| name | deal-desk |
| description | Use when reviewing a specific inbound deal before close — when sales has asked for a discount that exceeds AE authority, when the customer has redlined the MSA, when per-deal economics (margin after discount, multi-year payment shape, indemnity exposure) need to be quantified, or when discount approval needs to be routed to a named human approver (Sales Director, VP Sales, CFO, CRO, General Counsel). Covers deal review, discount approval routing, per-deal margin scoring, deal exception handling, MSA redline triage, contract landmine detection (uncapped indemnity, MFN, perpetual license-back, missing DPA), and named-approver chain assembly. NEVER auto-approves — every output is a numeric scorecard plus a routing recommendation to a named human. |
| version | 2.8.0 |
| author | claude-code-skills |
| license | MIT |
| tags | ["commercial","deal-desk","discount","margin","approval","redline","msa","terms"] |
| compatible_tools | ["claude-code","codex-cli","cursor","antigravity","opencode","gemini-cli"] |
deal-desk
Per-deal review and discount-approval routing. Scores deal margin + risk, routes discount approval to the right human, redlines T&Cs against commercial policy. Never auto-approves. Every output is a score plus a routing recommendation to a named human approver.
Purpose
Deal Desk / RevOps / sales leadership live at the moment between sales-team-asks-for-discount and CFO/CRO/legal-signs. This skill quantifies the asks and routes them.
Three deterministic tools:
deal_scorer.py — Scores a deal 0-100 across 5 dimensions (margin, risk, strategic value, commercial fit, term shape) and assigns one of four verdicts: APPROVE / REVIEW / ESCALATE / DECLINE — each tied to a named approver chain.
discount_approval_router.py — Maps a discount-percent + deal-size + tier to a named approver chain (AE → Manager → Director → VP → CFO/CRO) with estimated cycle days. Honors industry-tuned policy bands.
terms_redliner.py — Detects 10 founder/seller-killer patterns in deal terms (uncapped indemnity, MFN, perpetual license-back, missing DPA, NET-60+, broad non-solicit, etc.) with severity + standard counter + named legal/commercial approver.
When to use
Invoke this skill when:
- Sales has flagged a discount request above AE authority.
- A customer has returned a redlined MSA and you need triage before routing to legal.
- The deal needs CFO sign-off and you want a defensible margin breakdown.
- An RFP response requires multi-year terms and you need to score the shape.
- A renewal expansion is bundled with a discount and you need to verify policy fit.
- You're building a deal-desk approval queue and need consistent routing.
Do NOT use this skill to: author the proposal (use business-growth/contract-and-proposal-writer), redesign the discount matrix (use the commercial-policy sibling skill), or do deep legal redline of full contract text (use c-level-advisor/skills/general-counsel-advisor).
Workflow
- Intake the deal — Sales/AE fills
assets/deal_intake_template.md with ARR, term, discount, payment terms, customer tier, strategic flags, and any customer-flagged term redlines (20-min fill-out).
- Score margin + risk — Run
deal_scorer.py --input deal.json --profile {saas|enterprise-software|services|marketplace}. Read the composite + per-dimension breakdown + verdict.
- Route the discount — Run
discount_approval_router.py --input deal.json --profile <same>. Get the named approver chain + estimated cycle days. Modifiers (enterprise floor, SMB fast-lane) are surfaced explicitly.
- Flag the redlines — Run
terms_redliner.py --input deal_terms.json. Get ranked CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW findings with the counter-language and the approver who must sign each.
- Assemble the packet — Combine the three outputs into a deal-desk review packet. Always include the named approver chain. The packet is a recommendation, not an approval.
Scripts
| Script | Purpose | Industry profiles |
|---|
scripts/deal_scorer.py | 5-dimension scorecard with verdict + chain | saas, enterprise-software, services, marketplace |
scripts/discount_approval_router.py | Discount % → named approver chain + cycle days | saas, enterprise-software, services, marketplace |
scripts/terms_redliner.py | 10-pattern landmine scanner with counters | n/a (terms-driven) |
All three: stdlib-only, --help, --sample, --input <json>, --output {human,json}.
References
references/deal_desk_canon.md — Deal-desk operating practice: SaaStr playbooks (Jason Lemkin), Winning by Design (van der Kooij + Reichl), Forrester research, RevOps Co-op, OpenView benchmarks, Bridge Group AE comp, Salesforce Deal Desk best practices.
references/discount_economics.md — Discount math + LTV impact: David Skok (For Entrepreneurs), Bessemer State of the Cloud, Tomasz Tunguz, OpenView NRR research, Pacific Crest + KeyBanc SaaS surveys, Insight Partners revenue ops. Includes worked margin math (a 30% discount on an 80% gross-margin product loses 37.5% of margin, not 30%).
references/contract_landmines.md — 10+ named landmine patterns with example counter-language: YC startup library, Robert Klingberg (Founder's Guide to SaaS Agreements), Bowman + Brooke redline guides, IACCM/WorldCC commercial management research, Practical Law contracts library, Bradley Tusk on enterprise contracts, GC100 guidance.
Assumptions
- The skill assumes the commercial policy already exists (discount bands, payment-terms norms, indemnity caps). It applies the policy; it does not design it. See the
commercial-policy sibling skill for policy design.
