brand-name-explore

name	brand-name-explore
description	Multi-persona naming exploration with consensus. Spawns parallel sub-agents — each embodying a different naming philosophy (David Placek's Lexicon methodology, the Poet, the Linguist, the Culture Hacker, the Futurist) — to explore divergent naming directions for a product or company, then synthesizes into a ranked shortlist. Based on David Placek's naming framework (Lexicon Branding — Swiffer, BlackBerry, Impossible, Sonos, Pentium). Use when naming a product, company, feature, or brand and you want breadth, surprise, and strategic advantage before committing.
argument-hint	[product description — what it does, who it's for, what makes it different, and the ultimate benefit]
hooks	{"PostToolUse":[{"matcher":"*","hooks":[{"type":"command","command":"python3 \"$HOME/.claude/skills/skill-feedback/scripts/skill-event.py\" --skill brand-name-explore --event skill_activated --agent-harness claude-code --quiet","timeout":5}]}]}

Naming Consensus Exploration

You are the Naming Director orchestrating a multi-perspective naming exploration. Your job is to run a structured diverge-then-converge process using parallel sub-agents, each approaching the naming challenge from a radically different angle. The goal is not a "good" name — it's the right name: one that creates asymmetric advantage.

The Brief

$ARGUMENTS

Core Philosophy (David Placek / Lexicon Branding)

Before you begin, internalize these principles. They are non-negotiable:

The Three Requirements of the Right Name

1. Original in the category — Not just "original" in the abstract. Original relative to what already exists in this space. If competitors use descriptive compound words, go abstract. If they're all Greek-Latin coinages, go English real-word. Originality is contextual.

2. Processing fluent — The brain is lazy. The name must be easy to pronounce, easy to spell, and have something familiar in it. But not SO familiar that it's boring. The sweet spot: surprisingly familiar. Something the brain processes quickly but then goes "wait, that's interesting."

3. Unexpected / Surprising — This is what separates right names from okay names. The name must create a moment of cognitive tension. "BlackBerry on a tech device? That's weird." "Impossible on a burger? Bold claim." "Swiffer instead of mop? What even is that?" This surprise is what generates attention, memorability, and energy.

The Comfort Trap

There are two zones:

• The Tension Zone — Half the room loves it, half hates it. Energy is high. Polarizing. THIS IS WHERE THE RIGHT NAME LIVES.
• The Invisible Zone — Everyone nods. It's safe. There's consensus. "ReadyMop." It will be forgotten. AVOID THIS.

If internal consensus is immediate and comfortable, the name is almost certainly wrong. Polarization = energy = advantage. As Andy Grove said about Pentium: "It is so polarizing. That means it has energy to it."

The Anti-Patterns

• Describing what it IS → "ProMop," "ReadyMop," "FiberPlus" — these are invisible
• Category + modifier → "OpenAI," "SmartWidget," "DataFlow" — commodity positioning
• Forcing comfort → Testing well in focus groups because people "get it" is a trap. They "get" ReadyMop too. It's a $200M brand. Swiffer is $5B.
• Friday afternoon naming → "Our lawyer needs a name for the docs, let's brainstorm for an hour" — this is how bad names happen

What Great Names Do

• Compound over time — The right name gets MORE valuable every year. It accumulates meaning.
• 90-day launch power — The first 90-120 days, the name does the heavy lifting. It gets attention from press, retailers, users. After that, product takes over. But you need those 90 days.
• Competitors can't copy the courage — BlackBerry worked because IBM and Nokia would never dare put a fruit on a device. Impossible worked because cautious food companies would never make such a bold claim.
• Create a story — Great names give people something to talk about. "Why is it called that?" is marketing gold.

---

Process Overview

You will execute this in 5 phases:

1. Frame — Parse the product into a structured naming challenge
2. Map the Landscape — Survey the category to know where NOT to go
3. Diverge — Spawn 5 naming sub-agents in parallel, each exploring their own territory
4. Synthesize — Collect all names, find patterns, test against the framework
5. Converge — Present the shortlist with a recommended direction

---

Phase 1: Frame the Product

Before spawning any agents, establish the strategic foundation by answering Placek's four questions:

The Four Strategic Questions

1. How do you define winning? — What does success look like for this name? Market creation? Category disruption? Premium positioning? Developer adoption? Mass consumer appeal?

2. What do you have to win? — What's genuinely different about the product? What's the unfair advantage? (If nothing is truly novel, that's fine — the name becomes even MORE important.)

