| name | team-management |
| description | Hiring framework, contractor onboarding, 1:1 templates, performance reviews, delegation (RACI), capacity planning, communication protocols, and offboarding. Scales CC from solo to small team without losing operational quality. |
| tags | ["skill","team","management","hiring"] |
| triggers | ["team management","use team management","run team management","hiring framework"] |
Team Management ā Solo to Small Team Framework
Overview
This skill gives CC a repeatable system to hire, onboard, manage, and eventually offboard the right people ā contractors first, full-time later. Every template is designed to be run quickly (CC's time is scarce) and to extract high signal at every stage.
When to load this skill: When CC is hiring, delegating to a contractor, doing a 1:1, or reviewing someone's performance.
1. Hiring Framework
Role Definition Template
Before writing a job post, complete this. Every field is required.
ROLE DEFINITION
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
Role title:
Brand/team: (OASIS AI / PropFlow / Nostalgic / Cross-brand)
Weekly hours: (contract hours expected per week)
Duration: (Project-based / Ongoing / Trial 30 days)
Compensation range: ($X/hr or $X/month ā never negotiate from zero)
Core responsibilities (3-5, each one specific and measurable):
1.
2.
3.
Required skills (deal-breakers ā must have ALL of these):
-
-
Nice-to-haves (bonus signals, not filters):
-
-
NOT this role (what it explicitly isn't ā prevents misaligned applicants):
-
-
Success in 30 days looks like:
Success in 90 days looks like:
Reporting to: CC directly
Tools used: (list every tool they'll need access to)
Job Description Generator Structure
Use this structure when posting on Upwork, LinkedIn, or referrals:
[HOOK ā 1 sentence about why this role matters at this company]
[WHO WE ARE ā 2-3 sentences about OASIS/PropFlow/the brand]
[THE ROLE ā 3-4 sentences on what this person actually does day-to-day]
[WHAT YOU'LL DO ā 4-6 bullets from the core responsibilities]
[WHAT WE NEED ā 3-5 required skills as bullets]
[WHAT'S IN IT FOR YOU ā compensation, schedule, remote, growth opportunity]
[HOW TO APPLY ā specific instruction that filters lazy applicants
e.g., "Start your application with the phrase 'I read the brief' and tell me about a similar project you've done"]
The application filter is non-negotiable. Anyone who skips it is auto-rejected.
Interview Question Bank
For Virtual Assistants / Ops roles:
- "Walk me through a week where you were managing tasks for 3 different people simultaneously. How did you prioritize and what broke down?"
- "Tell me about a time you caught a mistake before it became a problem. What was the mistake and how did you spot it?"
- "I'll send you a task with incomplete instructions. What do you do before you start it?" (Tests: ask-first vs. assume-and-fail behavior)
- "What does your ideal working relationship with a client look like?" (Tests: communication style, autonomy preference)
- "What tools are you currently fastest in and what would take you a week to get comfortable with?"
For Developers:
- "Show me the last feature you shipped. Walk me through the decision you made that you'd make differently now."
- "I have a bug in production affecting 10% of users. What's your first three moves?" (Tests: triage instinct, communication)
- "Describe how you estimate task complexity. What do you factor in that most developers forget?"
- "You disagree with a technical decision I've made. How do you handle it?"
- "What's the biggest technical debt in a project you've owned and why did you let it accumulate?"
For Marketers / Content:
- "Give me an example of a piece of content you created that performed significantly better than expected. What drove it?"
- "What's a content idea you'd pitch for OASIS AI's LinkedIn this week? Walk me through your reasoning."
- "How do you decide what NOT to create? What's your filter for content that isn't worth the time?"
- "You post something and it gets no engagement. What's your process for diagnosing why?"
- "Describe your relationship with data. What metrics do you actually check and on what cadence?"
For Sales / SDRs:
- "Walk me through your cold outreach process step by step. What's your open rate and how do you know if it's good?"
- "A lead ghosts after a solid discovery call. What's your sequence over the next 21 days?"
- "What's the hardest objection you've heard and what's the most honest response you've found?"
- "Tell me about a deal you should have won but didn't. What would you do differently?"
