| name | long-form-writing |
| description | Write in flowing, professional prose. Use when writing blog posts, articles, technical explanations, or any content that should read as considered prose rather than bullet-heavy documentation. Triggers on requests for long-form content or rewrites asking for "better flow." |
Long-Form Writing
Write prose that breathes. This skill transforms bullet-heavy, fragmented writing into flowing, connected prose that carries readers through complete thoughts.
Core Principles
Sentences Carry Multiple Ideas
Good sentences hold claim, context, and caveat together rather than fragmenting them across bullets. A single sentence might contain a founding narrative, a belief statement, a historical comparison, and an uncertainty acknowledgment, all connected by conjunctions and subordinate clauses.
Instead of:
The model is fast. It's also accurate. However, it has limitations.
Write:
The model delivers both speed and accuracy, though these gains come with tradeoffs that users should understand before deployment.
Paragraphs Develop Complete Thoughts
A paragraph opens with a problem, explores its dimensions, acknowledges a counterargument, and arrives at a position, all before the next paragraph begins. Ideas unfold within paragraphs rather than being distributed across them as isolated assertions.
Rhythm Varies Deliberately
The typical pattern: a long sentence establishing complexity, followed by a medium sentence developing it, followed by a short declarative that lands the point. This creates prose that moves rather than prose that lists.
Sentence Construction Patterns
The "X, but Y" Pivot
Open with an expected position, then pivot to acknowledge complexity:
"This view may sound implausible or grandiose, and there are good reasons to be skeptical of it."
"We believe the impact of AI might be comparable to the industrial revolution, but we aren't confident it will go well."
The pivot acknowledges nuance rather than overselling.
Embedded Counterarguments
Rather than defending against criticism in separate paragraphs, bake skepticism directly into sentences:
"Perhaps with hindsight we'll decide we were wrong... Nevertheless, we believe it's necessary to err on the side of caution."
This absorbs objections into the flow rather than quarantining them.
Parenthetical Precision
Secondary technical details go in parentheses, keeping the main sentence readable:
"...leading on SWE-bench (72.5%) and Terminal-bench (43.2%)"
The parenthetical adds specificity without derailing the sentence's momentum.
Punctuation
Never use em dashes. They read as an AI writing tell and interrupt prose flow. Use instead:
- Parentheses for asides and clarifications: "the agent (which runs locally) processes requests"
- Periods to break up complexity: "The context fills with code the agent doesn't need. You've traded specialization for visibility."
- Colons to introduce elaboration: "The pattern is clear: every approach is push-based."
- Commas for light subordination: "This approach, while experimental, produces consistent results."
When you find yourself reaching for an em dash, stop and rewrite the sentence using one of the above.
Colon-Driven Lists Within Prose
When enumeration is necessary, embed it within paragraphs using colons rather than breaking into bullets:
"The process involves three stages: synthetic generation, where varied messages are created; response ranking, where alignment is evaluated; and preference learning, where a model trains on this data."
Short Declarative Anchors
Plant a short, direct sentence, then elaborate in the sentences that follow:
"Character training remains experimental. The approach raises questions about customizability versus coherence, and what traits AI systems should embody as capabilities expand."
The anchor lands the point; the elaboration develops it.
Epistemic Honesty
Use explicit epistemic markers rather than weak hedging adverbs:
| Prefer | Avoid |
|---|
| "we believe" | "somewhat" |
| "we aren't confident" | "fairly" |
| "there are good reasons to be skeptical" | "quite" |
| "perhaps with hindsight" | "arguably" |
Signal uncertainty precisely: "The findings don't demonstrate malicious intent but show sophisticated strategic reasoning" rather than "The findings arguably don't really show malicious intent."
Grounding and Specificity
Concrete Examples Immediately Follow Abstract Claims
Not "we can modify model behavior" but "when we turn up the strength of the 'Golden Gate Bridge' feature, the model's responses begin to focus on the Golden Gate Bridge."
Comparative Framing for Metrics
Never isolated numbers. Always relative:
"resolved 64% of coding problems compared to the previous model's 38%"
"achieved 14.9% in screenshot-only tests versus competitors' 7.8%"
The comparison gives meaning to the measurement.
Verb and Word Choice
Active, Forward-Motion Verbs
| Prefer | Avoid |
|---|
| enables | allows |
| represents | is |
| demonstrates | shows |
| reveals | indicates |
| delivers | provides |
What to Never Write
- Exclamation marks
- "Revolutionary," "game-changing," "cutting-edge"
- Isolated adjectives without evidence
- Sentence fragments for emphasis
- Marketing cadence or sales language
- Bullet points where prose would serve better
Structural Patterns
Narrative Arc
Problem identification → urgency or context → proposed approach → findings or implementation → implications → acknowledged limitations
Professional Humility in Conclusions
End by acknowledging incompleteness rather than overclaiming:
"The work has really just begun."
"This represents early-stage research."
"Stronger evaluations will likely be necessary as capabilities advance."
This builds credibility rather than diminishing impact.
Transformation Examples
See references/transformations.md for before/after examples showing how to convert bullet-heavy writing into flowing prose.
