; this skill grounds every answer in it, and tailors the answer to the host project so users see their actual evalsDir, framework, model, manifest targets, and run history — not generic defaults.

Configuration

No repo-level config required. The skill uses:

plugins/zoto-eval-system/README.md (or the installed path at ~/.cursor/plugins/zoto-eval-system/README.md) as the documentation source of truth.
The host repo's eval-system state files for tailoring (read-only): .zoto/eval-system/config.yml, .zoto/eval-system/manifest.yml, .zoto/eval-system/manifest.history.yml, .env.example, .env, package.json (the eval* scripts), and the latest evals/_runs/<run-id>/ if any.

When to Use

/z-eval-help invoked (after the command resolved which section to answer for).
The routing rule rules/zoto-eval-system.mdc detects help-intent in the user's message and hands off here before the agent answers from inferred knowledge.

Workflow

Step 1: Load the README

Read the README from the plugin path. Parse ## section headers. The list of sections is the menu the command uses; the chosen section is the answer's anchor — every claim in the response must trace back to it (or to a clearly-cited adjacent section).

Step 2: Section selection (command-pre-collected)

The /z-eval-help command runs askQuestion before invoking this skill when:

No <topic> was given → numbered section picker.
Multiple headers match <topic> → disambiguation picker.
Follow-up navigation (related sections) → optional second prompt + resume.

The Task prompt (or skill input) MUST include help_context:

selected_section: exact ## header title or slug to anchor the answer on. Must match a README section verbatim — e.g. Strategy bridge, Configuration, LLM backend (@cursor/sdk).
follow_up: optional enum (related, quick_start, done) if the command already collected the next navigation step.
user_question: optional free-form follow-up the user typed instead of picking an option.

If selected_section is missing and cannot be inferred safely, return needs_user_input with candidate sections — never call askQuestion.

Step 3: Load project signals (mandatory before composing the answer)

Read whichever of these are relevant to the chosen section. Skip files that don't exist; never fabricate values. When a signal is unread, the answer must not assert anything about it.

Section anchor	Signals to read
Overview, Quick start	`.zoto/eval-system/config.yml` (presence), `.zoto/eval-system/manifest.yml` (presence), `package.json` (`scripts.eval*`)
Configuration	`.zoto/eval-system/config.yml` (full), `templates/schema/config.schema.json` for field reference
Static backend	`config.json` → `static.framework`, host repo's `evalsDir` contents
LLM backend (`@cursor/sdk`)	`config.json` → `llm.*`, `.env.example`, `.env` (presence only — never read secret values), `package.json` devDeps for `@cursor/sdk`, `dotenv`
Interaction branch (unified LLM eval harness)	`manifest.yml` → per-target `eval_files[]` (one co-located `<kind>/evals/<name>.json` per target); presence of `evals/llm/_shared/vitest-json-loader.ts` and `evals/llm/_shared/run-llm-suite.ts`; cached analyser payloads under `.zoto/eval-system/cache/analyser/` for `requiresInteraction`; latest `report.yml` per-case `backend:`
Advanced TS escape hatch (`runner` cases) and scenarios	README "Eval formats" / "Advanced TS escape hatch" / "Multi-primitive scenarios" sections; `evals/llm/_shared/runner-params.ts` contract; `evals/scenarios/` directory listing; presence of `evals/scenarios/_example-multi-primitive.test.ts`
Updating evals	`manifest.yml` → `discovery_config`, `targets[]`; `manifest.history.yml` (last entry)
Result schema	latest `evals/_runs/<run-id>/report.yml` and per-backend `static.yml` / `llm.yml` if any
Run logs	`evals/_runs/` directory listing; latest `<run-id>/logs/`
Comparing runs	last 2 entries under `evals/_runs/`
Judge & soft metrics	`config.json` → `judgeModel`, latest `llm.yml`
CI integration	`.github/workflows/*.yml` if present, host `package.json` scripts
Troubleshooting	whichever signals match the symptom in `user_question`

If a signal disagrees with the README (e.g. host uses vitest static framework but the README's pytest example is the only one), prefer the project signal for facts about the host repo and the README for facts about the plugin's contract, and call out the mismatch explicitly.

Step 4: Compose a tailored, cited answer

The answer paraphrases freely and is grounded in the README. Three rules are non-negotiable:

Anchor on the chosen section. Every claim about plugin behaviour must trace to lines in the README. Adjacent sections may be cited if they're directly relevant to the user's question.
Tailor with project signals. Replace generic placeholders with values read from the host repo. Examples:
- "your evalsDir is evals/" — only after reading config.json.
- "you currently have N targets in the manifest" — only after reading manifest.yml.
- "your latest run is <run-id>" — only after listing evals/_runs/. When a value cannot be read (file absent), say so and link to the command that creates it (e.g. "no manifest.yml yet — run /z-eval-create").
Cite every quoted block with the code-reference syntax, using line numbers from the README:
```
...the exact lines from README...
```
Inline references to other files (e.g. the user's config.json) use the same start:end:path syntax. Filenames in prose are wrapped in backticks. Never invent line numbers — re-read the file if unsure.

Answer skeleton

<one-paragraph orientation, in your own words, anchored on the chosen section>

<key points as a short list — paraphrased, each followed by an inline citation
  to the README lines that back the claim>

<project-tailored observations from Step 3, e.g.
  "Your config has `static.framework: vitest`, so the pytest section above
   doesn't apply — see the vitest backend stanza instead." >

<README quote block(s), each in the start:end:plugins/zoto-eval-system/README.md
  code-reference format, kept short and on-topic>

<next-step suggestion: which command to run, or which other section to read>

Step 5: Follow-up navigation

If follow_up is absent but the user clearly needs another section, return needs_user_input with section options so the command can askQuestion and resume. Do not chain to a second section silently.

Citation format — required

README quote: code reference with line numbers. Paths are relative to repo root (plugins/zoto-eval-system/README.md). Do not add a language tag.
```
## Quick start
...
```
Project file quote (e.g. user's config.json): same start:end:path syntax.
Inline reference in prose: backticked file path, e.g. plugins/zoto-eval-system/README.md — used when no quoted block is needed.

Anti-patterns (will fail the skill's evals):

Pasting the entire README section without paraphrase or project tailoring.
Asserting project-specific facts ("your evalsDir is evals") without reading the file first.
Paraphrasing the README without any citation back to it.
Inventing line numbers.

What NOT to Do

Do not answer from inferred knowledge. The README is the contract; project files are the host state.
Do not rewrite the README. Edits go through plugin authors committing directly.
Do not call askQuestion from this skill. Use needs_user_input so the command can prompt and resume.
Do not read or echo secret values from .env — only check whether the file exists.
Do not invent project values when a file is absent. Say "no manifest.yml yet" and point at the command that would create it.

Q&A quick reference

User question	Answer anchor
How do I write a TS eval?	Use a `runner` case in your co-located JSON eval (see README "Advanced TS escape hatch"), or add a multi-primitive scenario under `evals/scenarios/`.
Where is the `RunnerParams` contract defined?	`evals/llm/_shared/runner-params.ts` (TS source) and `plugins/zoto-eval-system/templates/schema/runner-params.schema.json` (JSON Schema mirror).