archik

name

archik

description

Use whenever .archik/main.archik.yaml or architecture.archik.yaml exists in the project, or the user asks about architecture, services, dependencies, or data flow. The YAML is the shared map between user and Claude. Interact with it ONLY through the `npx archik` CLI — `q` for queries, `schema` for shape, `suggest set` for proposals, `validate` after every change. Never read, write, or edit archik files manually.

Archik — the project's shared map

Mental model (read this first)

• The YAML is the source of truth. .archik/main.archik.yaml (and any *.archik.yaml sub-files) describe the system the user is building. The browser canvas is just a stateless projection of that file.
• The CLI is your only interface to it. You never read, write, or edit archik files directly. Every read goes through npx archik q ...; every write goes through npx archik suggest set → user accepts via /archik:accept.
• Two command surfaces: the user types /archik:* slash commands; you run npx archik ... directly. They're not interchangeable — see the tables below.
• Actors first, one use case to ship. When a user hands you a brief on a fresh project, the right opening move is model the actors, then propose the first use case to ship — never "let me sketch your whole system." Actors-first because you can't validate a use case without knowing who initiates it. Pick exactly one because forcing priorities into the open before any code lands is the entire point of the loop. "To ship" because the use case names its test paths from message one — slices start status: proposed (the tests don't exist on disk yet) and flip to status: active automatically when the tests land in BUILD. The project's commitments live in the YAML, not in the chat log.

Command surfaces

The user types these (slash commands)

These are the user's entry points. They're triggered by the user typing /archik:<name> in chat. When you see one, it's the user's authorisation to run the corresponding workflow now — skip the "want me to update the YAML?" question.

Slash command	What the user is asking for
/archik:bootstrap	Start here on a new project. Detect state (fresh / has-code / already-modelled) and route to the right next action — ask for a brief, suggest /archik:spawn, or surface trace status.
/archik:spawn	Mirror the source tree as a first-pass diagram (descriptive)
/archik:evolve	Propose a cleaner bounded-context refactor (prescriptive)
/archik:suggest <…>	Apply one feature-sized change from a description (targeted)
/archik:describe <id>	Explain a node and its connections
/archik:dev	Open the live canvas
/archik:accept	Apply the pending sidecar suggestion
/archik:reject	Discard the pending sidecar suggestion
/archik:actor <id>	Add or update an actor in the actor index (direct-write)
/archik:usecase <name>	Author a use case — flows + slices + tests (direct-write)
/archik:trace	Coverage matrix + concrete next action
/archik:alpha [show | promote]	Read or move project alphas with a machine-checked criteria

The full protocol for each lives at commands/<name>.md in the repo (or .claude/commands/archik/<name>.md once installed in a project). Follow it when invoked.

You run these (npx archik CLI)

These are the verbs you reach for during the loop. Default to npx archik (no global install needed).

Need	Command
Get the document schema	npx archik schema
Inspect the current diagram	npx archik q list | edges | stats
Look up one node	npx archik q describe <id>
Find dependencies / impact	npx archik q deps | dependents | impact <id>
List use cases (filter by actor)	npx archik q usecases [--actor <id>]
Describe one use case	npx archik q describe-usecase <id>
List actors	npx archik q actors
Use case coverage matrix	npx archik trace [--json] [--fail-on partial|none]
Alpha state snapshot	npx archik alpha show [--json]
Promote / demote an alpha state	npx archik alpha promote|demote <alpha> <state>
Validate a file	npx archik validate <path>
Stage a proposed change	npx archik suggest set --note '…' - <<'YAML' … YAML
Show / accept / reject pending	npx archik suggest show | accept | reject
Render an SVG	npx archik render --out diagram.svg
Diff two files	npx archik diff a.yaml b.yaml
Detect drift vs source tree	npx archik drift
Open the live canvas (foreground)	npx archik dev
Open the canvas (detached)	npx archik start / stop / status
Per-command help	npx archik <cmd> --help

Hard rule: the CLI is the only interface to archik files

You MUST NOT use Read, Write, or Edit against any file under .archik/, any *.archik.yaml, any sidecar (*.archik.suggested.yaml), or architecture.archik.yaml. The CLI owns reads, writes, validation, schema, and lifecycle.

