with one click
repomix
// [AI & Tools] Use when you need to package code repositories into single AI-friendly files using Repomix with customizable patterns and multiple output formats.
// [AI & Tools] Use when you need to package code repositories into single AI-friendly files using Repomix with customizable patterns and multiple output formats.
[HINT] Download the complete skill directory including SKILL.md and all related files
| name | repomix |
| description | [AI & Tools] Use when you need to package code repositories into single AI-friendly files using Repomix with customizable patterns and multiple output formats. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Codex compatibility note:
- Invoke repository skills with
$skill-namein Codex; this mirrored copy rewrites legacy Claude/skill-namereferences.- Prefer the
plan-hardskill for planning guidance in this Codex mirror.- Task tracker mandate: BEFORE executing any workflow or skill step, create/update task tracking for all steps and keep it synchronized as progress changes.
- User-question prompts mean to ask the user directly in Codex.
- Ignore Claude-specific mode-switch instructions when they appear.
- Strict execution contract: when a user explicitly invokes a skill, execute that skill protocol as written.
- Subagent authorization: when a skill is user-invoked or AI-detected and its protocol requires subagents, that skill activation authorizes use of the required
spawn_agentsubagent(s) for that task.- Do not skip, reorder, or merge protocol steps unless the user explicitly approves the deviation first.
- For workflow skills, execute each listed child-skill step explicitly and report step-by-step evidence.
- If a required step/tool cannot run in this environment, stop and ask the user before adapting.
Codex does not receive Claude hook-based doc injection. When coding, planning, debugging, testing, or reviewing, open project docs explicitly using this routing.
Always read:
docs/project-config.json (project-specific paths, commands, modules, and workflow/test settings)docs/project-reference/docs-index-reference.md (routes to the full docs/project-reference/* catalog)docs/project-reference/lessons.md (always-on guardrails and anti-patterns)Situation-based docs:
backend-patterns-reference.md, domain-entities-reference.md, project-structure-reference.mdfrontend-patterns-reference.md, scss-styling-guide.md, design-system/README.mdfeature-docs-reference.mdintegration-test-reference.mde2e-test-reference.mdcode-review-rules.md plus domain docs above based on changed filesDo not read all docs blindly. Start from docs-index-reference.md, then open only relevant files for the task.
Goal: Package code repositories into single AI-friendly files using Repomix for LLM analysis.
Workflow:
repomix with options, monitor token countsKey Rules:
--include patterns to stay within LLM context limits--style markdown for readable output--token-count-tree to identify token-heavy files before packagingBe skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).
Repomix packs entire repositories into single, AI-friendly files. Perfect for feeding codebases to LLMs like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini.
Use when:
repomix --version
# npm
npm install -g repomix
# Homebrew (macOS/Linux)
brew install repomix
# Package current directory (generates repomix-output.xml)
repomix
# Specify output format
repomix --style markdown
repomix --style json
# Package remote repository
npx repomix --remote owner/repo
# Custom output with filters
repomix --include "src/**/*.ts" --remove-comments -o output.md
Process remote repositories without cloning:
# Shorthand
npx repomix --remote yamadashy/repomix
# Full URL
npx repomix --remote https://github.com/owner/repo
# Specific commit
npx repomix --remote https://github.com/owner/repo/commit/hash
Strip comments from supported languages (HTML, CSS, JavaScript, TypeScript, Vue, Svelte, Python, PHP, Ruby, C, C#, Java, Go, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, Dart, Shell, YAML):
repomix --remove-comments
# Package feature branch for AI review
repomix --include "src/**/*.ts" --remove-comments -o review.md --style markdown
# Package third-party library
npx repomix --remote vendor/library --style xml -o audit.xml
# Package with docs and code
repomix --include "src/**,docs/**,*.md" --style markdown -o context.md
# Package specific modules
repomix --include "src/auth/**,src/api/**" -o debug-context.xml
# Full codebase context
repomix --remove-comments --copy
# Include specific patterns
repomix --include "src/**/*.ts,*.md"
# Ignore additional patterns
repomix -i "tests/**,*.test.js"
# Disable .gitignore rules
repomix --no-gitignore
# Output format
repomix --style markdown # or xml, json, plain
# Output file path
repomix -o output.md
# Remove comments
repomix --remove-comments
# Copy to clipboard
repomix --copy
# Use custom config file
repomix -c custom-config.json
# Initialize new config
repomix --init # creates repomix.config.json
Repomix automatically counts tokens for individual files, total repository, and per-format output.
