with one click
mcp-builder
// [AI & Tools] Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
// [AI & Tools] Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
[HINT] Download the complete skill directory including SKILL.md and all related files
| name | mcp-builder |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| description | [AI & Tools] Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK). |
| license | Complete terms in LICENSE.txt |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Goal: Create high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers enabling LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools.
Workflow:
Key Rules:
Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).
To create high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to effectively interact with external services, use this skill. An MCP server provides tools that allow LLMs to access external services and APIs. The quality of an MCP server is measured by how well it enables LLMs to accomplish real-world tasks using the tools provided.
Creating a high-quality MCP server involves four main phases:
Before diving into implementation, understand how to design tools for AI agents by reviewing these principles:
Build for Workflows, Not Just API Endpoints:
schedule_event that both checks availability and creates event)Optimize for Limited Context:
Design Actionable Error Messages:
Follow Natural Task Subdivisions:
Use Evaluation-Driven Development:
Fetch the latest MCP protocol documentation:
Use WebFetch to load: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/llms-full.txt
This comprehensive document contains the complete MCP specification and guidelines.
Load and read the following reference files:
For Python implementations, also load:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/main/README.mdFor Node/TypeScript implementations, also load:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/main/README.mdTo integrate a service, read through ALL available API documentation:
To gather comprehensive information, use web search and the WebFetch tool as needed.
Based on your research, create a detailed plan that includes:
Tool Selection:
Shared Utilities and Helpers:
Input/Output Design:
Error Handling Strategy:
Now that you have a comprehensive plan, begin implementation following language-specific best practices.
For Python:
.py file or organize into modules if complex (see 🐍 Python Guide)For Node/TypeScript:
package.json and tsconfig.jsonTo begin implementation, create shared utilities before implementing tools:
For each tool in the plan:
Define Input Schema:
Write Comprehensive Docstrings/Descriptions:
Implement Tool Logic:
Add Tool Annotations:
readOnlyHint: true (for read-only operations)destructiveHint: false (for non-destructive operations)idempotentHint: true (if repeated calls have same effect)openWorldHint: true (if interacting with external systems)At this point, load the appropriate language guide:
For Python: Load 🐍 Python Implementation Guide and ensure the following:
model_configFor Node/TypeScript: Load ⚡ TypeScript Implementation Guide and ensure the following:
server.registerTool properly.strict()any types - use proper typesnpm run build)After initial implementation:
To ensure quality, review the code for:
Important: MCP servers are long-running processes that wait for requests over stdio/stdin or sse/http. Running them directly in your main process (e.g., python server.py or node dist/index.js) will cause your process to hang indefinitely.
Safe ways to test the server:
timeout 5s python server.pyFor Python:
python -m py_compile your_server.pyFor Node/TypeScript:
npm run build and ensure it completes without errorsTo verify implementation quality, load the appropriate checklist from the language-specific guide:
After implementing your MCP server, create comprehensive evaluations to test its effectiveness.
Load ✅ Evaluation Guide for complete evaluation guidelines.
Evaluations test whether LLMs can effectively use your MCP server to answer realistic, complex questions.
To create effective evaluations, follow the process outlined in the evaluation guide:
Each question must be:
Create an XML file with this structure:
<evaluation>
<qa_pair>
<question>Find discussions about AI model launches with animal codenames. One model needed a specific safety designation that uses the format ASL-X. What number X was being determined for the model named after a spotted wild cat?</question>
<answer>3</answer>
</qa_pair>
<!-- More qa_pairs... -->
</evaluation>
Load these resources as needed during development:
https://modelcontextprotocol.io/llms-full.txt - Complete MCP specificationhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/main/README.mdhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/main/README.md🐍 Python Implementation Guide - Complete Python/FastMCP guide with:
@mcp.tool⚡ TypeScript Implementation Guide - Complete TypeScript guide with:
server.registerToolmcp-managementclaude-code[IMPORTANT] Use
TaskCreateto break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.
AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task: Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal. Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing. Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain. Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path. When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site. Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code. Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks. Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis. Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly. Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.
Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.
MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact.
MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction.
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality
[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.