with one click
idea
// [Project Management] Use when capturing new ideas, feature requests, or concepts for future refinement.
// [Project Management] Use when capturing new ideas, feature requests, or concepts for future refinement.
[HINT] Download the complete skill directory including SKILL.md and all related files
| name | idea |
| version | 1.1.0 |
| description | [Project Management] Use when capturing new ideas, feature requests, or concepts for future refinement. |
[BLOCKING] Execute skill steps in declared order. NEVER skip, reorder, or merge steps without explicit user approval. [BLOCKING] Before each step or sub-skill call, update task tracking: set
in_progresswhen step starts, setcompletedwhen step ends. [BLOCKING] Every completed/skipped step MUST include brief evidence or explicit skip reason. [BLOCKING] If Task tools are unavailable, create and maintain an equivalent step-by-step plan tracker with the same status transitions.
Goal: Capture raw product ideas as structured backlog artifacts with project module context.
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION TaskCreate task to READ project-specific reference doc:
project-structure-reference.mdโ project patterns and structure. Not found โ search: project documentation, coding standards, architecture docs.
Workflow:
IDEA-YYMMDD-NNN) + draft statusAskUserQuestion 3-5 structured questions (MANDATORY)/refine for PBI creationKey Rules:
team-artifacts/ideas/{YYMMDD}-{role}-idea-{slug}.mdt_shirt_size (XS/S/M/L/XL) in artifact for early sizingAuto-detected: No codebase found (no
src/,app/,lib/,server/,packages/dirs; nopackage.json/*.sln/go.mod; noproject-config.json) โ greenfield mode. Planning artifacts (docs/,plans/,.claude/) don't count โ project must have actual code dirs with content.
When greenfield detected:
project-structure-reference.md read (won't exist)AskUserQuestion frequency โ capture vision, constraints, team profile, scale expectations.claude/docs/team-artifacts/templates/idea-template.mdIDEA-{YYMMDD}-{NNN} (sequential)draftDynamic Discovery:
Glob("docs/business-features/*/README.md")| Scenario | Action |
|---|---|
| Clear match | Auto-detect โ NEVER show confidence levels |
| Ambiguous / no match | Prompt: "Which project module?" + Glob results + "Cross-cutting/Infrastructure" |
| 2+ modules detected | Load ALL modules, add all to related_features |
If module detected:
docs/business-features/{module}/README.md (first 200 lines)module: {detected_module}, related_features: [Feature1, Feature2]Token Budget: Target 8-12K tokens total.
team-artifacts/ideas/{YYMMDD}-{role}-idea-{slug}.mdUse AskUserQuestion โ 3-5 structured questions. Each MUST ATTENTION have 2-4 options with one marked "(Recommended)".
| Category | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity | Distinguish problem from solution | "What problem does this solve?" + options |
| User Persona | Identify primary user | "Who benefits most?" + role options |
| Scope | MVP vs full vision | "What's smallest valuable version?" |
| Testability | Define done? | "How would you verify this works?" |
| Impact | Business value sizing | "How many users/processes affected?" |
| Constraints | Known blockers | "Any technical/business constraints?" |
| Scale | Expected load/growth | "How many users/transactions expected?" |
Greenfield: NEVER include tech stack questions. Focus on business problem, users, scale, constraints.
Testability Question (ALWAYS include): "How would you verify this feature works correctly?" โ Options: manual test steps, automated test criteria, metric thresholds.
Document all answers under ## Discovery Interview.
AskUserQuestion โ 2-3 validation questions:
| Category | Example Question |
|---|---|
| Problem | "Is the problem statement clear and user-focused?" |
| Value | "What's the expected business value or user benefit?" |
| Scope | "Any scope boundaries to clarify now?" |
| Stakeholders | "Who else should review this idea?" |
Document under ## Validation Summary. Update artifact based on answers.
Validation Output Format:
## Validation Summary
**Validated:** {date}
### Confirmed
- {decision}: {user choice}
### Action Items
- [ ] {follow-up if any}
AskUserQuestion after capture:
/refine โ Refine into PBI (Recommended)/tdd-spec โ Jump straight to test spec/plan โ Start implementation planningOutput: "Idea captured! To refine into a PBI, run: /refine {filename}"
Module detected: "Module context from {module} will be used during refinement."