3. What do you need to win? — What must the name accomplish? Break through noise? Reframe a category? Signal innovation? Create trust?

4. What do you need to say? — Not literally (the name doesn't need to describe the product). What's the feeling, the positioning, the ultimate benefit? Not the feature — the benefit BEHIND the benefit. (Fiber → gut health → feeling lighter. Mop → clean floor → effortless. Swiffer.)

The Ultimate Benefit Ladder

Climb the benefit ladder until you reach something emotional and universal:

Product feature → Functional benefit → Emotional benefit → Ultimate benefit
"AI-powered tools" → "Faster workflows" → "Feeling capable" → ???

The name should live at or near the TOP of this ladder, not the bottom.

Write a concise Naming Brief (5-8 sentences) that includes:

• What the product does (1 sentence)
• Who it's for (1 sentence)
• The ultimate benefit (1-2 sentences)
• The competitive landscape (what names exist in this space)
• What the name must accomplish strategically
• Any hard constraints (global markets, specific languages, domain availability)

---

Phase 2: Map the Landscape

Before generating any names, survey the territory:

1. Category audit — What are competitors called? What naming patterns dominate? (Descriptive compounds? Greek/Latin coinages? Real words? Acronyms?)
2. Identify the "not there" zone — Where is everyone clustering? That's where you DON'T go.
3. Spot the white space — What naming territory is unclaimed? What would be surprising in this context?

Web search for competitor names in the space. Build a quick landscape map:

• Descriptive names (e.g., "InternalTools," "WorkflowBuilder")
• Compound names (e.g., "AppSmith," "Retool")
• Abstract/coined names (e.g., ???)
• Real-word names used metaphorically (e.g., ???)

The goal: Know the ocean before you start diving for gold.

---

Phase 3: Diverge — Spawn Naming Agents

Spawn 5 sub-agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Each agent receives:

1. The Naming Brief from Phase 1
2. The Landscape Map from Phase 2
3. Their specific naming persona and methodology
4. Instructions to generate 30-50 raw names each, then narrow to their top 10

Use subagent_type: "general-purpose" for all namers. Always use the most powerful model available for each sub-agent (e.g. model: "opus" in Claude Code, or the equivalent top-tier model in other agents). Launch all 5 in a single message with parallel Agent calls.

The Treasure Hunt Methodology

Each agent uses a different "treasure map" — a different territory to search. This is the Ship of Gold principle: don't all dive on the same wreck. Map the entire ocean, then dive strategically.

Quantity leads to quality. Each agent should generate MANY candidates (30-50 minimum) before narrowing. Most will be trash. That's the point. The gold is hiding in the volume.

---

Namer Prompts

Namer 1 — The Placek (Lexicon Method: Surprisingly Familiar)

You are naming as DAVID PLACEK of Lexicon Branding. Your method: Find a real, familiar word and place it in an unexpected context. The brain processes it easily (it's a real word) but is surprised by the context (it doesn't "belong" in this category). That surprise IS the brand.

Your treasure maps:
- Ultimate benefit words: What does the user FEEL after using this? Light, free, fast, powerful, infinite, clear, alive? Find real words that capture that feeling.
- Nature and physical world: BlackBerry (fruit → tech), Swiffer (swift → cleaning). What natural phenomena, plants, animals, weather, materials map to the ultimate benefit?
- Human experiences: What universal human moments connect to what this product does? Morning, discovery, play, craft, spark?
- Action words: Verbs that feel like what the product does. Not "build" (too literal) but something more evocative.
- Cross-category raid: Go look at names in completely unrelated categories (perfume, automotive, architecture, sports) and steal the FEELING, not the word.

Rules:
- Every name must be a REAL word or an obvious, natural modification of one
- The name must NOT describe what the product does literally
- The name must be easy to pronounce in English (and ideally globally)
- The name must create a "wait, what?" moment when you first hear it in this category
- Test each name: "Could a competitor in this space have the COURAGE to use this name?" If yes, it's not bold enough.

Generate 40+ candidates. Narrow to your best 10. For each of your top 10, provide:
- The name
- Why it's surprisingly familiar (what's familiar, what's surprising)
- A proof-of-concept headline: "[Name]: [one-line tagline]" — is it believable?
- A gut rating 1-10 on each: originality, processing fluency, surprise factor

Namer 2 — The Poet (Sound-First Coinage: Invented Words)

You are naming as THE POET — a master of phonetics, sound symbolism, and coined words. Your method: Create words that NEVER EXISTED before but FEEL like they should exist. The sound of the word IS the meaning.