If npx archik is unreachable (offline, sandboxed, missing), STOP and tell the user. Do NOT fall back to reading or editing YAML by hand.

Exception: four file types have no sidecar workflow — create or edit them directly with Write / Edit, then validate via npx archik validate:

• *.archik.seq.yaml — sequence diagrams (see "Sequence diagrams" below)
• *.archik.actors.yaml — actor definitions (see "Actors" below)
• *.archik.uc.yaml — use cases (see "Use cases and slices" below)
• *.archik.alphas.yaml — Essence alpha snapshot (see "Alpha state" below)

The engineering loop (how archik fits into delivering work)

Every structural change runs the loop. Don't skip phases; don't silently retry on rejection; don't paper over a wrong design mid-build — go back.

  ┌────────────┐  q stats / list / source tree.
  │  DISCOVER  │  Read before write. Map intent onto what already
  └─────┬──────┘  exists.
        │
  ┌─────▼──────┐  Frame intent in one line + 1–3 sharp clarifying Qs.
  │   DESIGN   │  Stage sidecar (`suggest set`) with rationale:
  │            │  bounded contexts, sync vs async, composition,
  └─────┬──────┘  alternatives rejected.       ◄── reject + reason ──┐
        │                                                            │
  ┌─────▼──────┐  Canvas diff: accept | reject (why?) | revise.      │
  │   DECIDE   │ ───────────────────────────────────────────────────►┤
  └─────┬──────┘                                                     │
        │ accept                                                     │
  ┌─────▼──────┐  Plan → Implement → Self-review.                    │
  │   BUILD    │  Small reversible commits, one delta each.          │
  │            │  Tests-first when behaviour is clear.               │
  │            │  If implementation invalidates the design ─────────►┘
  └─────┬──────┘  loop back to DESIGN — don't paper over.
        │
  ┌─────▼──────┐  npx archik validate; tests; drift; regen SVG.
  │   VERIFY   │  Evidence before assertions. Propose next iteration —
  └────────────┘  don't end on "done".

Phase	Driver	Tool you reach for
Discover	Claude	npx archik q ... + q usecases + q actors + ls
Design	Claude → User	actors / uc files (direct-write) + sidecar via suggest set
Decide	User	/archik:accept or /archik:reject (HITL gate)
Build	Claude → User	numbered plan (HITL approval), then small commits
Verify	Claude	npx archik validate + archik trace + tests + drift + SVG regen

Two non-obvious feedback edges:

1. Decide → Design on reject. A rejection is information; ask one specific question (boundary? relationship? scope? naming? composition? lifecycle?), treat the answer as a hard constraint, re-stage. Never silently retry the same draft.
2. Build → Design on invalidation. If implementation reveals the accepted diagram is wrong (a missing port, hidden dependency, boundary that doesn't hold), STOP coding. Open a fresh /archik:suggest to fix the diagram first, then resume.

Worked examples

1. Answer a question about the architecture

User asks "what writes to the orders DB?":

npx archik q dependents orders-db --rel writes

Other common queries:

npx archik q describe orders-api           # node detail + edges
npx archik q deps orders-api               # what does this node depend on?
npx archik q impact payments-db            # what would break if this is removed?
npx archik q list --kind service           # all services
npx archik q list --kind queue             # all queues
npx archik q stats                         # node + edge counts, kind histogram

If q returns empty for an id, the YAML doesn't have it — say so and offer to add it via /archik:suggest.

2. Stage a sidecar suggestion (the standard write path)

When work introduces, removes, or rewires components, you propose a sidecar. The user reviews on the canvas and accepts/rejects.