- Industry profiles bake in customary thresholds. If your company has a documented discount matrix, pass it via
policy_thresholds in the input JSON to override.
- The terms redliner detects the 10 most common landmines. It is not a substitute for General Counsel review on the full contract.
- Scoring weights (margin 30%, risk 20%, strategic 15%, commercial 20%, term 15%) reflect a CFO-leaning bias. RevOps-led shops may want to reweight; the weights are constants at the top of
score_deal() and are easy to tune.
Anti-patterns
- Auto-approving deals. This skill never says "approved". Every verdict (including
APPROVE) names the human(s) who must sign. The output is a recommendation.
- Skipping the redline scan because the score is high. A high composite with
UNCAPPED_INDEMNITY is still a DECLINE — critical signals override composite.
- Using this for legal review of arbitrary contract text. This skill takes a structured terms JSON. For prose redlining, use
c-level-advisor/skills/general-counsel-advisor/scripts/contract_risk_scanner.py.
- Treating the discount router as a discount calculator. It routes a discount the AE/customer has already proposed; it does not calculate the right discount. Pricing logic lives in
commercial/skills/pricing-strategist.
- Routing every deal to CFO. The router stops at the lowest-authority hop that can sign the deal. Over-escalation slows the funnel and trains AEs to over-discount.
- Hand-editing the chain to skip a hop. Modifiers (enterprise floor, SMB fast-lane) are explicit; hidden skips defeat the audit trail.
Distinct from
| Sibling | Scope | Difference |
|---|
commercial/skills/pricing-strategist | Sets the pricing model (per-seat vs usage vs tiered, list prices, packaging) | Operates at the strategy layer — not per deal |
business-growth/contract-and-proposal-writer | Authors proposals, SOWs, MSAs | Output is a document; deal-desk is the gate before signing |
commercial/skills/commercial-policy (sibling) | Designs the discount matrix and approval thresholds | Deal-desk applies that policy to one deal at a time |
c-level-advisor/skills/general-counsel-advisor | Deep legal redline + term-sheet analysis | Operates on full contract prose; deal-desk uses structured terms JSON |
c-level-advisor/skills/cfo-advisor | Burn rate, unit economics, fundraising models | Strategic finance; deal-desk is one-deal granularity |
Quick examples
python3 scripts/deal_scorer.py --sample
python3 scripts/deal_scorer.py --input my_deal.json --profile enterprise-software
python3 scripts/discount_approval_router.py --sample
python3 scripts/discount_approval_router.py --input my_deal.json --profile saas
python3 scripts/terms_redliner.py --sample
python3 scripts/terms_redliner.py --input my_deal_terms.json --output json
The sample (a 28%-discount enterprise SaaS deal with uncapped indemnity + MFN) correctly DECLINEs at 55.4 / 100 composite and routes to AE → Deal Desk → VP Sales → CFO → CRO → General Counsel.
Forcing-question library (Matt Pocock grill discipline)
Walked one at a time by /cs:grill-commercial or the Commercial orchestrator. Recommended answer + canon citation per question. Never bundled.
-
"What's the gross margin at full discount, AND what does next quarter's pipeline look like at the same terms?"
Recommended: model both. Refuse to approve until the AE can articulate the precedent risk.
Canon: David Skok (For Entrepreneurs — discount math), Tomasz Tunguz benchmarks. Anti-pattern: one 40% precedent reshapes 3 quarters of pipeline.
-
"Is this discount inside or outside the standard discount matrix?"
Recommended: if outside, surface the policy exception explicitly and route to the named exception approver.
Canon: OpenView discount benchmarks, RevOps Co-op playbooks.
-
"What's the strategic value beyond ARR — logo, reference, expansion path?"
Recommended: require a named, verifiable expansion or reference commitment in writing.
Canon: SaaStr (Jason Lemkin) on logo discounts; Winning by Design on commitment language.
-
"Has the customer signed an indemnity cap, a liability cap, and a DPA (if EU data)?"
Recommended: required. Uncapped indemnity is a critical-signal override that blocks APPROVE regardless of margin.
Canon: WorldCC (formerly IACCM) commercial management research, GC100 contract guidance.
-
"What payment terms — NET-30, NET-45, or NET-60+?"
Recommended: prefer NET-30; NET-45+ is a cash flow drag worth quantifying.
Canon: KeyBanc SaaS Survey, Pacific Crest data — every 15 days of payment terms costs ~2% of effective deal value.
-
"Is the term multi-year with annual prepay, or annual auto-renew?"
Recommended: multi-year prepay > annual prepay > annual auto-renew. Auto-renew without 60-day notice is a redline.
Canon: Salesforce Deal Desk best practices, OpenView NRR studies.
-
"Who is the named human approver at each hop of the discount chain?"
Recommended: surface the name, not just the role. "VP Sales" is not an approver; "Maria Singh, VP Sales" is.
Canon: Bridge Group SaaS AE compensation research — named approval reduces precedent drift by 50%+.
Walk depth-first. Lock 1-4 before opening 5-7. After all 7 are answered, invoke deal_scorer.py → discount_approval_router.py → terms_redliner.py in sequence.