- "What does your personal CRM look like? How do you track follow-ups?"
Universal closing questions (ask every candidate):
- "What do you know about this company/project that makes you think you'd be good here?"
- "What questions do you have for me?" (Weak candidates have none or ask about salary immediately)
- "If you took this role, what would you want to accomplish in the first 30 days?"
Scoring Rubric
Rate each dimension 1-5 after the interview. Weighted score below.
| Dimension | Weight | 1 (Bad) | 3 (Ok) | 5 (Strong) |
|---|
| Relevant experience | 30% | Minimal overlap with the actual work | Some overlap, needs coaching | Deep overlap, has done this exact thing |
| Communication clarity | 20% | Vague, needs repeated prompting | Adequate but not precise | Crisp answers, asks smart follow-ups |
| Ownership mindset | 20% | Waits to be told, passes blame | Moderate autonomy | Runs toward problems, owns outcomes |
| Speed/efficiency signals | 15% | No evidence of speed | Average pace | Fast, systematic, tools-first thinker |
| Culture/values fit | 15% | Doesn't read as authentic or hungry | Neutral | Clearly driven, aligns with CC's energy |
Minimum hiring bar: Weighted average ā„ 3.5. Never hire below 3.0.
Veto rule: A score of 1 on Ownership Mindset OR Communication Clarity is an automatic no regardless of total score.
Red Flags During Interviews
Stop the process if you see these:
- Can't give specific examples ā everything is "we did X" (not "I did X")
- Blames former employers in detail ā signals pattern, not isolated incident
- Hasn't researched the company at all ā signals low interest or high entitlement
- Negotiates aggressively before seeing the offer ā signals misaligned priorities
- Can't explain why they left their last role clearly ā often hiding performance issues
- Answers questions with questions to buy time repeatedly ā signals gaps they're masking
- Talks exclusively about what they want from the role, not what they'll deliver
Green Flags During Interviews
Strong signals to weight heavily:
- Mentions a specific problem they identified in your company before the interview
- Uses numbers and outcomes unprompted ("I reduced turnaround from 3 days to same-day")
- Asks about your challenges, not just the role's perks
- Admits what they don't know and explains how they'd close the gap
- Has a portfolio, work sample, or case study ready without being asked
- Pushes back on a weak assumption you make ā thoughtfully and respectfully
Reference Check Template
Ask three questions. These are the ones that actually reveal signal.
Reference Check ā [Candidate Name]
Speaking with: [Name, role, relationship to candidate]
1. "On a scale of 1-10, how strongly would you rehire [Name] if you had an open role they were suited for? What would need to be true for that number to be higher?"
(Forces honesty ā anything below 8 is a red flag. The "what would need to be true" part surfaces real weaknesses.)
2. "What type of manager brings out the best in [Name]? And what type of working environment is NOT a good fit?"
(Reveals how much management the person needs ā critical for a lean team where CC has limited bandwidth.)
3. "Is there anything about how [Name] operates that took you a while to figure out, that you wish someone had told you upfront?"
(Open-ended and non-threatening. Often surfaces the one real issue no one else asked about.)
2. Contractor Onboarding Protocol
Day 0: Legal and Payment
Day 1: Access Provisioning
Day 1: Context Download
Day 3: First Task Assignment
Day 7: First Deliverable Check-In
Day 14: First Performance Snapshot
Snapshot (internal, not shared unless issues):
- Deliverable quality: 1-5
- Communication quality: 1-5
- Speed vs. expectations: 1-5
- Proactiveness (flags issues before they escalate): 1-5
- Overall: continue / adjust / end
Day 30: Full Review
Formal conversation:
- Review deliverables produced vs. committed deliverables
- Performance snapshot scores across the month
- Feedback exchange: CC gives feedback, then asks "What's one thing I could do better as a client?"
- Decision: Continue at same terms / Adjust scope or rate / End engagement
- If continuing: set next 30-day goals explicitly
3. 1:1 Framework
Weekly 1:1 Template (15-30 min)
Run this every week with any contractor working >10 hrs/week. Keep notes.
