// Use when designing or writing heterogeneity analysis for an Economic-Research manuscript. Enforces five-dimension priority and theoretical-justification discipline.
Use when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for an Economic-Research manuscript — quasi-experimental designs (DID, IV, RDD, DML, event study). Stress-tests the design before drafting tables.
Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for an Economic-Research manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical theory references are missing.
Use when designing or writing mechanism analyses for an Economic-Research empirical manuscript. Mechanism tests are near-mandatory for empirical submissions.
Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of an Economic-Research manuscript. Frames implications at the significance / institutional level rather than the actionable / ministry level used by Management-World.
Use when responding to reviewer reports for an Economic-Research R&R. Produces the point-by-point response letter and aligned manuscript edits.
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for 《经济研究》 — format, word count, double-blind, references, anti-plagiarism, author info, and supplementary files.
| name | er-heterogeneity |
| description | Use when designing or writing heterogeneity analysis for an Economic-Research manuscript. Enforces five-dimension priority and theoretical-justification discipline. |
按《经济研究》读者期待度排序：
至少切 3 个维度，每个维度至少 2 个子样本对比。
本文进一步检验[维度]异质性。
理论上，[原因]……
实证上，本文将样本按[维度]分为[组 1] 和 [组 2]，分别估计主回归（结果见表 X 第 (1)(2) 列）。
结果显示，[组 1] 的处理效应为 X，而 [组 2] 为 Y，系数差异在 [显著水平] 上显著。
这一发现与本文的[机制]一致。
异质性 ≈ 机制的反向验证：
理想的实证文章应该：机制（M 强 → 效应强） 与 异质性（M 强样本 → 效应强） 互相印证。
【异质性维度】X 个
【系数差异检验】是 / 否
【与机制一致性】是 / 否
【最小子样本量】X
【下一步】er-tables-figures