| name | apply-comments |
| description | Apply pending @slide-comment markers written by the open-slide inspector tool. Use when the user asks to "apply comments", "process slide comments", "apply the inspector comments", or references markers left inside `slides/<id>/index.tsx`. |
Apply slide comments
The open-slide editor has an inspector tool that lets the user click on a rendered page element and attach a textual comment (e.g. "make this red", "change to 'Open Slide Rocks'"). Each comment is persisted as an in-source JSX marker inside slides/<slideId>/index.tsx.
Your job: read those markers, perform the described edits, and delete the markers.
Before making any page edit, consult the slide-authoring skill — it is the technical reference for how slides/<id>/index.tsx is structured (canvas, type scale, palette, assets, file contract). A comment like "make this bigger" or "change the accent colour" should be applied in a way that stays consistent with those rules.
Marker format
{/* @slide-comment id="c-<8hex>" ts="<ISO>" text="<base64url(JSON)>" */}
-
Always sits on its own line as the first child inside the JSX element it refers to (i.e. between that element's opening > and its other children). The marker is dropped into its target, not floated above it.
-
text is base64url-encoded JSON: {"note": "...", "hint"?: "..."}.
-
Detection regex (authoritative — use exactly this):
/\{\/\*\s*@slide-comment\s+id="(c-[a-f0-9]+)"\s+ts="([^"]+)"\s+text="([A-Za-z0-9_\-]+={0,2})"\s*\*\/\}/g
Procedure
-
Identify the target slide(s).
- If the user names one (
example-slide, youbike-3-survey, etc.), work on that single slides/<slideId>/index.tsx.
- If they say "all" or don't specify, scan every
slides/*/index.tsx. Process each slide one at a time.
-
Read the file and find all markers.
- Run the regex above against the whole file.
- For each match, base64url-decode
text and JSON.parse it to get { note, hint? }.
- Record each hit as
{ id, lineIndex (0-based), indent, note, hint }.
- If there are no markers, tell the user and stop.
-
Understand each comment in context.
- The targeted JSX element is the enclosing element of the marker — i.e. read upward from the marker line until you reach the unclosed JSX opening tag whose body the marker lives in. That element is the target. (For self-closing elements like
<img />, the inspector hoists the marker to the nearest non-self-closing ancestor; in that case the comment usually refers to a child of the enclosing element rather than the enclosing element itself — use the note text to disambiguate.)
- Read enough surrounding code (parent element, sibling elements, inline styles) to apply the change faithfully. A comment inside a
<div> with an inline background style usually refers to that element's styling, for example.
- If the
note is ambiguous, do the smallest reasonable interpretation and mention the assumption in your summary.
-
Apply edits in reverse line order.
- Sort markers by descending
lineIndex and process one at a time, using the Edit tool.
- Processing top-down would invalidate line numbers for later markers as the file shrinks/grows.
-
Remove each marker after applying its edit.
- Delete the entire marker line including its trailing
\n.
- Never leave a marker behind. An un-removed marker signals a failure.
-
Verify.
- After all edits, re-read the file and confirm zero remaining markers.
- Run
pnpm tsc --noEmit and pnpm biome check (or pnpm lint). Fix any introduced errors.
-
Report.
- Summarise:
N applied, 0 remaining plus a one-line description of each change (including the slide id).
base64url decoding helper
function decode(s) {
const pad = s.length % 4 === 0 ? '' : '='.repeat(4 - (s.length % 4));
return Buffer.from(s.replace(/-/g, '+').replace(/_/g, '/') + pad, 'base64').toString('utf8');
}
You can run this inline via node -e '...' if you need to inspect a payload; otherwise just reason about the decoded string.
Edge cases
- Marker with no enclosing JSX element (shouldn't happen — the inspector won't write one — but if you find one): delete it and note as orphan.
- Multiple markers stacked on consecutive lines inside the same element: they all refer to that enclosing element. Apply them in source order but still delete each line individually.
_debugSource used SWC instead of Babel: not your problem — the marker line is authoritative.
- Comment asks for something outside the target element's scope (e.g. "add a new page"): do the closest-reasonable edit and mention the scope expansion in your summary.
- Can't resolve the comment (e.g. truly ambiguous, or the file changed shape such that the target element doesn't exist): leave the marker in place and report it as skipped. Don't guess.
Do not
- Do not touch
package.json, open-slide.config.ts, or files outside slides/.
- Do not add dependencies.
- Do not re-introduce markers or leave
TODO breadcrumbs — the user already has a record in git.