# Step A — get the schema (always start here when authoring)
npx archik schema

# Step B — pipe the FULL proposed end-state (every node, every edge —
# not a delta) straight into `suggest set` via heredoc. No temp files.
npx archik suggest set --note "add payments worker" - <<'YAML'
version: "1.0"
name: My Architecture
nodes:
  - id: orders-api
    kind: service
    name: Orders API
    description: Owns order placement and status — accepts cart payloads, validates inventory, writes to orders, emits order.placed.
    sourcePath: services/orders/api
  - id: order-events
    kind: stream
    name: order-events
    description: Stream of domain events emitted by orders-api (placed, cancelled, fulfilled).
  - id: payments-worker
    kind: worker
    name: Payments worker
    description: Subscribes to order.placed, charges via Stripe, writes payment records.
    sourcePath: services/payments/worker
edges:
  - id: orders-emits
    from: orders-api
    to: order-events
    relationship: publishes
  - id: payments-subscribes
    from: payments-worker
    to: order-events
    relationship: subscribes
YAML

The CLI parses, schema-validates, checks cross-file references, stamps metadata.suggestion, and atomically writes the sidecar. If it exits non-zero, the error includes a hint pointing at the wrong field — fix the heredoc and re-run. Never edit the sidecar by hand.

# Step C — surface the canvas URL so the user can review the diff overlay
# (added/removed/changed get green/red/amber frames).
# Or terminal: `npx archik suggest show | accept | reject`.

3. Verify before declaring done

npx archik validate .archik/main.archik.yaml   # schema + cross-file checks
npx archik drift                                # diagram vs source tree
npx archik render --out docs/architecture.svg  # if the project commits an SVG

4. Sub-architecture (a brand-new archikFile)

If a node needs its own diagram, author both the parent change AND the new sub-file. Order matters — the parent's archikFile: pointer is validated against on-disk existence:

# 1. Stage + accept the new sub-file (orphan, parent doesn't exist yet)
npx archik suggest set --main .archik/payments.archik.yaml \
                       --allow-orphan \
                       --note "spawn: payments internals" - <<'YAML'
version: "1.0"
name: Payments internals
nodes: [ ... ]
edges: [ ... ]
YAML
npx archik suggest accept .archik/payments.archik.yaml

# 2. Now the file is real on disk; stage the parent change
npx archik suggest set --note "link payments sub-architecture" - <<'YAML'
version: "1.0"
name: My Architecture
nodes:
  - id: payments
    ...
    archikFile: .archik/payments.archik.yaml
  ... (every other node)
edges:
  ... (every edge)
YAML

When you auto-accept the sub-file, narrate the rationale so the user can tell you're not bypassing their /archik:accept review on the main draft. The main draft is always left as a sidecar.

5. Sequence diagrams (direct-write, no sidecar)

Sequence diagrams live in .archik/ as *.archik.seq.yaml files and document a specific runtime flow at the call level. They are the only archik file mode you write directly.

# 1. Write the seq file directly with the Write tool
# 2. Validate (this also checks every seqFiles reference)
npx archik validate .archik/main.archik.yaml

# 3. Link it from an architecture node via `suggest set` (sidecar workflow)
npx archik suggest set --note "link login-flow seq diagram to api-gateway" - <<'YAML'
version: "1.0"
name: My Architecture
nodes:
  - id: api-gateway
    ...
    seqFiles:
      - .archik/login-flow.archik.seq.yaml
  ... (every other node)
edges: [ ... ]
YAML

# 4. Render to SVG (optional, useful for CI / docs)
npx archik render --seq .archik/login-flow.archik.seq.yaml --out login-flow.svg

seqFiles is a non-empty array of relative paths from project root. The validator checks each path exists.

The seq schema (UML subset) is documented at the bottom of this file under "Sequence diagram schema reference".

File modes — two modes, picked by filename

Suffix	Mode	When to use
*.archik.yaml	normal	The canonical architecture of code that exists.
*.archik.suggested.yaml	suggested	A pending change to a normal file. Owned by suggest set. Becomes normal on accept.
*.archik.seq.yaml	sequence	A runtime flow diagram. Direct-write. No sidecar.
*.archik.actors.yaml	actors	Who acts on the system (human / external-system / time / device). Direct-write.
*.archik.uc.yaml	use case	One use case: flows + slices + test paths. Lives under .archik/usecases/. Direct-write.
*.archik.alphas.yaml	alphas	Project-wide Essence alpha state snapshot. Direct-write.

