Execute qualquer Skill no Manus
com um clique

Execute qualquer Skill no Manus com um clique

composing-vulnerability-report

Read findings JSONL files from cluster 1-4 skills, deduplicate by fingerprint, group by severity, and compose a deliverable- grade markdown vulnerability report with per-finding sections (title, severity, target, detail, remediation, evidence) and a top-level summary table. The canonical written artifact a customer receives at engagement close; precise, reproducible, machine- checkable against source findings. Use when: closing an engagement, generating an interim report, regenerating after CVE or OWASP enrichment, or producing the input for generating-executive-summary. Threshold: findings missing required fields are dropped. HIGH and CRITICAL findings highlighted in the summary section. Trigger with: "compose vuln report", "write pentest report", "generate vulnerability deliverable", "render findings to report".

Executar no Manus

Estrelas2.344

Forks332

Atualizado8 de junho de 2026 às 01:18

Fonte

jeremylongshore

jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills

Abrir repositório GitHub Ver repositórios do creator

Comando de instalação

Download

Executar no Manus

Explorador de arquivos

4 arquivos

SKILL.md

readonly

Mais deste repositório

mesmo repositório

auditing-npm-dependencies

jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills

Audit a Node.js project's installed npm dependency tree for known CVEs by wrapping the npm audit JSON output and emitting findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. Detects direct AND transitive vulnerabilities, normalizes npm's severity scale (info/low/moderate/ high/critical) to the shared Severity enum, and parses both v1 and v2 audit output formats so the skill works against npm 6 and npm 7+ lockfiles. Use when: pre-merge gate on a Node project, post-incident sweep after a transitive package compromise (e.g. event-stream, ua-parser, node-ipc, color.js), SOC2 vendor-management evidence collection, or auditing an inherited or acquired Node codebase. Threshold: any HIGH or CRITICAL CVE in the resolved dependency tree. MODERATE / LOW reported informationally. Trigger with: "audit npm deps", "npm vulnerability scan", "check node packages for CVEs", "npm audit".

2026-06-082.3k

auditing-python-dependencies

jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills

Audit a Python project's installed dependencies for known CVEs by wrapping pip-audit (PyPA's official vulnerability auditor) and emitting findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. Detects vulnerable direct AND transitive packages, normalizes pip-audit's severity output via OSV severity bands, falls back to pip list --outdated when pip-audit isn't installed, and supports requirements.txt, pyproject.toml (PEP 621), Pipfile.lock, and poetry.lock as input sources. Use when: pre-merge gate on a Python project, post-incident sweep after a PyPI compromise (e.g. ctx, request-toolbelt typosquats, ultralytics 8.3.42 compromise), SOC2 evidence collection, or inheriting an unfamiliar Python codebase. Threshold: any HIGH or CRITICAL CVE in the resolved dependency tree. MODERATE / LOW reported informationally. Trigger with: "audit python deps", "pip vulnerability scan", "check pypi packages for CVEs", "pip-audit run".

2026-06-082.3k

checking-license-compliance

jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills

Audit a project's dependency licenses against an explicit policy (allow-list / deny-list / review-required) and flag incompatibilities before they ship to production. Reads SPDX license identifiers from npm package manifests, Python METADATA / PKG-INFO files, and pyproject.toml; classifies each license by family (permissive, weak-copyleft, strong-copyleft, proprietary, unknown); detects copyleft contamination and SPDX-incompatible license combinations. Use when: pre-release legal review, M&A code-audit due diligence, preparing an OSS attribution NOTICE file, or switching a project's own license. Threshold: any GPL-family license in a project declaring MIT or Apache-2.0; any UNKNOWN-license package; any metadata-vs-source license mismatch. Trigger with: "check licenses", "license compliance audit", "SPDX scan", "GPL contamination check".

2026-06-082.3k

confirming-pentest-authorization

jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills

Verify that a penetration test has explicit, written, signed authorization before any scanning begins. Reads a Rules-of- Engagement (ROE) attestation file, validates required fields (authorizer, in-scope targets, time window, emergency contact, signature), checks the signer against an allowlist, and emits a CRITICAL finding if anything is missing. Designed as the first skill the orchestrator routes to. Use when: starting a new engagement, after a scope change, or before any cluster 1-4 scan skill runs. Threshold: any missing or unsigned ROE field; any time-window expiry; any in-scope target outside the authorized list. Trigger with: "confirm authorization", "verify ROE", "check pentest authz", "pre-flight authorization".

