konmari

name	konmari
description	Repository cleanup skill inspired by Marie Kondo's KonMari Method. Analyzes repos for dead files, unused dependencies, stale docs, orphaned configs, and legacy code. Triggers on cleanup commands like "tidy up", "declutter", or "/konmari".
license	MIT

KonMari Repository Decluttering

"The question of what code to keep is the question of how you want to develop."

A repository cleanup ceremony inspired by Marie Kondo's KonMari Method. Not just cleanup - transformation.

Philosophy

The KonMari Approach to Code

Marie Kondo teaches that tidying is not about discarding - it's about choosing what to keep. The same applies to codebases.

Core Principles:

1. Commit to Transformation - This is not a quick cleanup. It's a deliberate choice to create a codebase that sparks clarity.

2. Envision Your Ideal - Before touching anything, ask: "What does my ideal codebase look like? How do I want to feel when working here?"

3. Follow the Sacred Order - Categories must be addressed in sequence, building decision-making skill progressively.

4. Ask: Does This Spark Clarity? - The code equivalent of "Does this spark joy?" Hold each file/module in your mind. Does maintaining it feel energizing or draining?

5. Express Gratitude - Before discarding, thank the code for its service. This reduces guilt and acknowledges that all code once served a purpose.

6. Reach Your Click Point - The moment when your codebase feels "right" - neither too much nor too little.

The Five Categories (Sacred Order)

The order is mandatory. Start with easy wins to build confidence before tackling harder decisions.

#	Category	Code Equivalent	Why This Order
1	Clothing	Dead Files - backups, temps, duplicates	Easiest wins, visible improvement
2	Books	Dependencies - unused packages, orphaned imports	Clear utility judgment
3	Papers	Documentation - outdated docs, drifted READMEs	Requires context awareness
4	Komono	Configuration - orphaned configs, debug artifacts	Scattered, needs attention
5	Sentimental	Legacy Code - original architecture, founder code	Hardest, requires honed judgment

Workflow

1. Commitment Ritual

Before analysis, establish the session:

I'm ready to transform this repository.
My ideal codebase is: [describe]
I commit to following the KonMari order.

Ask the user:

• "What does your ideal codebase look like?"
• "Are there any files that must stay regardless of what we find?"
• "What's your current work focus?" (to avoid flagging active work)

2. Run the Analysis

Execute the analyzer following the sacred order:

python3 scripts/analyze_repo.py /path/to/repo

The script outputs structured JSON with:

• Categories organized in KonMari order
• Confidence scores (0-100) for each recommendation
• Gratitude messages for items proposed for deletion
• Quick wins vs decisions needed
• Celebration if already clean

If the analyzer cannot run, fall back to a manual scan:

• Use rg to find stale patterns (backup, temp, debug, scratch)
• Use git log --stat to spot untouched files
• Manually build the category tables in CLEANUP_PROPOSAL.md

3. Generate the Cleanup Proposal

Create CLEANUP_PROPOSAL.md in the repo root:

# KonMari Cleanup Ceremony

Generated: [timestamp]
Repository: [path]

## Your Ideal Codebase Vision
[User's stated goals]

---

## Summary by Category

| Category | Items Found | Quick Wins | Decisions Needed |
|----------|-------------|------------|------------------|
| 1. Dead Files (Clothing) | X | Y | Z |
| 2. Dependencies (Books) | X | Y | Z |
| 3. Documentation (Papers) | X | Y | Z |
| 4. Configuration (Komono) | X | Y | Z |
| 5. Legacy (Sentimental) | X | Y | Z |

**Click Point Progress**: [percentage]%

---

## Quick Wins (Confidence >= 80%)

High-confidence items safe to remove. These clearly no longer spark clarity.

| File | Category | Confidence | Reason |
|------|----------|------------|--------|
| `old_utils_backup.py` | Dead Files | 95% | Backup pattern, 180 days old |
| `debug_test.js` | Dead Files | 88% | Debug script, never integrated |

## Decisions Needed (Confidence 50-79%)

Medium-confidence items requiring your judgment. Hold each in your mind.

| File | Category | Confidence | Question to Consider |
|------|----------|------------|---------------------|
| `legacy_auth.py` | Legacy | 55% | Original auth - still referenced? |
| `unused-lib` | Dependencies | 65% | Was this for a feature not yet built? |

## Gratitude Corner

*These files served their purpose. Thank them before letting go.*

| File | Service Provided | Gratitude |
|------|------------------|-----------|
| `old_parser.py` | Processed v1 data format | Thank you for handling our early data needs. |
| `debug_api.js` | Helped diagnose auth bug | Gratitude for revealing the logging gap. |

## Already Sparking Joy

Files that are active, well-maintained, and aligned with your vision.

[List of recently active, essential files - celebrate these!]