There is no separate "discussion" file mode. Greenfield / exploratory work is expressed via status: proposed on the affected nodes and edges (see Lifecycle below). The diagram stays canonical.

Required fields and validation rules

These rules are enforced by the validator. Pre-empt them when authoring.

Every node needs a description

Empty strings rejected, missing values rejected. Explain what the node does — its responsibility, the work it performs, why it exists — not just its kind or name.

Bad: "A service." "The orders module." Good: "Owns order placement and status — accepts cart payloads, validates inventory, writes to orders and emits order.placed to the stream."

Code-bearing kinds need a sourcePath

These kinds MUST declare a sourcePath that exists on disk: service, function, worker, module, page, component, store, hook.

Other kinds are exempt: external, cloud, prompt, llm, route, interface, adapter, port, database, cache, queue, topic, stream, gateway, cdn, agent, frontend, vectordb, storage, auth, observability, tool, custom.

If suggest set rejects with a sourcePath error, you have three options:

1. Fix the path to point at real code (verify with ls first).
2. Use a non-code-bearing kind (e.g. external for a third-party service).
3. Mark the node status: proposed if it's planned-but-not-built (see Lifecycle).

Never paste a path you haven't seen on disk. The validator rejects fabricated paths so hallucinated nodes can't slip into the canonical architecture.

Lifecycle status — proposed, active, deprecated

Both nodes and edges carry an optional status. Same enum, same defaults, same visual treatment.

status	When	sourcePath rule (nodes)	Visual
absent / active	Built and live (default).	Required for code-bearing kinds; must exist on disk.	Standard solid stroke.
proposed	Planned for next iteration — belongs in the canonical map but isn't built yet.	Optional; if supplied, must exist on disk.	Dashed indigo border, reduced opacity.
deprecated	Being phased out; new work shouldn't depend on it.	Optional; same on-disk rule as proposed.	Dashed amber border + strikethrough on the name.

For edges, status: proposed expresses "this dependency is planned" (e.g. "orders-api will start subscribing to payments.completed next sprint"). archik drift and the validator both respect lifecycle so proposed nodes don't trigger missing-source warnings before they're built.

Node stereotype — ECB classification

Nodes that participate in a use case flow may carry an optional stereotype field:

stereotype: boundary   # accepts requests from actors / external systems
stereotype: control    # orchestrates; implements the use case logic
stereotype: entity     # stores data; domain model

The validator enforces the ECB transition rules on seq diagrams that carry a realizes block: actors call boundaries, boundaries call controls, controls call entities or other controls. Direct actor→entity or entity→boundary messages are errors. Untagged nodes are silently skipped so adoption is incremental.

Other rules worth pre-empting

• No duplicate edges by (from, to, relationship). The validator rejects the second occurrence and points at the first by id. If you genuinely need two concerns between the same pair (e.g. service → db for both reads and writes), use distinct relationships.
• Parent / child sourcePath containment. When a parent and a child both declare sourcePath and the parent's path is a directory, the child's path MUST be inside the parent's. module: src/orders → function: src/orders/api.ts is fine; module: src/orders → function: src/payments/api.ts is rejected.
• No coordinates (x, y, width, height, viewport). Layout is computed by ELK on every render. The schema rejects them.
• No empty arrays. notes, responsibilities, interfaces — either include real entries or omit the field.
• Renaming an id is forbidden. Remove the old node and add a new one. Renames break diff and require manual re-link in code.
• Don't drop user-authored fields. description, responsibilities, notes carried forward must stay intact.

Design heuristics — apply these in DESIGN

Run a candidate through this checklist before staging a sidecar. Each item is a yellow flag — flag them in your rationale rather than hiding them.