WEEKLY 1:1 ā [Name] ā [Date]
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
1. How are you doing? (Genuine check-in ā not just work)
Notes:
2. What went well this week?
Notes:
3. What's blocked or frustrating?
Notes:
Action items:
4. Priorities for next week (agree on top 3 together)
1.
2.
3.
5. Anything you need from me? (Resources, decisions, unblocking)
Notes:
Duration: ___ Format: Slack huddle / Loom / Zoom
Rule: CC speaks <40% of the time in a 1:1. This is for the contractor to talk.
Monthly 1:1 Template (45-60 min)
Run once per month in addition to weeklies. More strategic.
MONTHLY 1:1 ā [Name] ā [Date]
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
1. Career growth discussion
"Where do you want to be in 12 months? Is this engagement helping you get there?"
Notes:
2. Skill development opportunities
"Is there anything you want to learn that we could incorporate into the work?"
Notes:
3. Process improvements
"What's one thing about how we work together that, if we fixed it, would make your work 20% better?"
Notes:
Action items:
4. Compensation and role alignment (if applicable)
Review: market rates, performance, scope changes
Decision: maintain / increase / renegotiate
Notes:
Follow-up actions (with deadlines):
4. Performance Review Framework
Quarterly Review Template
Run this every 90 days for any contractor working >15 hrs/week.
QUARTERLY REVIEW ā [Name] ā [Quarter: Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4 YYYY]
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
Role:
Review period:
GOALS ACHIEVED
Goal 1: [stated goal] ā [outcome with evidence]
Goal 2: [stated goal] ā [outcome with evidence]
Goal 3: [stated goal] ā [outcome with evidence]
Overall goal achievement: X/3 goals fully met
AREAS OF STRENGTH (be specific ā name actual deliverables)
-
-
AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT (specific and actionable ā not vague)
Improvement area:
Why it matters:
Specific action to take:
By when:
GOALS FOR NEXT QUARTER
1. [Specific, measurable goal with deadline]
2.
3.
COMPENSATION REVIEW
Current rate: $X
Market check: [comparable rate range]
Performance rating: [1-5 ā see scale below]
Recommendation: Maintain / Increase by X% / Renegotiate scope
New rate (if changed): $X effective [date]
OVERALL RATING: ___/5
Rating Scale:
- 5 ā Exceeds: consistently delivers beyond scope, proactively improves processes
- 4 ā Meets+: meets all goals and frequently goes beyond on quality or speed
- 3 ā Meets: delivers what was agreed, rarely more, rarely less
- 2 ā Below: missing goals or quality issues requiring repeated correction
- 1 ā Critical: performance gap threatening project outcomes; PIP required or end engagement
Rule: A 1 rating requires immediate intervention, not a quarterly review. Address within the week it's identified.
5. Delegation Framework (RACI-Based)
RACI Definitions
- R ā Responsible: Does the actual work
- A ā Accountable: Owns the outcome; the one CC asks "did it happen?"
- C ā Consulted: Input needed before decision is finalized
- I ā Informed: Kept in the loop but not required for decision
Task Delegation Template
TASK DELEGATION BRIEF
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
Task name:
Project/context:
Deadline: (hard deadline vs. soft target)
WHAT: (specific deliverable ā what does done look like in 1 sentence?)
WHY: (why this task matters ā context that changes how they approach it)
WHO (RACI):
Responsible: [name]
Accountable: [almost always CC for now]
Consulted: [who they need to check with, if anyone]
Informed: [who gets notified when done]
HOW (success criteria):
- [Measurable criterion 1]
- [Measurable criterion 2]
- [Format/channel for delivery]
RESOURCES AVAILABLE:
- [Relevant doc, template, or credential they'll need]
- [Example of a similar completed task for reference]
CONSTRAINTS:
- [Budget limit if applicable]
- [Tools they must or must not use]
- [Anything that's out of scope for this task]
CHECK-IN POINT: [Midpoint check before final delivery, if task is >2 days]
Rule: Never delegate a task without completing this brief. "Figure it out" is not a success criterion.