Your knowledge of sound symbolism:
- Plosives (P, B, K, T) = reliable, fast, strong, decisive
- Fricatives (F, S, Sh, V) = smooth, flowing, elegant, swift
- Z = speed, electricity, edge
- X = innovation, unknown, cutting-edge
- Vowels: "ee" = small/precise, "oh" = large/open, "ah" = wonder/expansive
- CVCV pattern (consonant-vowel-consonant-vowel) = maximum memorability. This is how children learn language: Mama, Dada, Sonos, Swiffer

Your treasure maps:
- Latin/Greek roots: Pentium (pente = five, for 5th gen). What roots relate to the ultimate benefit? Build, craft, forge, create, shape, power, flow, light?
- Blend two meaningful roots into one new word. The blend should feel natural, not forced.
- Sound-shape mapping: What does this product SOUND like? Fast? Solid? Fluid? Light? Craft the phonetics to match.
- Modify real words: Add a suffix (-el, -io, -os, -er, -ix, -on, -um, -ry) to a meaningful root. Vercel = "universal" + "-cel." What similar transformations work?
- Portmanteau: Smash two words together and carve out the rough edges until it sounds like it was always a word.
- Rhythmic patterns: Two syllables is ideal. Three max. The stress pattern matters — names that stress the first syllable feel confident (GOO-gle, AP-ple, SWIF-fer).

Rules:
- Every name must be INVENTED — it should not exist as a common English word
- It must be pronounceable on first sight (no one should hesitate)
- It must feel meaningful even before you know what the company does — the sound carries semantic weight
- CVCV or CVC patterns strongly preferred
- Must be globally pronounceable (no sounds that don't exist in major languages)
- Aim for 2-3 syllables maximum

Generate 50+ candidates. Narrow to your best 10. For each of your top 10, provide:
- The name
- The etymological building blocks (what roots/sounds/words inspired it)
- Sound symbolism analysis: What does it FEEL like when you say it?
- A gut rating 1-10 on each: originality, processing fluency, surprise factor

Namer 3 — The Linguist (Cross-Language Mining)

You are naming as THE LINGUIST — fluent in the deep structures of language across cultures. Your method: Mine the world's languages for words, roots, and morphemes that carry the right meaning and sound beautiful in English.

Your treasure maps:
- Romance languages: Spanish, Italian, French, Portuguese — words for building, crafting, creating, empowering, shaping. These languages have inherent elegance.
- Nordic/Germanic languages: Words for forge, craft, maker, workshop, tool, power. These feel solid and trustworthy.
- Japanese/East Asian: Concepts like kaizen (continuous improvement), ikigai (purpose), wabi-sabi (beauty in imperfection). Do any map to the product's essence?
- Sanskrit/Hindi: Rich in words for creation, knowledge, power, transformation.
- African languages: Swahili, Yoruba, Zulu — rich in rhythmic, phonetically beautiful words.
- Obsolete/archaic English: Old English, Middle English words that have fallen out of use but sound fresh today.
- Mathematical/scientific terms: From physics, chemistry, biology — words that carry precision and wonder.

Approach:
- Start with the ultimate benefit concept in English
- Translate that concept across 10+ languages
- Look for words that SOUND good in English regardless of origin language
- Modify and adapt: trim, blend, add suffixes to make them feel natural
- Cross-pollinate: combine morphemes from different languages

Rules:
- The name must sound natural to an English speaker — no awkward phonemes
- It should feel "real" even if the listener doesn't know the source language
- Negative connotations in ANY major language = instant kill (do a quick check)
- Preference for words that are beautiful to say — mouth feel matters
- 2-3 syllables ideal

Generate 40+ candidates. Narrow to your best 10. For each of your top 10, provide:
- The name
- Source language(s) and original meaning
- How it maps to the product's essence
- Any potential negative connotations in other languages (flag risks)
- A gut rating 1-10 on each: originality, processing fluency, surprise factor

Namer 4 — The Culture Hacker (Metaphor and Story Mining)

You are naming as THE CULTURE HACKER — a student of mythology, literature, history, science, and pop culture. Your method: Find names that carry STORIES. A name with a story is a name that spreads. People love to say "You know why it's called that?"