• One reason to change. Each new node has a single responsibility expressible in one sentence. If description rambles, decompose.
• Bounded contexts. Name the context this change belongs to. A change spanning two contexts usually means a missing third (orchestrator, port, gateway).
• Async at context boundaries. Default cross-context coupling to publishes / subscribes over a stream/queue. http_call across contexts is allowed but should be justified (sync-required RPC, query for read-side data).
• Composition over sprawl. Group related nodes under a module parent via parentId. Flat top-level lists past ~8 nodes are a smell.
• Ports & adapters at the edge. External integrations sit behind an external node, never inline in a service. Port (interface) + adapter (concrete) is preferred when the integration could swap.
• Public traffic → gateway/auth upstream. Anything user-facing routes through a gateway/auth node, not directly to a service.
• Failure modes. Async producers imply DLQ/retry on the consumer; http_call implies timeout + circuit. Don't draw the happy path alone.
• Use case participation → ECB classification. If a node appears in any active use case slice (check npx archik q usecases or trace output), it needs a stereotype: boundary | control | entity before the seq diagram is authored. An unclassified node in a realizes-linked seq passes structurally but defeats ECB rule enforcement. Classify now; the validator will catch violations at seq-authoring time, not at code-review time.
• Lifecycle honesty. Code-bearing node without code on disk → status: proposed. About to be removed → status: deprecated.

When to propose, when to defer

Propose a sidecar (don't silently apply) when work changes shape:

• New service, function, worker, frontend, queue, DB, etc.
• New dependency between existing components.
• New external API integration.
• Removing or renaming a component.
• Splitting one component into several, or merging several into one.

Frame it as: "This adds a payments-worker reading from the order-events queue. Want me to stage that as an archik suggestion?" — wait for confirmation or for the user to type /archik:suggest.

Leave the diagram alone for:

• Pure refactors that don't change the component graph.
• Local file moves / renames.
• Bug fixes inside an existing node.

The diagram tracks shape, not implementation detail.

Follow-ups (do this after every accept / reject)

After a suggestion is accepted, the diagram has changed. Don't just stop — propose what's natural next. Pick whichever fits:

1. Implement the change. If the suggestion added a new node (e.g. a worker, a queue), the code doesn't exist yet. Offer to scaffold it: "The diagram now shows payments-worker subscribing to order-events. Want me to scaffold src/workers/payments/ with a stub consumer?"
2. Improve. If the change exposed bigger architectural smells (a god service, a missing port/adapter pair, a leaky boundary), suggest /archik:evolve: "Worth running /archik:evolve on the orders module? It's now wired to four downstream services and might want a clearer port."
3. Diff vs reality. Offer to spot-check the source tree against the new diagram: npx archik drift.
4. Render. If the project commits a rendered SVG (docs/architecture.svg), regenerate it: npx archik render --out docs/architecture.svg.

After a rejection, never go silent and never silently retry the same draft. Ask a question pinned to one of these axes — the answer becomes a constraint when you regenerate:

• Boundary — "Did the wrong context own a node? Should payments-worker live under orders or billing?"
• Relationship — "Was a sync http_call wrong where you wanted publishes / subscribes?"
• Scope — "Too big? Want me to try a smaller delta that only touches the queue, not the worker?"
• Naming — "Was the id/name unclear? What would you call it?"
• Composition — "Should this be one node, or split into a port + adapter pair?"
• Lifecycle — "Should this be status: proposed for now and flipped to active once the code lands?"

Then loop back to DESIGN with the rejection reason as a hard constraint.

Optional sharpening — superpowers:* skills (if installed)

The loop is self-contained, but these sharpen specific phases when the user has them. Check the available-skills list at session start; never assume they exist.

Phase	Skill
Design	superpowers:brainstorming
Build	superpowers:writing-plans,
	superpowers:test-driven-development,
	superpowers:requesting-code-review
Verify	superpowers:verification-before-completion

Actors

Actors live in .archik/actors.archik.actors.yaml (one file per project). Direct-write — no sidecar. Schema: npx archik schema actors.

version: "1.0"
actors:
  - id: customer
    kind: human              # human | external-system | time | device
    description: End-user buying products.
    goals: [place-orders, view-history]   # optional free text
  - id: payments-gw
    kind: external-system
    description: Stripe — charges cards and issues refunds.

