with one click
graph-sync
// [Code Intelligence] Use when you need to sync the code review knowledge graph with current git state.
// [Code Intelligence] Use when you need to sync the code review knowledge graph with current git state.
[HINT] Download the complete skill directory including SKILL.md and all related files
| name | graph-sync |
| description | [Code Intelligence] Use when you need to sync the code review knowledge graph with current git state. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
Goal: [Code Intelligence] Sync the code review knowledge graph with current git state. Detects files changed since last sync via git diff and re-parses them. Runs automatically on session start; use manually after pulling code or switching branches.
Workflow:
Key Rules:
file:line) with confidence >80% to act.git pull / git merge / git checkout to update graph with new codelast_synced_commit from graph metadataHEAD commit hashgit diff --name-status {last}..{HEAD} to find changed/added/deleted fileslast_synced_commitAfter syncing changed files, the sync command automatically re-runs:
connect-api) — refreshes frontend-to-backend API endpoint edgesconnect-implicit) — refreshes behavioral edges (MESSAGE_BUS, TRIGGERS_EVENT, PRODUCES_EVENT, TRIGGERS_COMMAND_EVENT)This means after sync, ALL connections are up-to-date — not just direct code edges. If a new bus message producer was added in a synced file, the implicit connector will create MESSAGE_BUS edges to all matching consumers.
python .claude/scripts/code_graph sync --json
full_rebuild_fallback (unreachable commit), inform user that a full rebuild was triggeredpython .claude/scripts/code_graph update --json
sync only detects committed changes (diffs last_synced_commit vs HEAD)update --json instead (detects working tree changes)incremental subcommand — use update for incremental builds--files flag on sync — it auto-detects changed files from git| Command | Scope | Use When |
|---|---|---|
sync --json | Committed changes only (last_synced_commit → HEAD) | After pull, merge, checkout |
update --json | Working tree changes from base (default HEAD~1) | Staged/uncommitted changes, mid-session refresh |
/graph-update — Update graph with uncommitted working tree changes (explicitly invoked in step 4)/graph-build — Full or incremental graph build/graph-blast-radius — Analyze structural impact of changes/graph-query — Query code relationshipsSync the knowledge graph with the current git state by diffing last_synced_commit against HEAD.
AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:
Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal. Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing. Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain. Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path. When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site. Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code. Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks. Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis. Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly. Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.
Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact.
MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction.
TaskCreate BEFORE startingfile:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.