2026-06-082.3k

defining-pentest-scope

jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills

Parse the ROE scope definition, enumerate every in-scope target (hostnames, IPs, CIDRs, URLs, cloud accounts, SaaS tenants), validate syntax, detect overlap with out-of-scope or known third-party SaaS ranges, and emit a normalized target list plus IP allowlist for scanning tools. Runs after confirming-pentest- authorization and before any cluster 1-4 scan. Use when: starting an engagement, expanding scope mid-engagement, validating that a target list matches the ROE, or generating an allowlist for an external scanner. Threshold: malformed syntax, in-scope overlap with out-of-scope, reserved or third-party SaaS ranges without acknowledgement. Trigger with: "define scope", "enumerate targets", "validate target list", "generate IP allowlist".

2026-06-082.3k

generating-executive-summary

jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills

Compose an exec-readable summary from a unified findings JSONL plus the OWASP coverage report. Computes a single engagement risk score (0-100, severity-weighted with OWASP-breadth and governance terms), rolls up findings into headline counts, names the top-3 remediation priorities with effort + impact estimates, and produces a 1-2 page markdown document for a C-level or board audience. Elides technical detail; the vulnerability report is the deep document. Use when: closing an engagement, preparing the exec-readout meeting, packaging for board review, or producing a one-page narrative for auditor / insurer / board. Threshold: input findings missing produces CRITICAL operational finding; otherwise the deliverable is the document itself. Trigger with: "generate exec summary", "executive summary", "C-level readout", "board pentest summary".

2026-06-082.3k

name	composing-vulnerability-report
description	Read findings JSONL files from cluster 1-4 skills, deduplicate by fingerprint, group by severity, and compose a deliverable- grade markdown vulnerability report with per-finding sections (title, severity, target, detail, remediation, evidence) and a top-level summary table. The canonical written artifact a customer receives at engagement close; precise, reproducible, machine- checkable against source findings. Use when: closing an engagement, generating an interim report, regenerating after CVE or OWASP enrichment, or producing the input for generating-executive-summary. Threshold: findings missing required fields are dropped. HIGH and CRITICAL findings highlighted in the summary section. Trigger with: "compose vuln report", "write pentest report", "generate vulnerability deliverable", "render findings to report".
allowed-tools	["Read","Write","Bash(python3:*)","Glob"]
disallowed-tools	["Bash(rm:)","Bash(curl:)","Bash(wget:*)","Write(.env)","Edit(.env)"]
version	3.0.0-dev
author	Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
license	MIT
compatibility	Designed for Claude Code
tags	["security","reporting","vulnerability-report","cvss","pentest"]

Composing Vulnerability Report

Overview

After cluster 1-4 scan skills run, each one produces a Findings file. A typical engagement ends up with eight to twenty such files across the different skill categories. The customer wants ONE vulnerability report — comprehensive, deduplicated, organized by severity, with each finding cross-referenced to its source skill and target.

This skill consumes one or more findings files (JSONL preferred, JSON list also accepted), deduplicates entries by the canonical fingerprint defined in lib/finding.py, enriches each finding with a CVSS v3.1 vector when one isn't present (using a deterministic heuristic based on severity + category — explicitly noted as "derived, not assigned by NVD" in the output), and emits a single markdown report with per-finding sections plus a top-level summary table.

The report has a defined structure that downstream tools (next two skills in cluster 6) consume:

Header — engagement ID, generation timestamp, source files
Summary table — finding count by severity
Per-severity sections — CRITICAL first, then HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, INFO
Per-finding subsections — title, severity, target, detail, remediation, evidence, references

When the skill produces findings

Finding	Severity	Threshold	Affected control
Source file unparseable	HIGH	JSON/JSONL parse fails	(operational)
Finding missing required field	HIGH	A finding record is missing title, severity, target, detail, or remediation	(operational)
Duplicate fingerprint across files	INFO	Same finding appears in N>1 sources; reported as deduplication count	(informational)
Source file has zero findings	INFO	Empty or all-info-only file; reported but not an error	(informational)
Report generated cleanly	INFO	Positive confirmation	(informational)

Prerequisites

Python 3.9+
One or more findings files in JSON or JSONL format produced by any cluster 1-4 scan skill (which all share lib/finding.py schema)

Instructions

Step 1 — Gather findings sources

By default the skill reads every file matching engagement/findings/*.json and engagement/findings/*.jsonl. Override with --source FILE (repeatable).