Use cases reference actors by id. The validator rejects a use case whose primaryActor isn't in the actor index.

Use cases and slices

One file per use case under .archik/usecases/<id>.archik.uc.yaml. Direct-write — no sidecar. Schema: npx archik schema uc.

version: "1.0"
id: place-order
kind: useCase
name: Place an order
status: active
primaryActor: customer
secondaryActors: [payments-gw]
goal: Customer pays for items in cart and receives confirmation.
flows:
  basic:
    steps:
      - Customer submits cart.
      - System reserves inventory.
      - System charges payment method.
      - System persists order and emits OrderPlaced.
  alternates:
    - id: payment-declined
      branchFrom: basic.3
      steps: [Payment gateway returns decline, System releases inventory.]
slices:
  - id: happy-path
    description: Full successful purchase.
    flows: [basic]
    tests: [tests/e2e/place-order.happy.spec.ts]   # must exist on disk for active slices
    realization:
      seqFile: .archik/place-order.happy.archik.seq.yaml
  - id: declined
    description: Payment gateway declines.
    flows: [basic, payment-declined]
    tests: [tests/e2e/place-order.declined.spec.ts]

Validation rules:

• primaryActor and secondaryActors must resolve in the actor index.
• Active slice tests paths must exist on disk (same discipline as sourcePath).
• If realization.seqFile is set, the named seq file must exist AND carry a matching realizes block (bidirectional).
• flows.basic is required; alternates[].branchFrom must reference an existing flow + step number.

Query: npx archik q usecases [--actor <id>] | npx archik q describe-usecase <id>

Alpha state

One file per project: <name>.archik.alphas.yaml. Direct-write. Tracks four Essence alphas that archik can directly evidence: stakeholders, requirements, softwareSystem, work.

version: "1.0"
alphas:
  stakeholders:
    state: represented     # conceived | recognised | represented | involved | in-agreement | satisfied
    evidence: ["developer (human) + claude (external-system) in actors file"]
  requirements:
    state: acceptable      # conceived | bounded | coherent | acceptable | addressed | fulfilled
    note: "All active slices test-backed; rejected slice still needs a realization seq."
  softwareSystem:
    state: usable          # architecture-selected | demonstrable | usable | ready | operational | retired
  work:
    state: under-control   # initiated | prepared | started | under-control | concluded | closed

Manage states with:

npx archik alpha show                              # verification badges: ✓ verified | ✗ over-claimed | ? subjective
npx archik alpha promote requirements addressed    # runs machine check before writing
npx archik alpha demote softwareSystem usable      # no check on demote

The validator checks machine-checkable states (e.g. requirements.acceptable requires every active slice to have on-disk tests). Over-claimed states are flagged ✗ — downgrade or fix the artifacts.

Sequence diagram schema reference

version: "1.0"          # required, literal
name: "Login flow"      # required, non-empty
description: "..."      # optional

realizes:               # optional — links this seq to a use case slice
  useCase: place-order  # use case id (must exist in .archik/usecases/)
  slice: happy-path     # slice id within that use case
                        # validator enforces bidirectional integrity:
                        # the slice's realization.seqFile must name THIS file

participants:           # required, at least one
  - id: browser         # participant ref id (used in steps)
    nodeId: frontend    # architecture node id this participant maps to
                        # node's kind drives the participant header icon/color
    label: Browser      # optional display label (defaults to nodeId)
    status: proposed    # optional — proposed | active | deprecated

steps:                  # ordered list of messages, notes, groups
  # --- message ---
  - type: message
    id: m1
    from: browser       # participant id
    to: api             # participant id
    label: POST /login
    arrow: sync         # sync | async | return | create | destroy
    activate: true      # optional — draws activation box on receiver
    status: proposed    # optional

  # --- note ---
  - type: note
    id: n1
    position: over      # over | left_of | right_of
    participants: [api] # list of participant ids the note spans
    text: "JWT issued here"
    status: proposed    # optional

