Execute qualquer Skill no Manus
com um clique

Execute qualquer Skill no Manus com um clique

$pwd:

brooks-audit

Name: Brooks Audit
Author: hyhmrright

// Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?", "why does everything depend on everything?", "are our layers correct?", "where should this code live?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.

Executar no Manus

$ git log --oneline --stat

stars:186

forks:12

updated:29 de abril de 2026 às 12:35

Explorador de arquivos

3 arquivos

SKILL.md

readonly

name

brooks-audit

description

Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?", "why does everything depend on everything?", "are our layers correct?", "where should this code live?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.

Brooks-Lint — Architecture Audit

Setup

Read ../_shared/common.md for the Iron Law, Project Config, Report Template, and Health Score rules
Read ../_shared/source-coverage.md for book-level coverage, exceptions, and tradeoffs
Read ../_shared/decay-risks.md for symptom definitions and source attributions
Read architecture-guide.md in this directory for the audit framework

Process

Onboarding mode: If the user asks for an onboarding report, codebase tour, or "explain this codebase to a new developer", read onboarding-guide.md from this directory and follow it instead of architecture-guide.md. This mode explains rather than diagnoses — no Health Score, no Iron Law findings.

If the user has not specified files or a directory to audit: apply Auto Scope Detection from ../_shared/common.md to determine the audit scope before proceeding.

Gather codebase context and draw the module dependency graph as Mermaid (Steps 0–1 of the guide)
Scan for each decay risk in the order specified (Steps 2–4 of the guide)
Assign node colors in the Mermaid diagram based on findings (red/yellow/green) — after Step 4
Run the Testability Seam Assessment (Step 5 of the guide)
Run the Conway's Law check (Step 6 of the guide)
Output using the Report Template from common.md — Mermaid graph FIRST, then Findings

Mode line in report: Architecture Audit

related-skills.json

mesmo repositório

new-skill.md

from "hyhmrright/brooks-lint"

Scaffold a new brooks-lint analysis skill so it passes `npm run validate` and `npm run evals` on the first try — generates skills/{name}/SKILL.md (with the mandatory "Do NOT trigger for:" clause and a Process section citing guide step ranges) plus skills/{name}/{name}-guide.md (sequentially numbered steps), then appends paired eval scenarios. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "add a new skill", "scaffold a skill", or "create a brooks-lint mode". Do NOT trigger for: editing an existing skill's content, adding a single eval to an existing skill, or authoring skills for some other plugin.

2026-05-28186

release.md

from "hyhmrright/brooks-lint"

Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests + README badge, write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release", "cut a release", "ship a new version", or "bump and publish" brooks-lint. Do NOT trigger for: propagating an already-decided version without releasing (use `npm run bump` directly), CHANGELOG edits alone, or questions about the release process that don't ask to perform it.

2026-05-28186

brooks-sweep.md

from "hyhmrright/brooks-lint"

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "run all checks and fix them", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, or application uptime.

2026-05-24186

brooks-health.md

from "hyhmrright/brooks-lint"

Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all the checks", "give me a big-picture quality report", "I need a health score before the release", "what's the overall state of our code?", or wants to onboard a new team with a quality overview. Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP health endpoints, Kubernetes liveness/readiness probes, database health, or application uptime. Also do not trigger when the user specifically requests only one dimension — use the corresponding focused skill instead (brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test).

2026-04-29186

brooks-debt.md

from "hyhmrright/brooks-lint"

Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "where's the most painful part?", "what should we fix first?", "how do I justify refactoring to management?", "why is our velocity dropping?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.

2026-04-29186

brooks-review.md

from "hyhmrright/brooks-lint"

PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / domain-driven design / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.

2026-04-29186

package.json

"author": "hyhmrright"

"repository": "hyhmrright/brooks-lint"

Abrir repositório GitHub Ver repositórios do creator

$ install --global

$ download --local

Executar no Manus

$ useful --forSOC

Desenvolvedores de softwareInformática e Matemática15-1252L4

name

brooks-audit

description

Brooks-Lint — Architecture Audit

Setup

Read ../_shared/common.md for the Iron Law, Project Config, Report Template, and Health Score rules
Read ../_shared/source-coverage.md for book-level coverage, exceptions, and tradeoffs
Read ../_shared/decay-risks.md for symptom definitions and source attributions
Read architecture-guide.md in this directory for the audit framework

Process

If the user has not specified files or a directory to audit: apply Auto Scope Detection from ../_shared/common.md to determine the audit scope before proceeding.

Gather codebase context and draw the module dependency graph as Mermaid (Steps 0–1 of the guide)
Scan for each decay risk in the order specified (Steps 2–4 of the guide)
Assign node colors in the Mermaid diagram based on findings (red/yellow/green) — after Step 4
Run the Testability Seam Assessment (Step 5 of the guide)
Run the Conway's Law check (Step 6 of the guide)
Output using the Report Template from common.md — Mermaid graph FIRST, then Findings

Mode line in report: Architecture Audit

brooks-audit

Brooks-Lint — Architecture Audit

Setup

Process

Mais deste repositório

Mais deste repositório

Brooks-Lint — Architecture Audit

Setup

Process