## Domain Context (Project Features)
### Module
{module_name}
### Related Features
- {Feature1} - [docs link]
- {Feature2} - [docs link]
### Domain Entities
- **Primary:** {Entity1}, {Entity2}
- **Related:** {Entity3}
### Existing Business Rules
- BR-{MOD}-XXX: {Brief description}
## UI Sketch
### Layout
{Rough ASCII wireframe โ see UI wireframe protocol}
### Key Components
- **{Component}** โ {purpose} _(tier: common | domain-shared | page/app)_
Search existing libs before proposing new components. Backend-only idea:
## UI SketchโN/A โ Backend-only change. No UI affected.
/idea "Dark mode toggle for settings"
# Creates: team-artifacts/ideas/260119-po-idea-dark-mode-toggle.md
/idea "Add goal progress tracking notification"
# Creates with module context: team-artifacts/ideas/260119-po-idea-goal-progress-notification.md
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION โ NO EXCEPTIONS: Not already in workflow โ MUST ATTENTION use
AskUserQuestion:
- Activate
idea-to-pbiworkflow (Recommended) โ idea โ refine โ refine-review โ story โ story-review โ prioritize- Execute
/ideadirectly โ run standalone
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION โ NO EXCEPTIONS after completing skill, use AskUserQuestion:
[IMPORTANT]
TaskCreatebreak ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting โ including tasks each file read. Simple tasks: AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.
External Memory: Complex/lengthy work (research, analysis, scan, review) โ write intermediate findings to
plans/reports/โ prevents context loss, serves as deliverable.
Evidence Gate: MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION โ every claim, finding, recommendation requires
file:lineproof or traced evidence, confidence percentage (>80% act, <80% verify first).
UI Wireframe โ Process visual design input (Figma URLs, screenshots, wireframes) via appropriate tool BEFORE creating wireframes. Use box-drawing ASCII characters for spatial layout. Classify every component into exactly ONE tier: Common (cross-app reusable) / Domain-Shared (cross-domain) / Page (single-page). Duplicate UI code = wrong tier. Search existing component libraries before creating new (>=80% match = reuse). Detail level varies by skill (idea=rough, story=full decomposition).
AI Mistake Prevention โ Failure modes to avoid on every task:
Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal. Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing. Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain. Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips โ not just happy path. When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer โ never patch symptom site. Assume existing values are intentional โ ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code. Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks. Holistic-first debugging โ resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis. Surgical changes โ apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly. Surface ambiguity before coding โ don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.
Critical Thinking Mindset โ Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact โ cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence โ certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
Sequential Thinking Protocol โ Structured multi-step reasoning for complex/ambiguous work. Use when planning, reviewing, debugging, or refining ideas where one-shot reasoning is unsafe.
Trigger when: complex problem decomposition ยท adaptive plans needing revision ยท analysis with course correction ยท unclear/emerging scope ยท multi-step solutions ยท hypothesis-driven debugging ยท cross-cutting trade-off evaluation.
Format (explicit mode โ visible thought trail):
Thought N/M: [aspect]โ one aspect per thought, state assumptions/uncertaintyThought N/M [REVISION of Thought K]: ...โ when prior reasoning invalidated; state Original / Why revised / ImpactThought N/M [BRANCH A from Thought K]: ...โ explore alternative; converge with decision rationaleThought N/M [HYPOTHESIS]: ...then[VERIFICATION]: ...โ test before actingThought N/N [FINAL]โ only when verified, all critical aspects addressed, confidence >80%Mandatory closers: Confidence % stated ยท Assumptions listed ยท Open questions surfaced ยท Next action concrete.
Stop conditions: confidence <80% on any critical decision โ escalate via AskUserQuestion ยท โฅ3 revisions on same thought โ re-frame the problem ยท branch count >3 โ split into sub-task.
Implicit mode: apply methodology internally without visible markers when adding markers would clutter the response (routine work where reasoning aids accuracy).
Deep-dive: see
/sequential-thinkingskill (.claude/skills/sequential-thinking/SKILL.md) for worked examples (api-design, debug, architecture), advanced techniques (spiral refinement, hypothesis testing, convergence), and meta-strategies (uncertainty handling, revision cascades).
MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking โ every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact.
MUST ATTENTION apply sequential-thinking โ multi-step Thought N/M, REVISION/BRANCH/HYPOTHESIS markers, confidence % closer; see /sequential-thinking skill.
MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention โ holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction.
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION follow declared step order for this skill; NEVER skip, reorder, or merge steps without explicit user approval
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION for every step/sub-skill call: set in_progress before execution, set completed after execution
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION every skipped step MUST include explicit reason; every completed step MUST include concise evidence
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION if Task tools unavailable, maintain an equivalent step-by-step plan tracker with synchronized statuses
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION TaskCreate break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION validate all decisions with user via AskUserQuestion โ NEVER auto-decide
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Discovery Interview + Validation NEVER optional โ MANDATORY steps
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION NEVER ask about tech stack in greenfield mode โ defer to business-evaluation phase
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION auto-detect module silently โ prompt only when ambiguous
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add final review task to verify work quality
Anti-Rationalization:
| Evasion | Rebuttal |
|---|---|
| "Idea is simple, skip interview" | NEVER skip โ discovery uncovers hidden constraints |
| "Module is obvious, skip detection" | Still run Glob() โ confirm with evidence not assumption |
| "Validation is redundant after interview" | ALWAYS run both โ different question categories |
| "Greenfield check is optional" | Auto-detect is MANDATORY โ no manual override |
[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.