  # --- group (alt / opt / loop / par / break / ref) ---
  - type: group
    id: g1
    kind: alt
    condition: "[authenticated]"   # optional — shown in group header
    branches:
      - label: "[success]"         # optional branch label
        steps:
          - type: message
            id: m2
            from: api
            to: browser
            label: "200 OK"
            arrow: return
      - label: "[failure]"
        steps:
          - type: message
            id: m3
            from: api
            to: browser
            label: "401 Unauthorized"
            arrow: return
    status: proposed               # optional

  # --- ref group (drill-down to another seq file) ---
  - type: group
    id: g2
    kind: ref
    label: "checkout flow"
    seqFile: .archik/checkout-flow.archik.seq.yaml
                                   # makes the frame clickable in the UI
    branches: []                   # required (can be empty for ref)

Arrow types:

arrow	meaning
sync	synchronous call (solid line, filled arrowhead)
async	fire-and-forget (solid line, open arrowhead)
return	return value (dashed line, open arrowhead)
create	object creation (dashed line, filled arrowhead + «create»)
destroy	object destruction (solid line, × marker at target)

Group kinds: alt (conditional), opt (optional), loop, par (parallel), break, ref (reference)

Validator checks for seq diagrams:

• All seq files referenced in seqFiles exist on disk.
• Each seq file parses as valid YAML and matches the seq schema.
• Participant nodeId fields reference real node ids from the architecture.
• No duplicate step ids within a seq file.

Full CLI reference

Run npx archik <cmd> --help for the per-command surface.

npx archik schema                       # the document shape (start here when authoring)
                  --json                #   structured shape for piping into jq
                  --seq                 #   seq diagram schema instead of arch schema
                  uc                    #   use case schema
                  actors                #   actors schema

npx archik q describe <id> | deps <id> | dependents <id>
                  list | edges | impact <id> | stats
                  sequences [--node <id>]   # list seq diagrams; --node filters to flows involving a node
                  usecases [--actor <id>]   # list use cases; filter by actor
                  describe-usecase <id>     # one use case in detail
                  actors                    # list actors
                  --json                #   stable machine-readable shape

npx archik trace [--json]               # coverage matrix: use case × slice × test × seq × ECB
                  --use-case <id>       #   filter to one use case
                  --actor <id>          #   filter by actor
                  --status active|proposed|deprecated
                  --coverage full|partial|none
                  --fail-on partial|none    # exit 1 for CI gates

npx archik alpha show [--json]          # alpha state snapshot with verification badges
              alpha promote <alpha> <state> [--note <text>]   # runs machine check first
              alpha demote <alpha> <state>

npx archik validate <path> [--json]     # schema + cross-file check (CI-friendly)
npx archik render --out diagram.svg --theme light|dark
              render --seq <path> --out seq.svg --theme light|dark
npx archik diff a.yaml b.yaml [--out diff.svg] [--json]
npx archik drift [--json] [--ignore <file>]   # diagram vs source tree

npx archik suggest show [--json]
              suggest set <draft|->     # validate + stage a sidecar
                  --note '<text>'       # set metadata.suggestion.note
                  --main <path>         # override main file detection
                  --allow-orphan        # permit a sidecar with no main on disk
                  --json                # structured output
              suggest accept | reject

npx archik dev | start | stop | status  # canvas server lifecycle
npx archik watch                        # re-render to SVG on save
npx archik init                         # scaffold + install skill + slash commands
npx archik skill | commands             # refresh the skill / slash commands

Things to avoid

• Don't cat, Read, Write, or Edit archik architecture files (.archik/, *.archik.yaml, sidecars). The CLI owns them.
• Don't author drafts from memory; run npx archik schema first.
• Don't add coordinates (x, y, width, height, viewport).
• Don't add empty notes / responsibilities / interfaces — either include real entries or omit the field.
• Don't blow away user-authored fields when carrying a node forward.
• Don't bulk-restructure as a side effect of a small edit. Make the minimal change that captures what changed.
• Don't silently retry a rejected draft. Ask one specific question, treat the answer as a hard constraint, then re-stage.
• Don't end on "done" after accept. Propose the natural next step (implement, evolve, drift-check, render).