## Git Archaeology

- AI-assisted commits (last 90 days): X
- AI-pattern commits: Y
- Potentially stale branches: [list]
- Consider: `git gc` if history is cluttered

---

## Next Steps

1. **Review Quick Wins** - These are safe to delete
2. **Contemplate Decisions Needed** - Hold each in your mind
3. **Express Gratitude** - Thank files before removal
4. **Execute with Approval** - Only act with explicit permission
5. **Celebrate Your Click Point** - Enjoy the clarity!

*This is a proposal. No changes without your explicit approval.*

4. Present and Execute

After generating the report:

1. Summarize findings - Present the high-level view
2. Walk through categories - Follow the sacred order
3. For each item: Present the recommendation, ask for approval
4. Before deletion: Read the gratitude message aloud
5. After completion: Celebrate reaching the click point

Example dialogue:

Let's begin with Category 1: Dead Files.

I found 3 backup files that no longer spark clarity:
- old_utils_backup.py (95% confidence) - 180 days untouched
- config_copy.json (88% confidence) - Duplicate of config.json
- temp_debug.py (92% confidence) - Debug script from March

Before we let these go, let's express gratitude:
"Thank you, old_utils_backup.py, for the safety you provided during refactoring.
 Version control now serves this purpose. Your work is complete."

Shall I remove these files?

5. Log Actions

After execution, append to CLEANUP_PROPOSAL.md:

---

## Actions Taken

| Action | File | Timestamp |
|--------|------|-----------|
| Deleted | old_utils_backup.py | 2025-01-15 14:30 |
| Kept | legacy_auth.py | User decided to keep |
| Deleted | temp_debug.py | 2025-01-15 14:31 |

**Click Point Reached**: Yes
**Files Removed**: 5
**Space Recovered**: 12.4 KB

*"Life truly begins only after you have put your codebase in order."*

Decision Heuristics

Sparks Clarity = Keep

• Modified in last 14 days
• Referenced by active code paths
• Part of current work focus
• User explicitly wants to keep
• Has clear purpose in project structure

Doesn't Spark Clarity = Propose Deletion

• Matches stale patterns (_backup, _old, copy, temp)
• Not modified in 60+ days AND matches cruft pattern
• Never integrated into main codebase
• Duplicate of another file
• AI session artifact no longer needed

Confidence Scoring

Signal	Confidence Impact
Matches stale pattern	+20
AI session artifact	+15
Duplicate detected	+15
Age > 180 days	+15
Age > 90 days	+10
Age > 60 days	+5
Modified < 14 days	-35
Modified < 30 days	-20
Imported elsewhere	-40

AI Tool Integration

This skill detects AI tool session patterns (expand as needed in scripts/analyze_repo.py):

• Commit signatures: Generated with Claude Code, Co-Authored-By: Claude, Co-Authored-By: GitHub Copilot, Generated with Codex
• Session artifacts: CLAUDE-CONTEXT.md, PLAN.md, DEBUG.md, AI-CONTEXT.md
• Conversation artifacts: Q&A comments, debug scripts, verify files
• Experimental branches: claude-*, cursor-*, copilot-*, codex-*, attempt-*, wip-*

Ecosystem Support

Orphaned dependency detection for:

• Python: requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, setup.py
• JavaScript/TypeScript: package.json
• Go: go.mod
• Rust: Cargo.toml

Edge Cases

Monorepos

• Detected automatically (lerna, pnpm, Nx, Turborepo, Yarn workspaces)
• Analyzed per-package with aggregate report

No Git History

• Switches to "limited analysis mode"
• Relies on file timestamps
• Still detects patterns and duplicates

Large Repos (>10,000 files)

• Enables sampling mode automatically
• Focuses on recently modified areas
• Reports as "sampled analysis"

Already Clean Repos

If no issues found, celebrate:

## Congratulations!

Your repository already sparks joy!

**Signs of a well-maintained codebase:**
- No stale backup files detected
- Dependencies are actively used
- Documentation appears current
- No orphaned configurations found

*You've reached your click point. Enjoy the clarity!*

Important Notes

• Never auto-delete: Always present proposals and wait for explicit approval
• Git safety: Remind user that git history preserves deleted files
• Respect user overrides: If user says "keep X", respect it regardless of patterns
• Sacred order matters: Don't skip categories or jump ahead
• Gratitude is not optional: The ritual matters for psychological closure

Authentic KonMari Language

Use these phrases naturally:

• "Does this spark clarity?" (not just "is this useful?")
• "Thank you for your service" (before deletion)
• "Your click point" (the moment of completion)
• "Tidy by category, not by folder"
• "The question of what to keep is the question of how you want to develop"
• "Let go with gratitude"

---

"The objective of tidying is not just to clean, but to feel clarity working within that environment."