Typical LLM context limits:
Understanding your codebase's token distribution is crucial for optimizing AI interactions. Use the --token-count-tree option to visualize token usage across your project:
repomix --token-count-tree
This displays a hierarchical view of your codebase with token counts:
š¢ Token Count Tree:
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
āāā src/ (70,925 tokens)
āāā cli/ (12,714 tokens)
ā āāā actions/ (7,546 tokens)
ā āāā reporters/ (990 tokens)
āāā core/ (41,600 tokens)
āāā file/ (10,098 tokens)
āāā output/ (5,808 tokens)
You can also set a minimum token threshold to focus on larger files:
repomix --token-count-tree 1000 # Only show files/directories with 1000+ tokens
This helps you:
Repomix uses Secretlint to detect sensitive data (API keys, passwords, credentials, private keys, AWS secrets).
Best practices:
.repomixignore for sensitive files.env filesDisable security checks if needed:
repomix --no-security-check
When user requests repository packaging:
Assess Requirements
Configure Filters
Execute Packaging
Validate Output
Deliver Context
For detailed information, see:
[IMPORTANT] Use task tracking to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting ā including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.
AI Mistake Prevention ā Failure modes to avoid on every task: Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal. Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing. Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain. Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips ā not just happy path. When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer ā never patch symptom site. Assume existing values are intentional ā ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code. Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks. Holistic-first debugging ā resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis. Surgical changes ā apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly. Surface ambiguity before coding ā don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.
Critical Thinking Mindset ā Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact ā cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence ā certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking ā every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact.
MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention ā holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction.
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using task tracking BEFORE starting
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality
[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using task tracking.
Source: .claude/hooks/lib/prompt-injections.cjs + .claude/.ck.json
$workflow-start <workflowId> for standard; sequence custom steps manually[CRITICAL] Hard-won project debugging/architecture rules. MUST ATTENTION apply BEFORE forming hypothesis or writing code.
Goal: Prevent recurrence of known failure patterns ā debugging, architecture, naming, AI orchestration, environment.
Top Rules (apply always):
ExecuteInjectScopedAsync for parallel async + repo/UoW ā NEVER ExecuteUowTaskwhere python/where py) ā NEVER assume python/python3 resolvesExecuteInjectScopedAsync, NEVER ExecuteUowTask. ExecuteUowTask creates new UoW but reuses outer DI scope (same DbContext) ā parallel iterations sharing non-thread-safe DbContext silently corrupt data. ExecuteInjectScopedAsync creates new UoW + new DI scope (fresh repo per iteration).AccountUserEntityEventBusMessage = Accounts owns). Core services (Accounts, Communication) are leaders. Feature services (Growth, Talents) sending to core MUST use {CoreServiceName}...RequestBusMessage ā never define own event for core to consume.HrManagerOrHrOrPayrollHrOperationsPolicy names set members, not what it guards. Add role ā rename = broken abstraction. Rule: names express DOES/GUARDS, not CONTAINS. Test: adding/removing member forces rename? YES = content-driven = bad ā rename to purpose (e.g., HrOperationsAccessPolicy). Nuance: "Or" fine in behavioral idioms (FirstOrDefault, SuccessOrThrow) ā expresses HAPPENS, not membership.python/python3 resolves ā verify alias first. Python may not be in bash PATH under those names. Check: where python / where py. Prefer py (Windows Python Launcher) for one-liners, node if JS alternative exists.Test-specific lessons ā
docs/project-reference/integration-test-reference.mdLessons Learned section. Production-code anti-patterns ādocs/project-reference/backend-patterns-reference.mdAnti-Patterns section. Generic debugging/refactoring reminders ā System Lessons in.claude/hooks/lib/prompt-injections.cjs.
ExecuteInjectScopedAsync, NEVER ExecuteUowTask (shared DbContext = silent data corruption){CoreServiceName}...RequestBusMessagepython/python3 resolves ā run where python/where py first, use py launcher or nodeBreak work into small tasks (task tracking) before starting. Add final task: "Analyze AI mistakes & lessons learned".
Extract lessons ā ROOT CAUSE ONLY, not symptom fixes:
$learn.$code-review/$code-simplifier/$security/$lint catch this?" ā Yes ā improve review skill instead.$learn.
[TASK-PLANNING] [MANDATORY] BEFORE executing any workflow or skill step, create/update task tracking for all planned steps, then keep it synchronized as each step starts/completes.