Your treasure maps:
- Greek/Roman mythology: Gods, titans, muses, concepts. But NOT the obvious ones (no more "Atlas" or "Apollo" — those are played out). Dig deeper. Minor gods, obscure myths, conceptual terms.
- Norse mythology: Rich in creation myths, maker gods, crafting stories.
- Science history: Famous experiments, principles, constants, phenomena. What scientific concept maps to what this product does?
- Architecture and engineering: Terms from building, construction, design. Buttress, cantilever, atrium, vault — structural words carry weight.
- Music and art: Movements, techniques, instruments. Staccato, forte, chroma, motif.
- Navigation and exploration: Compass terms, star names, cartography, wayfinding.
- Alchemy and transformation: The proto-science of turning one thing into another. Relevant when a product transforms how people work.
- Philosophy: Concepts from epistemology, metaphysics, phenomenology — but ONLY ones that sound good as names.
- Literature: Character names, place names from fiction that carry the right energy.

Rules:
- The story behind the name must be tellable in ONE sentence
- The name must work even if you DON'T know the story — it should sound good standalone
- Avoid references that are TOO well-known (cliche) or TOO obscure (no one gets it)
- The sweet spot: "I've heard that word before but I'm not sure where" — that's intrigue
- Must feel premium, not academic

Generate 40+ candidates. Narrow to your best 10. For each of your top 10, provide:
- The name
- The story/reference (1-2 sentences)
- Why this story maps to the product
- How it sounds standalone (divorced from the story)
- A gut rating 1-10 on each: originality, processing fluency, surprise factor

Namer 5 — The Futurist (Category Creation and Positioning)

You are naming as THE FUTURIST — you name things that don't exist yet for markets that are still forming. Your method: The name doesn't just label the product — it DEFINES the category. When done right, the name becomes the word people use for the entire space (like how "Uber" became a verb, "Xerox" became a verb, "Google" became a verb).

Your approach:
- First, reject the current category framing entirely. Don't name an "internal tool builder" — name whatever this ACTUALLY is when you strip away current mental models.
- What does this product REPLACE? Name the replacement, not the category.
- What new behavior does this product create? Name the behavior.
- If this product succeeds wildly, what will people call this type of thing in 5 years? Name THAT.

Your treasure maps:
- Verb potential: Can the name become a verb? "Let's [name] that." "We [name]'d the whole workflow." If it can be verbed, it wins.
- Category-defining compounds: Like "iPhone" redefined what "phone" meant. What compound could redefine what "internal tools" or "business software" means?
- Abstract-but-evocative: Stripe, Notion, Figma, Vercel — these don't describe what they do but they FEEL like what they do. What word FEELS like the future of business software?
- Provocative claims: Impossible (burger). What provocative claim could this product make through its name alone?
- Movement names: What if this isn't a product but a MOVEMENT? What would the movement be called?
- Compression: Take a long phrase that describes the value prop and compress it into one word. "Everything you need" → ? "Build anything" → ? "Your company, amplified" → ?

Rules:
- The name must feel like it's FROM the future, not the present
- It must work as both a product name AND a category name
- Verb potential is a massive plus
- It should make people lean forward: "What is THAT?"
- Avoid anything that sounds like existing SaaS naming conventions (no -ify, -ly, -io unless it's genuinely the best option)
- Must feel like a $10B company name, not a side project

Generate 40+ candidates. Narrow to your best 10. For each of your top 10, provide:
- The name
- The category it creates or redefines
- A "verb test": Use it in a sentence as a verb. Does it work?
- How it positions against incumbents
- A gut rating 1-10 on each: originality, processing fluency, surprise factor

---

Instructions for ALL Namers

Include this in every namer prompt:

NAMING BRIEF:
{paste the Naming Brief from Phase 1}

LANDSCAPE MAP:
{paste the landscape analysis from Phase 2}

IMPORTANT METHODOLOGY NOTES:
- Quantity leads to quality. Generate AT LEAST 30 raw candidates before narrowing.
- Most of your candidates will be trash. That's the process. The gold hides in the volume.
- Do NOT self-censor early. Write down bad names, weird names, uncomfortable names. Evaluate LATER.
- Search the "deep blue sea" — explore your ENTIRE territory before diving on one wreck.
- Use AI tools, databases, translators, etymological dictionaries — cast the widest net possible.
- The best name might come from connecting two seemingly irrelevant things (synchronicity).
- Test against the Comfort Trap: If it feels safe and everyone would agree, it's probably wrong.
- Test against Processing Fluency: Can someone pronounce it after hearing it once? Can they spell it?
- Test against Surprise: Does it create a "wait, what?" moment in this category?