6. Team Capacity Planning
Capacity Snapshot Template
CAPACITY SNAPSHOT ā [Week of DATE]
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
Name | Role | Hrs/week | Projects | Utilization
[Contractor] | [VA/Dev/etc] | 15 | [Project A, B] | 85%
[Contractor] | [...] | 20 | [Project C] | 70%
Total capacity: X hrs/week
Total allocated: Y hrs/week
Overall utilization: Z%
Utilization Targets
| Work Type | Target Utilization | Why |
|---|
| Creative / strategic work | 70-80% | Creative output needs slack; over-utilization kills quality |
| Execution / ops work | 80-90% | Predictable tasks can run tighter |
| Any role | >90% for 4+ consecutive weeks | Hire signal ā add headcount or reduce scope |
When to Hire Next
Hire indicator is met when ANY of these are true for 4+ consecutive weeks:
- Your own utilization (CC's hours on delegatable work) is >90%
- A contractor's utilization is >90% and the work is still growing
- A critical skill is routinely absent (e.g., no one owns design and it's blocking launches)
- Client onboarding speed is limited by team capacity, not sales pipeline
CC's non-delegable hours (never hire to replace these):
- Sales calls and client relationship decisions
- Strategic decisions (pricing, partnerships, pivots)
- Content creation (personal brand requires CC's voice)
- Final approval on anything that ships to a client or the public
7. Communication Protocols
Channel Routing
| Type of Message | Channel | Expected Response |
|---|
| Urgent blocker (>2hr impact) | Phone call or voice message | Within 1 hour |
| Task question or decision needed | Slack DM | Within 4 business hours |
| Status update or FYI | Slack DM or project tool | No response required |
| Formal feedback or review | Email or written doc | Within 24 hours |
| Billing / contracts | Email only | Within 48 hours |
Async-first rule: Default to async. Call only when a back-and-forth would take >5 messages to resolve.
Status Update Format
When a contractor gives CC a status update (request this weekly at minimum):
STATUS ā [Name] ā [Date]
ā
DONE: [What was completed this week ā 2-4 items]
š DOING: [What's in progress right now]
š« BLOCKED: [Anything that's stuck and what it's waiting on]
š
NEXT: [Top priority for next 3-5 days]
Meeting Cadence
| Meeting | Frequency | Duration | Participants |
|---|
| Async status update | Weekly (Thursday) | Written | All contractors |
| 1:1 check-in | Weekly (for >10 hrs/wk contractors) | 15-30 min | CC + individual |
| Monthly deep 1:1 | Monthly | 45-60 min | CC + individual |
| Quarterly review | Every 90 days | 60 min | CC + individual |
| Team sync (when team > 2) | Bi-weekly | 30 min | All |
8. Offboarding Protocol
Knowledge Transfer Checklist
Before last day, contractor must complete:
Access Revocation Checklist
Revoke on or before last day:
Final Deliverables Handoff
OFFBOARDING HANDOFF ā [Name] ā [Date]
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
Projects handed off:
- [Project]: [handoff doc or Loom link]
Work in progress at time of exit:
- [Item]: [status + next step + location]
Open items still needing resolution:
- [Item]: [owner going forward]
Outstanding payments:
Final invoice received: Y/N
Invoice amount: $
Payment due: [date]
Notes for future reference (would we rehire?):
Exit Interview Questions
Ask these on the final call (5-10 min max):
- "What was the most valuable thing you worked on here?"
- "What was the most frustrating part of working with us? What could we do better?"
- "Is there anyone in your network who might be a great fit for the work you did?"
Integration Points
- Hiring decisions ā log to
memory/DECISIONS.md
- Performance issues ā log to
memory/MISTAKES.md with root cause and prevention
- Onboarding tasks ā add to
memory/ACTIVE_TASKS.md
- New team member ā trigger workflow
.agents/workflows/onboard-team-member.md
- Capacity data ā update
brain/STATE.md (team section)
Obsidian Links
- [[brain/USER]] | [[brain/STATE]] | [[memory/ACTIVE_TASKS]] | [[brain/CAPABILITIES]]
- [[skills/ceo-dashboard/SKILL]] | [[skills/project-management/SKILL]]
/onboard-team-member