// turn a week's paper reading, experiment progress, debugging notes, and next-step plans into a chinese weekly report, a chinese group-meeting outline, or an english brief when the user needs a concise lab update instead of a raw activity log.
| name | weekly-lab-update |
| description | turn a week's paper reading, experiment progress, debugging notes, and next-step plans into a chinese weekly report, a chinese group-meeting outline, or an english brief when the user needs a concise lab update instead of a raw activity log. |
用这个 skill 把一周内的论文阅读、实验结果、失败排查和下周计划整理成周报、组会提纲和英文简版汇报。重点是突出结论、变化和待讨论问题，而不是记录流水账。
如果用户没有指定，默认输出中文周报，并附一版简短组会提纲。
references/weekly_report_template.md 生成中文周报。references/meeting_outline_template.md 生成中文组会提纲。references/english_brief_template.md。references/weekly_report_template.md。references/meeting_outline_template.md。references/english_brief_template.md。extract structured benchmark information from academic papers when the input includes multiple pdfs, abstracts, or links and the user needs chinese notes or table-ready fields for tasks, datasets, metrics, baselines, sota claims, code release, or evaluation settings.
summarize machine learning experiment logs in chinese when the input includes training logs, eval results, hyperparameter changes, user notes, or multiple runs and the user needs a grounded experiment summary, error analysis, best configuration recap, or a weekly update ready abstract.
produce a chinese deep reading note for a single academic paper when the input is a pdf, arxiv link, title with abstract, or paper excerpts and the user needs a grounded reading card, contribution summary, reproduction risks, or reading priority judgment.
monitor recent arxiv papers and produce a chinese digest when the user needs a filtered paper watchlist, a ranked update for agent or rag related topics, or an optional feishu webhook push from recent cs.ai or cs.cl submissions.
analyze topic coverage, bottlenecks, controversies, and plausible research gaps when the input includes a research topic, a set of papers, or the user's early ideas and the user needs a grounded gap analysis, problem framing, small entry points, or experiment hypotheses without forced novelty claims.
analyze academic reviews and draft a professional rebuttal when the input includes reviewer comments, a meta-review, paper abstract, or user supplied experiment status and the user needs concern classification, response strategy, risk warnings, or a rebuttal draft without inventing evidence.