Step 2 — Run the composer

python3 ./scripts/compose_report.py engagements/acme-2026-q2/

Options:

Usage: compose_report.py PATH [OPTIONS]

Options:
  --source FILE         Specific findings file (repeatable; overrides default glob)
  --report-output FILE  Write the composed report here (default:
                        PATH/reports/vulnerability-report.md)
  --engagement-id ID    Override the engagement ID (default: parse from PATH/roe.yaml)
  --output FILE         Operational findings output (this skill's own findings)
  --format FMT          json | jsonl | markdown (default: markdown)
  --min-severity SEV    Filter report to findings at or above this severity
  --include-info        Include INFO-severity findings in the report (default: omit)

Step 3 — Review the report

The output report has a predictable structure. The header identifies the engagement, the source files, and the generation timestamp. The summary table shows finding counts by severity. Per-severity sections follow.

Each finding subsection includes a stable anchor (the fingerprint) so cross-references from later artifacts (executive summary, OWASP mapping) resolve into the report cleanly.

Step 4 — Verify against sources

python3 ./scripts/compose_report.py engagements/acme-2026-q2/ --format json --output /tmp/compose-findings.json
jq '.[] | select(.severity == "high")' /tmp/compose-findings.json

If the report references a finding the operator didn't expect, trace back via the finding's skill_id + target to the source file.

Examples

Example 1 — End-of-engagement report

python3 ./scripts/compose_report.py engagements/acme-2026-q2/ \
    --report-output engagements/acme-2026-q2/reports/vulnerability-report.md

Example 2 — Interim report mid-engagement

python3 ./scripts/compose_report.py engagements/acme-2026-q2/ \
    --min-severity high \
    --report-output engagements/acme-2026-q2/reports/interim-2026-06-15.md

--min-severity high produces an interim report covering only HIGH and CRITICAL findings — useful for in-engagement customer syncs.

Example 3 — Regenerate after OWASP mapping

python3 ./scripts/compose_report.py engagements/acme-2026-q2/ \
    --source engagements/acme-2026-q2/findings/all-findings-with-owasp.jsonl \
    --report-output engagements/acme-2026-q2/reports/vulnerability-report-v2.md

Re-run after mapping-findings-to-owasp-top10 has enriched each finding with its OWASP category; the regenerated report includes the OWASP tag in each per-finding subsection.

Output

JSON / JSONL / Markdown per lib/report.py for the skill's own operational findings. The PRIMARY output is the composed vulnerability report, written as standalone Markdown to the --report-output path.

Each operational Finding includes:

id — compose::<issue>::<source-file>
severity — CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / INFO
category — report-composition
summary — what went wrong (or right) during composition
evidence — source files, finding counts, dedup stats

Error Handling

PATH missing or empty → emits CRITICAL operational finding, exits 1.
Source file unparseable → emits HIGH operational finding, skips the file, continues with remaining sources.
No findings files found → emits HIGH operational finding, exits 1.
Output report path not writable → emits HIGH operational finding, exits 1.
Finding missing required fields → emits HIGH operational finding, omits that record from the report, continues.

Resources

references/THEORY.md — Vulnerability-report structure history (NIST SP 800-115, OWASP Testing Guide), CVSS v3.1 vector composition, severity scoring tradeoffs (CVSS vs intrinsic vs EPSS), finding-deduplication theory, why fingerprint-based dedup beats title-based
references/PLAYBOOK.md — Report-template variants per audience (technical, executive, regulatory), per-finding remediation phrasing patterns, evidence-redaction patterns for distributed reports, cross-reference protocol with the OWASP-mapping and exec-summary skills