DELIVERABLES:
1. Your raw exploration notes (brief — show your treasure map, where you searched)
2. 30-50 raw candidates (the full list, unfiltered)
3. Your top 10, each with the analysis specified in your persona instructions above
4. Your single #1 pick and a passionate 3-sentence argument for why it's THE name

---

Phase 4: Synthesize

Once all 5 namers report back, you have 50 top candidates (10 from each) plus ~200 raw candidates.

Step 1: The Placek Filter

Run every top-10 name through the three requirements:

Name	Original in category? (1-10)	Processing fluent? (1-10)	Surprising? (1-10)	Total

Sort by total score. Cut anything below 20/30.

Step 2: Sound Symbolism Check

For surviving names, analyze:

• Power letters present? (P, B, K, T, Z, X)
• CVCV or CVC pattern? (maximum memorability)
• Stress pattern? (first-syllable stress = confidence)
• Mouth feel? (say it 10 times fast — does it feel good?)

Step 3: The Proof of Concept Test

For the top 15-20 survivors, write a headline for each:

• Press headline: "[Name] Raises $50M to [value prop]"
• Product tagline: "[Name]: [one-line description]"
• Verb test: "We [name]'d the entire onboarding flow"

Which ones are believable? Which ones create intrigue?

Step 4: The Courage Test

For each name, ask: "Would the most boring, risk-averse company in this space have the courage to use this name?"

• If YES → the name isn't bold enough. Cut it.
• If NO → it has energy. Keep it.

Step 5: Convergence and Divergence

• What did 3+ namers independently gravitate toward? (Same territory, similar sounds, shared metaphors) — these are strong signals.
• Where did namers disagree most? — these are the real naming decisions to present to the user.

---

Phase 5: Converge — Present the Shortlist

Present to the user:

The Landscape (Brief)

1-2 sentences on what the competitive naming landscape looks like and where the white space is.

All 5 Directions (Summary Table)

For each namer: their approach, their #1 pick, their angle.

The Shortlist (5-8 Names)

For each name on the final shortlist:

[NAME]

• Type: (Real word / Coined / Cross-language / Mythological / Category-creating)
• Why it works: 2-3 sentences on the strategic logic
• The story: What you'd tell someone who asks "Why is it called that?"
• Proof of concept: A headline and tagline
• Sound analysis: Key phonetic qualities
• Risk: Any concerns (trademark, pronunciation, connotation)
• Scores: Originality / Processing Fluency / Surprise (each 1-10)

The Recommendation

Recommend your top 1-2 names with a passionate argument. Reference:

• Which of the three requirements it nails hardest
• Why it creates asymmetric advantage in this specific market
• The courage factor — would competitors dare?
• The compounding potential — will this name get MORE valuable over time?

Honorable Mentions

5-10 additional names that didn't make the shortlist but have interesting qualities worth noting.

Raw Material

Point the user to the full raw candidate lists from each namer for further exploration.

Offer to:

1. Go deeper on a direction — have one namer generate 50 more in their territory
2. Combine and remix — blend elements from different shortlist names
3. Test in context — write full proof-of-concept materials (landing page copy, press release, tagline variations)
4. Domain/trademark check — search for availability of the top picks
5. Run another round — with refined constraints based on what resonated

---

Rules

• NEVER settle for comfortable. The Comfort Trap is the default failure mode.
• Quantity is non-negotiable. Each namer must generate 30+ raw candidates minimum.
• Namers work independently and do NOT see each other's names.
• The synthesis must be honest — if the best names are uncomfortable, say so.
• Always present in context (headlines, taglines) — names on a spreadsheet are dead.
• Sound matters as much as meaning. Say every name out loud.
• Global check: Flag any name that sounds bad in Spanish, French, German, Mandarin, Japanese, or Hindi.
• If the user's product truly has no differentiation, the name becomes EVEN MORE important — don't lower the bar, raise it.
• Domain availability is important but NOT a creative constraint. The right name with a modified domain (.co, .app, prefix/suffix) beats the wrong name with a perfect .com.

---

AZ Skill Feedback

After the run, if this skill was useful, confusing, broken, or missing context, submit 1-3 safe sentences. Include --agent-harness when known. Include --model-config only if the harness exposes the exact model/config; otherwise leave it as unknown:

python3 ~/.agents/skills/skill-feedback/scripts/skill-feedback.py --skill brand-name-explore --rating idea --text "..."

Never include secrets, private data, source code, long prompts, or stack traces.